use in terms of access to databases karen li use in terms of access to data bases anyway in karenases anyway in which we can quickly arrest and extradite people, these kinds of things, we will have to be them as effectively as we can and that will be more costly and slower and potentially put the public at risk, yes. let's speak to georgina wright, an independent brexit researcher, who recently provided expert testimony to the exiting the european union select committee on the impact of brexit on security. thank you for adjoining us. so, listening to cressida dick this morning, is she right to be concerned? i mean, obviously, this is one key area that would be quite heavily impacted by a no deal brexit. if you think of what happens now, the uk as a member state can access all sorts of eu instruments and data bases. access all sorts of eu instruments and databases. in practice it means it can share criminal records, it can share dna, it can share a vehicle registration numbers, all sorts of things as easily across borders and with other member states as it would within the uk. if t

karen mcdougal. obviously, those were blatant lies. so please follow along with me. you want to pay attention to this. it's important. i'm going to take you through the evolution of the lies. lies, lies and more lies. the evolution of the lies. it all started on january 12th when "the wall street journal" xwk broke the story that michael cohen arranged to pay stormy daniels $130,00 before the election to keep quiet about her alleged affair with trump. okay? cohen called the story outlandish, outlandish allegations and the white house dismissed the story. but one month later, cohen admitted that he did pay daniels. but he claimed it was his money and he wasn't reimbursed. this is what the white house said then. >> i've had conversations with the president about this. there was no knowledge of any payments from the president and he's denied all of these allegations. >> these people lie so much, it is crazy. have you ever -- and in april, president trump was asked directly about the payments to stormy daniels. >> mr. president, did you know about the $130,000 payment to

of cohen's sentencing and repeatedly claimed that cohen was lying, claiming he lied about plans to silence women like karen mcdougal. lying? roll the tape, please. >> i need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend david, you know, so that i'm going to do that right away. i've actually spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with -- >> so what are we going to pay -- >> yes. and it's all the stuff. >> yep, yep, yep. lying. but that was a conversation between michael cohen and donald trump about the plan for david pecker and the "national enquirer" to silence karen mcdougal. oh, but he's lying. so don't be distracted by the president's phony claims that the mueller investigation is a witch hunt no matter how many times he says that. >> it's a total witch hunt. i've been saying it for a long time. it's a witch hunt. that's all it is. they have phony witch hunts. the witch hunt continues. the entire thing has been a witch hunt. i call it the rigged witch hunt. the witch hunt as i call it should never have taken place. >> yep. he's going to keep sayi

admitting payments were made to stormy daniels and karen mcdougal, but he is dismissing them as simple private transactions. there's always an excuse for why he lied. but he can't keep his story straight. so remember when he lied about the payments when questioned by reporters on air force one? this was back in the spring. let me remind you. here it is. >> mr. president, did you know about the $130,000 payment to stormy daniels? >> no. >> then why did michael cohen make it if there was no truth to her allegations? >> you'll have to ask michael cohen. michael is my attorney, and you'll have to ask michael. >> do you know where he got the money to make that payment? >> no, i don't know. >> here's what prosecutors have to say about it. in their court filing, they flat out call the payments illegal campaign contributions. illegal campaign contributions. i want you to listen to this closely because this has been bugging me for the last few days. i just want to scream at the television when i see it. president trump and his apologists -- okay? if you're one of them, listen. working very hard to claim that this is business as usual. and even if it wasn't

. >> this is karen, my question, what your specific field you earn your phdin, and, in and hod you explain trump's daily lying. >> i don't think that trump specifically lies. my i have two masters and a phd in human and organizational development. development. i studied a lot about human behavior. within the system. within the political system, went the business system, went the global system that is been my focus, how does that one person fit into the whole group. >> jim acosta, cnn. >> yes. >> and donald trump your take? >> i think it is about reporter, doing apo disservice to other reporters, to his audience, i believe, i am a huge advocate of the entire bill of rights, but certainly first amendment, i think that i am glad that cnn for example, has i think number of 50 reporters that cover that do cover the white house, acosta is just one of them, i believe in a free press, i would fight for that you know, to my dying day. so, that is where i am on that. i understand the frustration of the president he feel his message is often not communicated or communicated a honestly. i think that is a problem, i wish the media was just report the news, unless you

karen. was the specific field that you had your ph.d.o and and how do you explain trump's daily life? >> i don't think trump is someone who lies. if there's a specific question that you refer to i would be happy to address it if i can. i have twod, masters degrees ana ph.d. inhuman organizational development so i studied a lot about human behavior. human behavior within the system because the political system in the business system andnd within the global system. how does that one person give an opinion to the whole group. >> host: jim acosta "cnn" and donald trump. what is your take? >> guest: the reporter is doing a disservice to other reporters and his audience. i certainly believe and i'm an astute advocate of the entire bill ofte rights but certainly e fifth amendment and i'm glad "cnn" for example, think it's around 50 reporters thatt do cover the white house and jim acosta is just one of them. to believe in a free press very strongly and i would fight for that. until my dying day. i obviously understand the president where he feels like his message is often not completely committed to get a door communicated honestly. t

