african-american students last year kak 30 students were arrested. this year kak 17. progress. everything else seems pretty depressing. the district is 6.4% african-american. if my memory serves when a research the district years and years ago, the district was almost 30% african-american. 6.4% and that's about 3,600 african-american students. and if the math is right kak less than -- i just want -- it just bewilders me and others dot with that few amount of students, that we have these amount of numbers. and even though we have bemoaned the fact we don't have enough resources in this district kak we do have resources. we do have resources and we are not focusing the resources enough on the students that we are talking about to make sure we do not come up with these numbers year after year. and the fact that the commissioners brought up that we have reverted back to forum since before the initial resolution was passed kak i just feel that it is not necessarily about firing people. it is about a concerted effort that has never taken hold. prioritizing these schools, it is tier o

during negotiations kak we spent a lot of time on creating two committees. the labour-management health and safety committee and we added to that to address the safe and supported schools policy. that is article 14.5 end date certificate of contract, page 43. we also created a space community committee that includes parents and districts and union. article 21.10. page 66. the climate team was never brought to the bargaining table. it might be a great idea, but the letter that i reference that was to show administrators included a described climate team's purpose, composition, duties and function. it feels like possibly an end run around the contract. it also could be possibly a parallel structure. a structure outside of the contract. if we are going to have a climate team, let's make sure that it's part of the plan and is not duplicative, nor does it take away from committees that we work very hard and it negotiations to create. thank you pick one more thing, sorry. i just want to point out the district data, which i, -- it is something we have to take extre

up to, the challenges with issues in a very complicated community that's continuously neglected to kak how you have stood truong -- strong and tall in this chamber to defend the residents of district ten and putting them at the forefront of the decisions that you've been able to make, it has been incredible to watch. we have grown in these positions together, and your heart, i know, is not only for your district, it is for this city. i am grateful for your leadership on the budget and your leadership around cannabis, around police reform, fighting the tobacco industry, and the sugary beverage industry and all the other great things that people had talked about on this board. it shows you have lead by example and you will continue to be a leader here in working with your colleagues and working with me and other department heads to help us move a san francisco to a better place. i couldn't think of anyone better and more deserving to serve in this capacity. i am so grateful and honoured for your leadership, your friendship and your support over the years. i'm looking forward to a day whe

community, but also to low income seniors kak able to, and so forth. they are a godsend to me. i came in very desperate into their office and the executive director, to me he is an angel on earth. the organization is much needed anmuch-neededand i hope you cone supporting housing subsidies for them. thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> good morning supervisors. i wanted to urge you to find a senior community development specialist position in mohcd to ensure that this position will effectively coordinate the critical cultural district legislation that was recently passed by this board of supervisors capped unanimously. thank you. we think it's imperative this position be funded in mohcd in order to help us protect the unique cultural heritage of our communities. we also wanted to ask you to please fully fund the 375,000-dollar request for the prop and implementation related immigrant protection education program. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. >> thank you. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. next speaker, please. >> good morning. my name is jaclyn. i'm the

to support that they came up with a bunch of mini claims that there is no kak and we didn't know what was going on and no one knew of wikileaks. each outline wf those ends up being a lot and absolutely a lot so we are now to a point where there is no factual bases to support the one claim that is keeping this fallacy together which is that there is no collusion by the trump campaign with the russians. one quick other thing, this great cnn story was the second story today about june 9th, 2016. the one date that we should be focusing on for the next couple of months. the lawyer nathalia has ties with the russians and whether it was michael cohen who's talking about this or someone else in the room. everyone seems to be focused on the fact that trump knew before and this big new collusion claim have fallen apart. >> okay, just seriously, one more time simply explain that. you said this focus is all on one day. what is that saying to you? >> june 9th, 2016. because one is this is the meeting and there is actual access. why do they have the meeting at trump tower the day donald trump was t

no need to come up kak. i think we have enough information from you over the last several days. this is a conversation between the committee members and the analysts on the budget office, as well as the controller. colleagues, i want to give the budget legislative analyst office a opportunity to kind of walk us through the thoughts. they've listen to the conversation for several hours. as have we all. i want to recognize miss campbell. thank you. >> good morning. members of the committee. i'm here from the office of analysts. we made our recommendation to -- the twaddle police academies, the new police commissions adding up to about 100 police sworn spots in the next 20 years. our recommendations are based on our audit findings that we considered police finding to be adequate in the police district. that the proposed increases for investigations and foot patrols, the need was not yet known because the department had not yet completed or even started their workload analysis to determine what the actual additional need was and because we considered that there were opportunities wi