and we did. >> justice kagan did, in fact, kill a deer. she says she has come to enjoy hunting, especially with justice scalia. and as a kid from the upper west side of manhattan, she had no prior experience in it. >>> up next for us here tonight, how more and more teachers are teaching without any students in the room.

i think justice kagan works with him as well. justice ginsburg seems extremely dedicated to it. a real regular. i believe that he said that she can do 20 perfect push-ups. whether that is true or an advertisement for himself, we do not know. [laughter] there was no documentation of it. she takes care of herself after the health scares she has had. the question is always when she will be ready to leave the court and she doesn't give any of us an indication that the time has come. >> she is very sharp on the bench. when i started there, justice brennan and justice marshall -- they sort of sat quietly and rarely said anything. ruth ginsburg, almost every argument she would ask the first question and is really sharp with the question. if there are any fudges or misstatements, she will correct them and say it. she is always well prepared an extremely sharp in the questions. >> she was the second woman on the court. after a while, she was the only one. now there are three. are they a voting block? >> there are 36 possible combinations of pairs of nine justices. the three pairs most li

and we did. >> justice kagan did, in fact, kill a deer. says she has come to enjoy hunting, especially with justice scalia. and as a kid from the upper west side of manhattan, she had no prior experience in it. >>> up next for us here tonight, how more and more teachers are teaching without any students in the room. >>> finally tonight, you all know what can happen. all it takes is one video on youtube, and that leads to another. sometimes the video they suggest for you, and before you know it, it's hours later and you cannot account for your time or your taste in web videos. but now to match a big need, there is another use of youtube that increasing numbers of people are turning to in earnest. and the summer school veterans among us might want to pay attention. our report tonight from nbc's stephanie gosk. >> i love you. >> i love you. >> reporter: youtube, the world wide web's one-stop shop for all things viral. >> i love you. >> reporter: the 2 too cute. the too funny. the simply ridiculous. this summer, parents may be thinking i have

if this were john roberts and scalia, kagan, clarence thomas, and all the other, all the rest of the gang remaking these laws in public where we can hear what they're saying and read their opinions and congress could react, saying, yes, that's what we meant by relevant or no, it's not, this is what we meant by relevant. that's now how it's happening. this is happenings in secret. laws passed by congress are being rewritten by the secret court without any sort of public comment or public review. over the weekend "the new york times" reported on more than a dozen, a dozen classified rulings from this court that have created essentially a secret body of law totally removed from public scrutiny. the "times" said this court has "quietly become almost a parallel supreme court." that, i think, is a scary quote enough. a parallel supreme court out of view. it is unlike any other court in the country. it would give the "schoolhouse

>> justice kagan, that would be a -- a very tough question. it's by no means the question before the court, because -- because it isn't any citizen, it's -- it is the -- it is the official proponents that have a specific and carefully detailed >> well, i just -- if you would on the hypothetical -- could a state just assign to anybody the ability to do this? >> your honor, i think it very well might. it very well might be able to decide that any citizen could step forward and represent the interests of the state and the people in that state -- >> well, that would be -- i'm sorry, are you finished? >> yes, your honor. >> ok. that may be true in terms of who they want to represent, but a state can't authorize anyone to proceed in federal court, because that would leave the definition under article iii of the federal constitution as to who can bring -- who has standing to bring claims up to each state. and i don't think we've ever allowed anything like that. >> but, your honor, i guess the point i want to make is that there is no question the stat

challenges are generally our law.d in so the question then becomes, a formula trike down as justice kagan said which circumstance the record shows the remedy with the proportional, rational, whatever standard of applicationply, its to alabama would happen. >> two separate questions. one is whether the formula needs be addressed in northwest austin. this court addressed the formula. circumstances there were a very small jurisdiction, as court said approaching a big question. rome.he 15i78 in so the formula itself is the shelby county encounters the burdens and the --son why the court >> interestingly enough, the court didn't do what you're asking us to do, which is to record of all of the other states or all of the other counties. it's basically concentrated on litigants of the two in the case. nd that extrapolated more broadly. i don't think that you're -- >> you're asking us to do something which is to ignore record and look at everybody else's. >> i don't think that's a fair katzenback. in katzenback, what the court id was examine whether the formula was rational in practice and in theo