conspiracy with michael cohen to payoff stormy daniels and karen mcdougal for their silence in the last days of the presidential campaign. i am proud that i lied to the american people about my pursuit of business deals in russia during the presidential campaign. how long would it take? nancy pelosi pointed out that donald trump was lying in the room today, but she used big words, so trump didn't actually understand what she was saying, and so after nancy pelosi says, he was lying, donald trump actually says, i agree with that. here it is. >> the president is representing his cards over there are not factual. we have to have an evidence-based conversation about what does work, what money has been spent and how effective it is. this isn't -- this is about the security of our country, take an oath to protect and defend, and we don't want to have that mischaracterized by anyone. and i -- >> i agree with that. >> the mischaracterize era grizzlies with that. -- mischaracterizer agrees with that. he made the mistake of putting his terrible performance on the camera today because he believes the camera loves him and he obviously really loves the came

karen mcdougal. the president spent months and months lying about hush payments to them. he made them out to be liars and now we know he lied his lies straight. money has pleaded guilty in his role paying off the women. charges were brought in federal court by prosecutors. about a dozen women have bla publicly accused the president of sexual harassment and misconduct. the president says he's lying. he even called one of this many too unattractive for him to have ground. he threatened to sue them. it's a he said, she said, he said, she said and so on. had it com when it comes to allegations about his behavior is often a lie. the president will use these tactics to try to destroy the people making the claims. the president has done little to dispel the sexual allegations of these women and this week has bolstered the word of at least two of them. he says he gave robert mueller substantial information and says unequivocally the president is not telling the truth when it comes to the russian investigation. more on michael cohen's startling revelations next. welcome to the place where people go to learn about their medicare opti

stormy daniels and karen mcdougal, that mueller is saying cohen has been in contact with current white house officials about those payments. and that paul manafort is somebody who liedbout his contacts with administration officials and we are left asking the questions, why were they all lying? what were they trying to cover up? and what was paul manafort trying to do? was he trying to coordinate a story with the white house so he could get a pardon? and the question we're left with is, where is the president in all of this? >> and i think on the point of lying, things really are starting to come into focus. we've had a little bit of a narrative that so what if the president of the united states lies to the public, he lies all the time. i think what we're saying now is it is potentially a lie to the public if it's an effort to get your story straight and coordinate false testimony for federal investigators or congressional investigators. you know, another observation, if this is what is in incredibly restained technical court filings, what is going to be in this mueller report? i think this is all leading up to, you know, that if confirmed, bill barr may be in a posi

taxes, how he lied to banks, and also how he illegally tried to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential campaign. that, of course, referring to the hush payments that were made to karen mcdougal and stormy daniels, two women who said that they had affairs with donald trump. now a key passage from that sdny filing says that after cheating the irs for years, lying to banks and to congress and seeking to criminally influence the presidential election, cohen's decision to plead guilty rather than seek a pardon for his many bold -- manifold crimes does not make him a hero. this will be a blow for michael cohen and lawyers arguing that michael cohen should get no jail time because of the extent of his cooperation with investigators and also because he is committed to helping the government get to the truth. the sdny clearly does not agree with that assessment. m.j. lee, cnn, new york. >> thank you. >>> president trump appears to be brushing off the implications of these memos from looumueller team. >> he's tweeted out the response to the 47 pamges now, what is h saying, what is the white house saying? >> hey there. yeah, the president brushing off these sentencing filings

karen mcdougal he played an orchestrating role in that event. . it certainly looks like prosecutors are very curious about who coached michael cohen when he went to congress and lied about the timing of the moscow deal. there's that sort of halo around that, was the president the person coaching him. that has to be one of the things all of this moves towards. i think the other thing in all of it is, you know, my friend nick wisely told me a very long time ago this is like watergate and if you just focus on the fact that something was stolen and people scrambled to cover that up you get somewhere. but also it's watergate for dummies because there's a lot of very ignorant unsophisticated people. >> i've watched a lot of episodes of "law and order" and "law and order svu" and "csi." natasha, let me get your reaction from your vantage point of acreporter covering all of this. the documents released on friday your impressions and in your answer talk about just how much trouble the president and his administration is in. >> yeah. so my biggest takeaway from friday's bomb shell revelations is that mull certificate laying the ground work to investigate trump's businesses