is the mckinley kantor book reasonably accurate? >> there is no middle ground on his book that i have one minor complaint. otherwise the 700 page magnum pulitzer prize a is an incredible piece of work. it does the impossible. it survives a 360 degree view of the prison, the personalities held with in it and outside of it. he used primary source material that, even to this day, some writers refuse to engage in. it is an incredible book. my one complaint is, as a words , he was an expert in words and wanted to use provocative and memorable words, and he picked one single term for prisoner shelter when prisoners used dozens of terms. shelter, tanned, hutch, borough, blanket, shantey. he picked -- shebang. only fourry is one of prisoners in primary source material right after the war, the trial in congressional testimony, 1200 pages of material, only four times does that phrase appear. january literally says, we called our shelter shebang. i am sure he did. it is a reminder, again, that prisoners are all different. some of them do but s