is kamazist ivanov to blame?rovoked a non-contact accident. inspector plotnikov is ready to explain himself, but it seems... causes interference, the second, avoiding a collision, flies into a pole or tree, or a tractor, in violation of the rules for transporting goods, floods the car with hot vitumum. such examples are given, in particular, by the supreme court in one of its reviews, that is, the main signs of a non-contact road accident are that, as a rule, only two vehicles are involved , and one of them is damaged without interaction with the culprit’s car. here, in the oncoming lane , two cars collided head-on, well, where is there no... contact accident, full contact, and the kamaz is in in his lane, didn’t touch any of these two, he has nothing to do with the head-on oncoming traffic, there must be at least some basis for accusations against kamaz driver ivanov, what did you rely on, what evidence do you have, self-propelled all the evidence, what kind of videos are recorded, on which nothing is visible, y