alan: it is a german fallacy, that since the days of karl marx, who was a very german person, that economics determines everything. ulrike: it does. alan: europe was a tightly knit economic unit before the first world war, and they threw it all away, they destroyed this, and we have not recovered since. europe, europe is totally capable of self-destructing once the demons of european nationalism are unleashed, and this is what is going to happen if the, if the brexit people win. that's what i'm worried about. if germans sit back completely and say, they will have to take their method in, like the german medicine, likedrig --their the german finance minister said, you don't understand how everywhere in europe except for germany itself, people's blood begins to boil at that. this is what is destroying europe. derek: i would be with ulrike at this point if we did not have what alan described, this populism and nationalism, this talk sing mix across -- toxic mix across europe. the notion that the rules will continue to work, and it is a clockwork that will keep taking and britain will be a small

and karl marx who has undeniably brilliant criticisms about capitalest society but overall the ends justifies the means is a marxist concept, not a religious concept. the idea somehow that you can just enslave people. the prophet said that there is three people that he will be an advocate against on the day of judgment. and one of them was [ speaking in a foreign language ] you know, the one who sells a free person. you know, and omar wrote about taking people as slaves in egypt. he said [ speaking in a foreign language ] when did you -- what right do you have to enslave people that their mothers gave birth to them in freedom? you know, they're free people. so this idea -- slavery is an anathema to the islamic tradition. there is a component of historical islam of indentured servitude which was a way of reintegrating war refugees and victims into a society. we have in our islamic law the anybody who is in indentured servitude to get money from the public funds to be freed if they so desire. and so this idea of modern chattel slavery has nothing to do with islam at all. so what these

they were selling karl marx's communist manifesto. they were selling that. i purchased that there. they were selling rules for socialism and teachings for socialist books that i purchased and they were selling a variety of other books by authors who were -- dedicated their entire lives to karl marx's teachings and kind of reiterated them through their own remarks and books. so when i read through all of that what i found was that they've actually had a long-term ball game in terms of how they've really hijacked the women's movement and some of the ideas that we see today with the whole -- you know, the life of julia, i don't know if you guys remember that, but it's basically about the government taking care of women from birth to death. a lot of this is talked about in the material which was published in the '70s and '80s. that was the most interesting part about what i found at that conference. other questions? >> how do you think that we as individuals can fight the left narrative of women being victims? >> i think using their own arguments against them is a really good way to fi

i want to use this term, i got this also from karl marx. by metabolic rift i mean a break in the chain of nutrient cycling first on the farm and then between the city and the countryside. with traditional sources of fertilizer becoming waste and new sources of fertilizer needed. what we will see then is the industrialization of soil fertility. the transnational story, i will tell it that way, with a focus on the united states. before talking about that, let's step back for a minute and look at what soil and soil fertility is. soil is one of the most important natural resources. it is the result of several processes. the first is simply the breakdown of what is called parent material like rock and sediment into loose matter that provides minerals for plants to grow. the second is the breakdown of organic material which combines with this broken down parent material and gives soil its physical, neural structure. finally, recognize soil as a living thing. there are all sorts of insects, worms, microorganisms at work in soil that are critical t

later on, karl marx, in his theory of the critical economy, use of economic structures understand the modern world, using a series of -- theory of its -- we've talked about that before. in the context of race and pan-germanism, he saw the race as a positive force in history. being black was not a negative. it was a positive. it was who he was. he wanted to explore that. later on he came back to look at that. after he left germany, he went back to harvard and completed his doctoral studies. in his last years, his writing, he takes a job at another university. he had looked at many schools. he could not get a job. they taught classics and modern language. by the classics i mean greek and , latin. he also taught science and biology. he developed two lists when he was there. he was a young man in town. he was wearing the top half, as a german would. he wore three-piece suits all is nice -- his nice shoes. he is invited to dinners almost every night, and he is a young man. so he is thinking maybe about marriage or his future. so he sees these young ladies, everyone inviting him to dinner,

and karl marx later on in this period of economic structures to understand the modern world using theories and the dialectical. we've talked about before. in the context of race and pan german is him, he saw the race as a positive force in history. being black was not a negative. he wanted to explore that. he came back to look at that. after he left germany, he went back to harvard and completed his doctoral studies. in his last years as he is writing, he takes a job at another university. he could not get a job in other places. they taught classics and modern language. i mean greek and latin. he also taught silence -- science and biology. he was a young man in town, and of course he was wearing the top hat as a german wood, three-piece suits all the time, spats on his shoes. he is invited to dinner's almost every night, and he is a young man. so he is thinking maybe about marriage or his future. so he sees these young ladies, everyone inviting him to dinner, so he made two lists. on one list was the young women who could speak french, whatever, could cook, serve tea instead of [indiscerni

