sergei karaganov, about the future of russia in the east.re, stimulated by the elites, the long-term slowdown in the development of europe clearly indicate the future of russia in the east, south, where... the center of the world is moving. and further, a decrease in the role of europe for russia. let's listen. the new geostrategic situation is urgently demands a return to the eastern turn of all of russia, through the primary development of all of siberia, including, of course, in the urals the sibilization of the entire country. europe has been closed for many years and will never be able or should become a first-class partner, while asia is developing rapidly. needless to say, we decided to go only through the far east, the least developed, although very promising region of siberia, by the way, but now we need to return to the original project, since the western and eastern siberian urals are much more developed in industrial, resource terms, and even in human terms, than even... the current far east, which has received a certain impetus

that we now do not need to use, there was no phrase about nato participation in karaganov.here is no need, and i propose that when ukraine, if the french troops go, the french troops, as i already said, will not be able to reach, this is complete nonsense, wait a minute, absolutely absolutely, macron is talking about that he really, please, he takes several squadrons of his planes, transfers them here with his missiles, oh, it’s unlikely that he will transfer anything even with these by plane. so no, they will hide behind ukraine, in fact , this is what macron said - this is most likely an attempt to put pressure on us after ovdiivka, because the situation is very simple, look, this is what is written in our doctrine: the conditions determining the possibility of using russian federation nuclear weapons are the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of the russian federation or its allies. france has such missiles. the use of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons by opponents weapons of mass destruction on the terr

had a phrase about nato’s participation, and karaganov’s question.

will not care about anything, america can only care about one path, which was described by comrade karaganovon, last year, here this may worry them, everything else for america is a way to make a profit. then, just now, they showed an interesting moment, when the same storm shadow missiles were in certain containers, they have developed a system for launching cruise missiles not from combat aircraft, but from transport aircraft, that is, an ordinary cargo transport aircraft. a plane, i don’t know, an an-12 flies, drops a container and these missiles open, that is , in fact, ordinary transport aircraft of ukraine can become a platform for launching missiles, well, there’s already quite a range big, american and european, so the way to interrupt this escalation, it seems to me, is only a big escalation, creating precisely well zones of danger for the enemy, you know, i , of course, if... i was talking about the fact that the conflict, if it reaches such level, potential for escalation and in terms of what weapons are used, where these... long-range types of weapons so that they reach deep into

they cross these red lines, they understand what these red lines are lines, they quote the same karaganovar weapons, they are afraid not only of this. russia because many people no longer like what the americans are doing, and a striking example of how they don’t like it is the middle east, which we are talking about now, because there the americans continue to behave like bulls in a china shop, make a lot of mistakes, blinken's new visit shows how coldly he is received in saudi arabia in egypt; many do not like what they are doing, the americans. syria and iraq, what happened may not everyone knows this, but mostly civilians suffered, including the deaths, because they did not expect that the strikes would hit them, they did not leave their homes, but what’s interesting is that the militants left, the equipment was taken out. this is to hit iran itself, now some very influential people in america are talking about this, for example. well, then this is a monstrous option after afghanistan, after iraq, the houthis in yemen just laugh at this, of course they will chew this weed with ephedri

we now do not need to use our nuclear weapons, there was no phrase about nato participation from karaganovso another question. the use of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction by opponents on the territory of the russian federation or in france there are such weapons. impact enemy to a critical state or military facility of the russian federation, the withdrawal and formation of which will lead to the disruption of the response actions of nuclear forces. such a blow has already been delivered to the base of our strategic bombers. the closest aggression against the russian federation is with the use of conventional weapons, when itself is at risk. you read the last ones it says not even nuclear aggression, yes it is aggression against our territory in 16 which if on our territory then yes next to the territory or flying never mind, will you take the risk of determining whether he has nuclear weapons or not , will you wait until he demolishes kursk , will you wait for a strike on moscow against st. petersburg, or will you decide to shoot down these targets? that we wo

transfer me to the second one card, i’ll reset it to 30,000, well, here we need to explain, as sergei karaganovrcises in the early eighties. elya, hello, it’s me, so you don’t think that these are some kind of scammers, listen, i’m sorting it out now something happened to me with my salary card, i can’t understand, but i need to pay the loan urgently, just maybe before the evening, well... put it on my other card, i’ll send it to you now , this second card, listen, sorry for the trouble, one way or only in person , let’s be okay with you, that i’m greedy, volodya, and don’t own gennadivech, don’t drink anything to anyone else, then we’ll discuss this in person, it seems to me very convincing, because you can’t even put a slick of suffering in a portrait added, at the end it was in close-up, yes convincingly yes, i would owe myself, probably yes... well, then with video deepfakes the same scheme turns out, while vladimir gennadievich is trying to figure out how his accounts were taken away, while they are trying to get him back, they are throwing off personalized ones with his contact here such