has led to the fact that the canals that were requested from kakhovsk reservoir, water does not reachday, for example, it is the r9 channel, which is now located in the occupied territory, from this channel, many settlements located in the southern part of the zaporizhzhia region received water, so today , we we understand that now there are not so many people there, and there are still other ways of supplying water, including from the remnants of water that remained in this channel r9, some small reservoirs, but these resources will also be exhausted, and it becomes a big the question of how the southern part of the zaporizhia region after deoccupation should be provided with drinking water. to restore or not to restore kakhovska hes is a difficult question for various experts. if at the beginning some argued that it is better to give the dnieper its natural course and not to restore the gez, then now there are many justifications and ideas for its restoration. for the species composition that existed, yes, it will help, it is worth restoring, for the species composition that existed

inconveniences, even inconveniences, a certain trouble, after the russians blew up in june of this year the kakhovsks about this, mr. andriy, that we want to ask you in more detail, five months have passed, are you still feeling the effects? of course, we feel the same as the entire basin of the kakovsky reservoir, like you, how it looks in yours, how it looks in us, in us it first of all looks like the shallowing of wells, which in fact... fed the territory of novrontsovka and sekarivka from our community and accordingly, it was a challenge, a huge challenge to rethink and, in fact, rework the entire water supply in these two settlements, because the entire system was configured for taking water from the wells located near the reservoir, three out of four wells in novrontsovka silted up, one of the two wells in vysokrivka silted up, and now the second one, which feeds the zagorivka, is getting deeper and deeper every time and has to be cleaned, old debris and old garbage, in this well, we are actually talking about drinking water, so how, how has the bank itself changed and, well, let's say, the ban

let's look at these arteries, from kremenchutsi, for example, kharkiv oblast and donetsk region, and kakhovsk region provided the largest volume of water to irrigation canals for agriculture. and city cisterns. even remote berdyansk, standing on the azov coast, drank dnieper water. if the total volume of water in the cascade there is more than 40 cubic km, then 18 of them, almost half , are only the kakhovsky watershed. 18 cubic km, this could be enough to cover the drinking needs of the entire planet for a year. so, we saw that it was ours. strategic water supply, on which an incredible number of people, enterprises depended, agrarian. tell me, please, weighing now the pros and cons of restoring this reservoir , which opinion do you lean towards , should it still be rebuilt in order to feed all these thirsty farms, or leave everything as it is and find some alternatives? if i were an ecolomantic, i would probably be ... in favor of leaving it as it is and, well, not just as it is, trying to return the dnipro to its natural state, this is a general world trend, now in many developed countries