reason , in all seriousness, the topic is being discussed, and someone else names it, which means karamurzi was given 25 years. karamurze, who called for sanctions against russia, which came out with a sign that inserted sanctions lists, who said how to hit the sick, but won’t that change. what have you done to the american who would put up, say, the state duma of the russian federation with a call to impose sanctions against america and present a list of persons of any party, he would simply be trampled on, because there is absolute content here. therefore, when someone calls him an opposition politician. excuse me, what country is he in politics, he is a british citizen , he even told me two british passports he has a british passport, of course, excuse me, but we are not moldova where the president is a citizen, romania, but. in america there can be a citizen or a subject the other side to engage in politics, and then what if there is some kind of confusion in the minds of the british and american ambassadors and when the citizen deborah bruno speaks. listen to what she says, although ru

principle the rule of law official london summoned the russian ambassador or, in addition to the russian karamurzyritish citizenship bbc correspondent stand in rosenberg will continue in handcuffs and bulletproof aquarium this is one of the most famous critics of putin volodymyr karamurza he was charged with several charges , including high treason, a guilty verdict, the maximum possible punishment is 25 years deprivation of liberty, access to the courtroom was severely restricted, together with other journalists and foreign diplomats of us taken to another room to watch the broadcast of the court on tv for more than 10 years. volodymyr karamur, known for his anti-kremlin position. he helped convince western governments to introduce sanctions against russian officials for corruption and human rights violations. he also publicly condemned the war in ukraine. britain london has already condemned the actions of moscow zaporizhia the british government will continue to support him and stand in solidarity with him and his family we will continue to call for his the release of volodymyr karamurza has a

the words of britain, the united states and canada, which were made after the announcement of the karamurzict. this is a direct interference in the internal affairs of russia, the question of the british ambassador to moscow, braner, demanded that the court decision be canceled and stated that these missions will support arzu's karma and hope for his release, what can be said about this answer, we consider unacceptable the statement of the weakening of moscow, braner, after being issued by moscow the city court sentenced the citizen of the russian federation karamurzin in the case of the state defense council of changes and the dissemination of fakes of the russian army. otherwise, as an attempt to put pressure on the russian justice system. it really can not be called incomprehensibly. on the basis of coma, british diplomats are taken to judge the fairness of court sentences against citizens of other countries of jurisdiction that have nothing to do with london on the face of another example without shyness. hypocrisy is good for us. it is known how such cases the british side is acting, w

society oppression to disperse the opposition we there remember the stories about 25 years of the karamurziic summons about this continuous mobilization and so on, but the question is what is the background of those theses that collective the west will support ukraine until the logical end of the war with the victory of ukraine, the west is very worried and questions always arise regarding these very negotiations that you mentioned, to which we will be more and more often to push more actively as a species for yourself perceive this thesis regarding aggressive war and this tactic and who will be the topic of the horse that maybe there will appear some time with another proposal well look now the key point is that there is a unity of collective action and fortunately we we can talk about the fact that at some point in the medium-term perspective, there is nothing to indicate that this unity will be broken, this is the first very important moment, the second moment uh, still, now everyone is looking at uh, our uh, spring-summer offensive actually speaking for him a lot will depend on the resu

uh, to the extent that i can, vladimir karamurzi as his lawyer has a lot of cases that need to be continuer example, inclusion. eh , facilitating the inclusion in the sanctions lists of everyone who is involved in the criminal prosecution and this alone is the administrative prosecution of vladimir moz, even if they don’t think, they will remember all of them. this is absolutely absolutely unambiguous, by the way, from these lists, the future of a free russia will be quite easy. in fact, look. uh, whom whom law enforcement agencies already post. eh, already new russia should be very interested in someone to attract special attention. firstly, because it comes from lawyers from a lawyer who must know the laws. this is the first. the second one interested me, because i was not aware that mr. prokhorov and his like-minded people would soon have the opportunity to come to power in russia, and maybe, if they really want to come to power, they need to start a creative program, and not draw up execution lists, but i was struck by this degree of frankness. and well, here, uh, you know such things

statement on the word british neck of canada that were made after the announcement of the verdict of karamurziw, braner, demanded that the court decision be canceled and stated that together he would support karmurza hope for his release, what can be said about this answer, we consider unacceptable the statement of the weakness of moscow, braner, after the moscow city court sentenced the citizen russian federation karamuzi in the case of gossa changes and distribution of fakes of the russian army. otherwise, as an attempt to put pressure on the russian justice system. this action cannot be named. unclear. on what basis do british diplomats come to judge the fairness of court verdicts. here, in relation to citizens of other countries of jurisdiction, who have nothing to do with london , is another example without being shy. hypocrisy is good for us. it is known how the british side acts in such cases, hiding behind a dubious thesis. they're in dependence on one's own children's system is notorious for a clearly politically motivated decision against independent journalists. in particular, the v