band called 867- >> two different things. >> who thinks justice kagan knew this? who thinks one of the law clerks looked at him? -- who thinks one of the law clerks slipped it in? >> i think one of the law clerks slipped it in. she pointed out how she brought for an oralmbat argument on video games. she disclosed that she asked one of her clerks that she was going for in oral argument. i need a violent videogame. one of them volunteered that to her. i'm not sure how much a clerk helped her out on that. >> she is the youngest justice. things -- signs of for they have gotten into an opinion 30 or 50 years ago at all? not totally different. 50 years ago you would have to have asked -- [laughter] >> thanks. >> we talked about good questions justice kagan and justice ginsburg asked. justice robert did say something one morning. they created quite a firestorm in the press. , are you up to date on that? in a press down larry, we looked at each other. did he really say something? -- i remember we were in a press gallery. we looked at each other. did he really say somethin

. >> rachel kagan, spokesperson for sfo general where critical patients went to. right now they have 10 critical patients. six women, four men. two children. but, people have been sent to different area hospitals. we are talking about highland hospital, stanford hospital, saint francis hospital in the city as well and along the peninsula as well. the manifest included 291 passengers, 16 crew members, for a total of 307 people. it has been chaotic and difficult. we just had a short while ago a news conference with mayor ed lee. chief fire chief joanne hayes-white talking how 190 people if you can understand when you look at the plane, 190 people were found when the firefighters arrived walking off that plane. so, much belter numbers than we could have seen. this could have been a much worse situation. initially, now we are hearing 132 people transported to hospitals. varying degrees of people injuri injuries, nbc bay area's cheryl herd on site since the plane crash happened. let's turn things over to her. >> reporter: jessica, i have been dichg pping in and out of

rachel kagan, san francisco general hospital center. it's 7:00 saturday, evening update. currently our grand total number of patients from this asiana airlines accident is 52. when we last spoke it was at 34. since that time 18 additional patients have come. this last wave or most recent wave of patients has been in much better shape than the previous three waves. most of them can walk in on their own. they can talk. they're conscious. they were all brought in by ambulances in groups of three or five. but they are here being assessed and converted, it's our pediatric urgent care center converted to day to manage the large volume of patients. i don't know the breakdown at this time of men and women or ages or conditions. they're all being assessed now. but i do know they're in generally better health than any of the previous patients from earlier today. so just to recap the day, we now have 52 patients total. the very first group, the first wave, were ten critically injured patients who came at about 12:30 this afternoon. of -- they were all in critical condition when they

>> justice kagan, there is a three-prong test. even if you treat that as injury, it does not meet the requirements for standing on appeal, because the government has not asked this court to remedy that injury. the government has not asked this court to overturn the rulings below so it doesn't have to pay the $365,000. it has asked this court to affirm. and the case or controversy requirement that we're talking about are nested in an adversarial system where we rely on the parties to state their injuries and make their claims for relief. if the government or any party is not bound with respect to standing by its articulated request for a remedy, what that does is it enables the court to fill in, to reshape. and for a doctrine that is supposed to be limiting the occasions for judicial review of constitutionality, that is troubling. >> but don't we often separate those two things, ask whether there's injury for article iii purposes and causation and redressability, as you say, but then say, well, sometimes when all of those are met,

scalia and justices ruth bader ginsburg, sonia sotomayor and eleanor kagan ruled against the here's what scalia said about his descent "the court has cast aside a bedrock rule of our 4 4th amendment law that the government may not search its citizens for evidence of crime unless there is a reasonable cause to believe that such evidence will be found. question. will the supreme court decision prompt a national standard for the collection of dna? >> eventually it probably will, and here'swhat you need to know to see which direction the country's going. in 2009 e supreme court@ruled thatsomebody con.icted of a crime@does not have the right to he access to their own dna even if it would prove them innocent. so we had a bill of rights set up to protect people. instead@peopledon't have access to their own dna but the government does have the access >> what's dna? >> well, it's your internal fingprint in some way. >> what does it stand for? dna. >> oh, boy. >> come on, struggle. >> i don't know.@ >> nucleicacid. i know that. >> that's the best we can do here? >> looks like it. >> does it give y