treatise, combined with his events of religious-based toleration to contrast an idea advanced by karl marx in "the communist kapital"" and "das that guaranteed the longevity of his relevance. harvard university in the spring term of nation 56, to cite just one example, the suggestive paper topic for a core humanities course included the rationale for revolution, labor and property. the liberal tradition in america, published in 1955, use the pervasiveness of the lockeian spirit to account on how they failed to predict socialism's eventual success in america. in the liberal tradition, marx's name appears beyond john locke and jefferson. mill appears in the liberal tradition in passing, twice in a 19th-century english context. the thought that mill and marks -- marx were never paired, but when they were as happened frequently mention 48, centennial of the publication of the commonest manifesto, mill's fared poorly. milne friedman's position at the eighth annual meeting of economic history association in september 1948, at this meeting, commemorating the centennial of the two publications of

they were selling a variety of other books by authors that were dedicating their entire life to karl marx teaching to reiterate them through their own remarks so when i read it through all of that i found out they had a long-term game, they hijacked the women's movement and the ideas that we see today with the life of juliet and of you remember that but the woman going from birth through death a lot of that was published in the '70s and '80s so that is what i found at that conference. >> how do you think that we as individuals can fight the left narrative of being a victi? victim? >> user of an argument against them is a good way to fight their ideas. for example, this is one notor of many but if you are a negative for the second amendment for women to defend themselves in the third wave feminism would argue you should be antigun then your response is isn't it that it advocates for women to be individuals to take care of themselves? that is what i am doing where you forcing me to be reliant on a the government or the police for my own protection or safety? isn't feminism about being an in

karl marx communist manifesto. rules for socialism and teaching for socialist book that i purchased and a variety of other books by authors that had dedicated their entire lives to karl marx teaching reiterating them so when i read through all of that i found out they had a long term ballgame with the women's movement and with those ideas of today at novi remember the life of julia but the story of birth to death that was promoted in this material that was published in the '70s and '80s that was the most interesting part of what i found. >> other questions? >> howdy think we as individuals of of narrative of women being victims? >> i think using their own arguments against them is a way to inside that victimhood for women for example, at of many but if you are an advocate for the second amendment for women to defend themselves feminism would argue should be anti-get your responses isn't it that feminism advocates for women to be individuals to take care of themselves? that is what i am doing wire you forcing me to

in our colleges and universities in united states, critical theory, which can be traced back to karl marx. he hasn't undeniably brilliant criticisms about capitalist endety, but overall the justifies the means is a marxist concept. it is not a religious concept. the idea that somehow you can just enslave people. the prophet says there are three people that he will be an advocate against on the day of judgment. the one whowas sells a free person. about taking people as slaves in egypt. when did you -- what right do you have to enslave people that their mothers give birth of them in freedom? -- the slavery is an an anathema. it was largely a way of war victims and refugees into a society. we have in our islamic law the ability of anybody who is an indentured servitude to get money from the public funds to be free if they so desire. the idea of modern chattel slavery has nothing to do with islam at all. what these people are doing is not medieval, dark ages. it is a gross distortion. i am not going to deny -- i spent enough time in premodern books another is some really weird stuff in premod

colleges and universities in the united states, critical theory which we can trace it right back to karl marx and overall the end justifies the means is a marxist concept. it's not a religious concept. so the idea somehow that you can just enslave people, the prophet said that there's three people that he will be an advocate against on the day of judgment and one of them was, you know, the one who sells a -- a free person. you know, and he wrote about taking people as slaves in egypt. he said -- [ speaking foreign language ] . >> what right do you have to enslave people that their mothers gave birth to them in freedom. you know, they're free people and so this idea, slavery to the islamic tradition, there is undeniably a component of endurden chured servitude which was a way of reintegrating war and refugees into a society. we have in our islamic law the ability of anybody who's in servitude to get money from the public funds to be freed. if they so desire. and so this idea of -- of modern slavery has nothing to do with islam at all and so what these people are doing is not medieval in dark a