this was approved with up to 17 polling units. 13 residential parking spaces and to karcher spaces prevailed original project elected to provide the natoma site. the rate was 12%. the sponsor elected to provide three on-site at resulting in arrays of 18%. by choosing to elect [unintelligible] the program is a fee first program that allows projects to allow housing on site if they meet acceptable criteria. they are allowing the flexibility that goes necessary to contain construction financing. at the time the case report was published, the department had not received any public comment. since that time we have received 6 e-mails about -- of opposition from neighbors who feel the unit should be provided on site to insure the neighborhood is recouping its beer -- fair share of affordable housing. the department recommends approval because allowing the project to pay affordable housing will not modify the design of the project or impact its consistency with the planning code. the affordable housing fee is currently the first option for new developments and the department has little control over

a motion of intent for approval of 39 spaces inzv total from 32 single residential, to tandem, to karcheroner antonini: aye. commissioner borden: no. commissioner fong: aye. commissioner moore: no. commissioner sugaya: no. çcommissioner wu: no. president miguel: aye. i]>> the motion again fails. president miguel: is there any further commission comment on this item? >> the commission failed to take action on this item. the original motion stands. thank you. commissioners, you are now on item #9. 2500 bryant st. there is a note that falling public testimony, beacon -- the commission continue the matter to this stage by a vote of 5-0. the project sponsor was with his neighbor. commissioner fong was absent. commissioner wu was not on the commission at that time. çcommissioner fong, were you ae to review the record? commissioner fong: yes. >> and commissioner wu would need you to reduce her from participation. is there a motion from a roof -- for a refusal? on the motion to recuse -- commissioner antonini: aye. ñrcommissioner fong: aye. commissioner sugaya: aye. president miguel: aye. commi

another company in massachusetts, a karcher and comprehend is expanding quite rapidly. i can pivot from just focusing on being and not ignoring to now backing and helping entrepreneurs trying to build these great iconic companies and trade a lot of jobs. and more recently which is the context, the last year or so i spent a growing amount of time on public policy here in washington getting people focused on the role our partnership has played. the way i look at it, the story of america is the story of octopus. it was the work of entrepreneurs not just reading companies but entire industry that were based year. we kind of lost sight of that and people when they think about business tend to think of it in an overly simplistic context in terms of fortune 500 large compass, small business on main street. but the real leverage is everybody said is a these high-growth companies that really have the potential to great significant number of jobs. the foundation research on this i think is pretty telling that over the last three decades 49th of jobs have been created by the high-