russian state, not of the russian people, as nikolai alekseevich had a field, a counterweight to karamzeno speak, i treat with a sober view of their own capabilities and temporary opportunities as well, so i don’t try to attach this the format is no scientific or academic monograph, so there are no links to sources, because why isn’t it scientific? yeah, i’m not polemicizing with any of the modern authors, although if a professional historian on the topic reads my books, he actually has nothing new except the author’s point of view, that is, it’s not for him, in fact, yes, he will read the author’s point of view, that’s why that of course, some heroes are more attractive to me, i like potemkin, but i don’t like pugachev, but when i wrote about the decembrists, it will be in third volume, i was preparing a lecture, i planned one lecture, i had one view on the decembrists, it turned out that i broke my leg for almost a month, i sat at home for a month, i had time, instead of one lecture on the decembrists i got three, i read many sources, and my view of them changed several times, how inter