i was going to cancel the emissions i love this mentions kak. forms the styles highest in my mouth along with it and the same to sources i mean it's how do you know i'm not also boxes as you see misty got the system clinic teeth were to good when does my mum was darfur . and used the mobs best options and i'm going to insist on things and shop as i get these five maha into either cannot get my message to matter. who does the kid love damn them conceive my nose fast as this team would drag into seventy ad hours in the day nation i'll do just as i have. been das time off my comments and reviewing some tims in the fun will secure please spend to do business with sand shop and size them food to such foolishness and not compete at seven warm consumers with the mob to just feel human lives. this time and in that small church to buy the thousand guns messenger book dims the dollars for that same congress for some type of suspension response must use me for kindness team off to bad we should . all take the. i will be looking. to move the time when they

i'm not particularly -- i guess i need more conversation and thought about the over all kak. are they conflicting from your interpretation? or are they prior to -- potentially complementary? what is your read? >> i want to know how you see it if you are not comfortable with supervisor peskin -- >> i don't mean it like that. i'm not sure i am convinced that having a limit on dispensaries is for the industry in general. i want to have further conversation. that is what i am saying. i can understand the intent. the intent is if you are going to say you want to open up as many opportunities for everyone in general, the idea is may be two is not the right number. may be it is three. if we were to accept it today, we could have further conversation about it on monday is what the deputy deputy city attorney said. >> do you want to jump in for a second? >> to the extent that they differ, i would say that the amendment looks at the entire supply chain, as well as restricting that to one in each category. it focuses on the equity applicant as the individual and that permits. supervisor

>> no kak i just call -- called item. >> seven b. -- >> let's do it that way. >> so i was saying before that we would need a motion to administratively dismiss seven a and seven c. and then we would take public comment on that motion. so you will have an opportunity to address the motion but seven item b. is eligible for a hearing. >> so moved. i will make that motion. >> we have a motion from commissioner honda to administratively -- to direct the director to administratively dismiss item seven a and seven c. so on that motion, is there any public comment? >> do you swear and affirm the testimony were about to give is the truth? >> yes. >> thank you. >> i am the attorney working with the two appellants. this last-minute sandbagging is really unfortunate. because this is a complicated case that the owner is moving on and removing the tenants. without another application for a new stairway. no one has -- we do not have copies of them either. we need some time to submit real information on this project. we are building by building, losing existing housing by improvements, conversions and

as well as, and acknowledgement that we have a defined green zone and no permit kak. this role was put in place -- permit limits. this role was put in place to prevent a massive land rush for these storefronts. this rule was shared with our distribution list. if i can make a public service announcement, on our website, there is a blue field at the bottom of our homepage were all these individuals present and watching can submit their e-mail address so they can receive notification of our comments or regulations when they are posted so they may provide this comment at the time that the rules are open for comment. second, it was shared with the entire task force and the entire board of supervisors during the comment process. in anticipation of this consternation, in its most basic form, what this rule was seeking to contemplate is that we were not seeing land grabs without meeting the rigorous application requirements. requirements that we publicly disclosed in significant detail. prior to the release of the application. this would undermine the city's goal if we see th