we asked tech analyst jeff kagan. "i can imagine what's going to happen next - is tmobile going to come back and upgrade their offering to match at&t? is verizon going to jump in and have a matching plan? whatever happens, this is a good first step into the new world of wireless." the new plan will be available to at&t customers starting july 26th. verizon is reportedly working on a similar plan. the price plan strategy that offers a new phone every year is just one of the ways technology is moving at hyperspeed. sasha segan of pc magazine joins us via skype this morning. hello, and should consumers buy into the need for a new phone every year? - well, a lot of people already feel that they need a new phone every year, because apple, samsung, htc, all the big phone manufacturers, are constantly pushing these new devices with new features and new designs. so in that case, the carriers are really just reacting to what they see as consumer pressure to let people upgrade more often. - and who benefits from that? the consu

our discussion now live from tel aviv is diplomatic correspondent for the jurist lynn post kanan mr kagan thank you very much indeed for joining us now it's i'll see many projects egypt will spiral into more violence and some even say civil war how likely is this scenario. look i mean it's difficult sitting here in israel it's very difficult to kind of predict what's going to happen in egypt i think i think the officials in israel are watching the situation very carefully and very warily worrying how it all could impact on egypt's relationship with israel yes how will this spillover effect being tiring. but again it's we just have to have a little patience and wait and see how things play out i think will take some time i think in general you can say a couple things about how israel looks at these types of events israel is adverse to chaos is the first to unpredictability and i think what this does is this sends the whole region into a certain degree of chaos in a certain degree of unpredictability which is uncomfortable for israel israel like stability it likes predictability even if tho

justin kagan said it was four imes more adjusting for population data. the fact of the matter is there's another piece of this case that pay on the mccreary looks a it all f the section 2 cases and he shows that the katz study pointed to dramatically disparity. the >> all of the noncovered states are worse in that regard than states, is that is that correct? >> justice scalia -- >> every one is worse? fair question. and i was speaking to the aggregate. >> not just a fair one, it's the question. congress has selected these nine states. now, is there some good reason selecting these nine? >> what we see in the evidence of the top eight states 2 h favorable section outcomes, seven were covered jurisdictions, the eighth was mechanism aser the justice kennedy points out can bring jurisdictions with special voting. in we point to the fact that is not a static statute. >> but the point is -- i think is this -- if you draw a red line around the states in, at least some of those states have a better record than some of the states that are out. o in 1965, well, we

i gotta tell you i love to -- i love to play audio of elena kagan.n her interview out of -- this is justice kagan. a lot of important things to talk about. and she started talking about the fact that you know, there may be liberals and conservatives on the court but we all get along and in fact, we're really good friends. a lot of good people in the court. and you would be surprised at some of the people we might hang out with and what we might get into. we were surprised to find out she hangs out with justice scalia. she's a big game hunter. here's how that interview went. >> i shoot birds with him. two or three times a year now. and then he -- at the end of last year, we had been bird shooting four or five times. i'll tell you how that came to be but before i do -- so he said to me, it's time for big game hunting. and we actually went out to wyoming this past fall to shoot deer and antelope. and we did. [ laughter ] >> getting hisses from the audience. >> bill: and then she said she got her deer. so she got a deer. i don't know. look -- i'm not aga

rachel kagan with san francisco general hospital and trauma center. ism giving you the 5:00 update on the patients from the asiana airlines accident here at san francisco general. our grand total so far today is now 34 patients. of those patients, 11 are children. and 23 are adults. we have five in critical condition from the original ten you may recall that at the 2:00 update we had ten critically injured patients. five of those remain critically injured. five -- the other five have been upgraded to serious. for the rest of the group, getting up to a grand total of 34. we do not have conditions breakdowns yet. they are being assessed and we do know their injuries vary. they not all of them will be admitted. some are in good condition and they will be treated and released. some will have more serious injuries. and will be admitted. we have had three waves of patients today. the first ten people critically injured. then 17 people with a mixture of injuries. and then seven people also with a mixture of injuries. again, 34 total. 11 children and 23 adult

justice kagan -- it was as 63 3 decision. 6- justice kagan wrote a very interesting dissent stating that that if your anti- class action everything is a she went on to explain this as a whole lot more than a class-action case. it should not have come out on the basis of that. it does demonstrate -- justice ginsburg is quitef civil procedure. the outcome of these cases is not necessarily predictable. the court is looking very carefully at class actions. looking very carefully at short cases and the whole management of what happens in civil process in our court. >>ck linda, quick comment? it is not so much that the court is a pro-business court, but it is an anti-litigation court. the discovery cases. where the court is a pro- business court, we do not have time to get through the seven new employment discrimination cases that came out this last week interpreting title vii as -- it is to conflict hated to go into. dissentginsburg earl was very reminiscent of her dissent in the ledbetter case which led to congressial reenactment of that provision of title vii. perhaps the same thing might h

