karri says access isn't _ increased sales. karri says access isn't just _ increased sales.n'tjust about reaching more disabled players, but future proofing the games industry. i but future proofing the games indust . , ., ., , industry. i still want to be -la in: industry. i still want to be playing games _ industry. i still want to be playing games when - industry. i still want to be playing games when i'm l industry. i still want to be i playing games when i'm 80. industry. i still want to be - playing games when i'm 80. i want to play games when i'm older. but my capabilities change as i age and show does everybody�*s. it's wanting to make sure games are still supporting people who have been playing all their life. everyone should be able to play — everyone should be able to play. you should be able to enjoy— play. you should be able to enjoy the same games as everyone else.— enjoy the same games as everyone else. enjoy the same games as eve one else. �* everyone else. untilthen, ben and cari can — everyone else. untilthen, ben and cari can still _ everyone else. untilth

start with karrie. go ahead and define what his statement is trying to say there. when you think about the allegations of president biden on the speakerphone, when you think about the trips on air force two to china and the dinners with photographs in washington, d.c. restaurants. go. >> very intentional in the statement to say not financially involved. remember, bill and dana and everyone on this panel. we all know a statement like that requires a lot of lawyers looking at it. i'm sure the white house, there was some conversation between what would be in that. a lot of eyeballs. every word is carefully chosen. the fact that he chose to characterize his father's involvement as not financial i think says a lot. if anything, i think hunter may have won the hour by getting out of being deposed right now but joe lost with that statement because i think it's indication that the committee should go forward and say okay, what involvement exactly was there? >> dana: i can't help but put myself in the shoes of the white house press secretary day, byron, who have a press con

. >> molly: let's bring in karrie. this is amazing. the secretary of state herself notes i'm mindful that no secretary of state has done this. besides making this as a unilateral decision, is she making herself in essence a judge and jury as far as insurrection comes? president trump hasn't been charged or convicted of this. >> taking away the right to vote in maine who want to vote for donald trump. it's stunning a single person could do that in a democracy like america. it is wild. i really think at this point between the colorado decision, what happened in maine last night we are hurtling towards chaos if the u.s. supreme court does not get involved. >> molly: should the courts get involved? we expect this decision in maine to be legally challenged, as in colorado. >> at this point i think the supreme court has to because the chaos that is going to ensue if states starts unilaterally removing the gop frontrunner from the ballot and depriving people of their right to vote for the candidate of their choosing, it will offend the entire