so i'm interested in your opinion on the statement of the admiral karg on the one hand. he said that russia china they want to uh deny international law, those rules, apparently he had in mind some universally recognized rules by which international systems have long been functioning. and on the other hand , literally in the same statement. he says they have actually challenged american leadership, and they are aware that there is something he put forward and in general international law, which guarantees american leadership and which equates resistance to american leadership, but to a violation of international law, what do you think? well, uh, actually. here mr. kirby, he very succinctly expressed the basis of american foreign policy ideology, er, according to which there is a certain order based on certain rules based on certain rules. well, he attracted from here for a red word, but in fact it means the rules that, uh, well , carry out in life, so to speak, washington allies, and here is the united states is the guarantor of these rules. that is, as if legitimacy is