. >> elena kagan, big game hunter.he liberal leading supreme court justice told an audience this past weekend she took a trip last fall to wyoming to hunt. she did it with conservative justice, scalia. they shot birds together before, but this time was different. >> he said to me, he said it's time for big game hunting. we actually went out to wyoming this past fall to shoot deer and antelope. and we did. i shot myself a deer. >> she's not very big, by the way. the deer and antelope much bigger than her. she said the public doesn't realize, there are friendships in the high court that reach across political lines. she knows hunting with scalia a few times a year. a shotgun must knock her back 12 feet. >> exactly. >>> coming up, you have to stick around for this. this is a great story. unlikely hero, saving his family as fast moving flames spread through their home. you are going to hear from him in his own words, that's straight ahead. so... [ gasps ] these are sandra's "homemade" yummy, scrumptious bars. hmm? i just w

president obama addresses kennedy and kagan are on the down low meaning gay but you know secretly --resenting the pie. >> who wants some pie. >> stephanie: how do we know? because ex-gay activist greg quinlan says so. the president of parents and friends of ex-gays and gays. he told his personal story of having once been a supporter of gay rights groups like human rights campaign. he said the devil made him do it but now he's reformed and a proud leader of the ex-gay movement. is he the only one left? we should applaud him then. >> which need to focus group their acronyms better. >> stephanie: two founders of the first one ran off together in a really gay way. in a john roberts gay island way. during his tenure volunteering for hr, quinlan said he learned kennedy and kagan are secretly -- calling them black robed nazis with is a good analogy except they started killing the gays first so really, that's kind of a -- >> there are a lot of people in pink triangles as well as yellow stars. >> stephanie: quinlan said they used the court to accommodate their own predilections including kenn

i was covering elena kagan's confirmation hearing in the summer of 2010 when i received, really two extraordinary e-mails. the one e-mail was from an editor at simon & schuster who was very interested in a book about the supreme court. the other e-mail was from a very faithful pbs fan a young man, who attach ad photo and asked me to marry him. [laughter] >> marcia was already taken by the way. >> i was. but i did show it to my husband. by the way it was such a beautifully written proposal who proposed to me in a parking lot in downtown baltimore. [laughter] but there was no future in that proposal. so i did respond to the one from the editor at simon & schuster and. she really convinced me that, it was a good time to look at the supreme court because even though it was young, and this was five years into john roberts's tenure as chief, it had shown a willing necessary to really take on some very controversial issues. and, part of the reason i picked the four cases i did because i wanted issues i thought based on those five years would have some shelf life. that we would see them coming back and w

and she is married to bob kagan, an influential conservative in foreign policy circles.ew land's rise in official washington was threatened by benghazi to. hear her tell it, when new land was pushing her colleagues at cia to delete references to terrorism from the benghazi talking points she was acting, quote on instinct and not doing the bidding of then secretary of state hillary clinton even when nuland wrote to her cia colleagues these revisions don't resolve all of my issues or those of my building leadership. they are consulting with national security staff. >> can you just tell me who that building leadership was, who you are referring to there? >> the only person that i consulted with that night was my regular reporting channel. >> and that person is. >> at the time that was jake sullivan. >> jake sullivan is now vice president biden's top national security advisor. last september, sullivan was deputy chief of staff to then secretary of state clinton. clinton has denied knowing anything about the cia and benghazi which was also attacked that night being used for a

i think justice kagan works with him as well. justice ginsburg seems extremely dedicated to it. a real regular. i believe that he said that she can do 20 perfect push-ups. whether that is true or an advertisement for himself, we do not know. [laughter] there was no documentation of it. she takes care of herself after the health scares she has had. the question is always when she will be ready to leave the court and she doesn't give any of us an indication that the time has come. >> she is very sharp on the bench. when i started there, justice brennan and justice marshall -- they sort of sat quietly and rarely said anything. ruth ginsburg, almost every argument she would ask the first question and is really sharp with the question. if there are any fudges or misstatements, she will correct them and say it. she is always well prepared an extremely sharp in the questions. >> she was the second woman on the court. after a while, she was the only one. now there are three. adam, you wrote about the three women justices -- are they a voting block? >> there are 36 possible combinations

we put the question to famous harvard child psychologist jerome kagan: could a virtual reality experienceperhaps a specially designed game have the same effect? >> a lot of these are novelty effects. a lot of these experiments in the literature about you bring someone in and you show them what its like to be old and you say, now, how much money would you like to get for your retirement? and they give a little more money. but, by the time you're four you understand the difference between fantasy and real life. when you're in a laboratory >> reporter: well, but wait, virtual reality, the very name suggests that you cant really or may not really be able to distinguish between the game experience and real life. >> i doubt that. you can always distinguish between being in a virtual reality laboratory and then leaving, closing the door, and going outside. >> reporter: not so, says jeremy bailenson. >> virtual experiences are very intense and the effects of them can carry over to the real world. ah! ( laughter ) that's unbelievable bailenson says research is beginning to show that virtual realit

rachel kagan with san francisco general hospital trauma sen center. giving you the 5:00 update on the patients from the asiana airlines accident here at san francisco general. our grand total so far today is now 34 patients. of those patients, 11 are children and 23 are adults. we have five in critical condition from the original ten you may recall that at the 2:00 update we had ten critically injured patients. five of those remain critically injured. five -- the other five have been upgraded to serious. for the rest of the group, getting up to a grand total of 34, we do not have condition breakdowns yet. they are being assessed, but we do know that their injuries vary. they, not all of them will be admitted. some are in good condition and they will be treated and released. some will have more serious injuries and will be admitted. we have had three waves of patients today. the first ten people critically injured. then 17 people with a mixture of injuries. and then seven people also with a mixture of injuries. again, 34 total. 11 children and 23 adult

justice kagan delivered a unanimous opinion. she explained that the florida checklist is too inflexible of a way to prove reliability and push too much emphasis on field performance where they can overstate a dog's false positive. perhaps out of alerted because harris had drug residue on his hands when he opened the door. there's a thing in the truck but perhaps it is not a good indicator that out aldo's sniffer was not up to snuff. [laughter] there should be no inflexible sharing to test a drug's reliability. a defendant could challenge the adequacy the certification and trnithe field evidence could be relevant but not responsive. he is off the hook. the second case features frankie, a different dog. he is not so lucky. this is different. it picks up on some of the things you were speaking on. this concerns a home and not a traffic stop. police were given a tip that he was growing marijuana in his home. an officer and frankie were sent to the residence. frankie and the officer approached the front porch. the dog since one of th

consultant that's worked extensively with most major broadcasting cable companies and justin nielsen of snl kaganank you for being here. bill, both cbs and time warner seem to have equal leverage here. how do you see this playing out given that we are minutes up to the deadline and there's a prime-time lineup that needs to go on the air tonight? >> great question, kayla. i don't have a krystal ball. i don't think either side knows how it will end up. i think as your reporter outlined, the three points, those are exactly the three options where the deal can go. i mean, hopefully, it will be a win-win situation. what's interesting here is it's in the middle of summer. there's not any big television event hanging out there, which typically happens when these negotiations happen. like a super bowl or an academy awards or some big event. so no one has a ton of leverage in the negotiation. i think cbs, probably the scale is tipped a little bit to their advantage. but, you know, my hope, and i'm sure the hope of consumers in nark, dallas, los angeles, the three markets impacted here, that they will figu

i don't know about -- i wouldn't picture elena kagan as a hunter. >> bill: i guess dick cheney hasn'tviting him to go duck hunting as much. at any rate, so one other story that came out over to the weekend, it is a favorite kind of bug of mine and that is ceo pay. the -- we talked about this earlier if you were with us. "the new york times" reporting yesterday their latest run-down of how much ceo salaries have gone up. now, in 2011, the average ceo salary went up only 2.8%. still out of line but it is acceptable. okay. for last year, the jump from 2011 to 2012 with the median ceo pay 16%. 16%. i don't know about you but most american workers did not get anything close to a 16% -- most american workers are lucky if they got any increase in salary at all. raises have been stagnant for the last ten years. what that means and by the way the big players -- the biggest of all is larry ellison, the head of oracle at $96.2 million a year. salary alone. marissa mayer, head of yahoo!, the top female ceo in terms of salary at $36.6 million. interesting that the woman only gets a third of what t

accepted 53 patients from the crash, including 27 adults and 26 children, hospital spokeswoman rachael kaganaid. as of 4 p.m. today, 17 remained hospitalized there, including five adults and one child in critical condition. thirty- six patients have been discharged and none remain in the emergency department. a chief surgeon at san francisco general hospital said today that the injuries suffered by [ female announcer ] ] it's a mountain grown mornig g with folgers lively colombia. welcoming the sunrise with h a taste of vanilla bisco. whether it's one cup up or a full carafe, turn any day gourmet with folgers gourmet selections. male narrator: male narrator: mattress discounters' $197 mattress sale is on now. dog: mattress discounters' $197 mattress sale? male narrator: right now, you can get a serta mattress, any size, for just $197 each piece when you buy the complete set. dog: any size mattress, twin, full, queen or king, for one low price. and they'll deliver it free! male narrator: the $197 mattress sale... dog: oh, boy! male narrator: ...is on now. ♪ ♪ mattress discounters! for foa str

as an example, it took quite a while, we had this piece around kagan where he was feeding his familyor hundreds of thousands of dollars and it got no play. taking his family on junkets to europe. i am mystified about that. any comments? well -- >> i think that's, first of all, i'm a very big proponent of the long-term research stories. i think there are a couple things. one is reporters, as i mentioned before, there are not a lot of investigative reporters. that is first. reporters want small, bite sized content. a tacticalom standpoint when i wake up in the morning, especially when you are in an election cycle, i just want to make sure the opponents, who ever it is, is having a bad day. if it is a small thing, it is a small day. and small things can become big things. we tried very hard to place think weories, and i talked about this before. i hope we never sent you all opposition book and said, here, publish this. if we did, i apologize. the idea is, we will send out a press release or bullets, and we quote,ve the greatest be witty, pithy, and the chance is it will not get as much

kagan had a, robert column criticizing back and saying it was a ridiculous because reagan was willingstand up to dictators here and there. the interesting thing is rand paul is right, that reagan was careful about the way he used foreign policy. he did not see the united states in major wars. he withdrew from lebanon after the bombing. however, ronald reagan was more of an internationalist. cutsgned the nuclear agreements with the soviets. he was willing to be part of the global world order and active participant. onre is something to be said alsopaul's side, but ronald reagan would not completely agree with rand paul's foreign policy. host: the next call is on the republican line. caller: i am a conservative republican. conservative republicans continue to pander to the communists in china in terms of trade policy and other issues? how conservatives control over for the communist regime -- can roll over for a communist regime. guest: i think you are seeing the divide between human rights and a ideological issues. in a way, the republican party might be torn on this issue. trade,he pa

it was an historical anomaly before justice kagan you had a bench entirely people who had been on federalat has to have an impact on the work. i do not know yet if it is a positive one or not. if you think the job of the supreme court is trying to apply law to particular cases, maybe it makes sense to have a court of judges. if you view it more in terms of playing a political role as part of the political process, maybe the way a constitutional court in european countries does, maybe it makes sense to have people who have been active in the political realms. it has to be saying something about the role of the court in terms of what the makeup this. you see in the arguments as well. we have a very good bar. they present legal arguments. if you go back and look at briefs filed in the warren era, they paint with a broader brush in terms of social policy and concerns. it reflected the audience they were in front of. people can and should debate whether that is a good development or not. i think one consequence is it is probably a good development if you have a sense of what type of issues sho

as an example, it took quite a while, we had this piece around kagan where he was taking his family onunkets to europe, feeding his family for hundreds of thousands of dollars and it got no play. i am mystified about that. any comments? >> well -- >> i think that's, first of all, i'm a very big proponent of the long-term research stories. i think there are a couple things. one is reporters, as i mentioned before, there are not a lot of investigative reporters. that is first. reporters want small, bite sized content. and then from a tactical standpoint when i wake up in the morning, especially when you are in an election cycle, i just want to make sure the opponents, who ever it is, is having a bad day. if it is a small thing, it is a small day. and small things can become big things. we tried very hard to place larger stories, and i think we talked about this before. allpe we never sent you opposition book and said, here, publish this. if we did, i apologize. the idea is, we will send out a press release or bullets, and we will have the greatest quote, be witty, pithy, and the chance i