points, of course, as we are, well, who among us will grow up, remember the tv in which chumak and kashpirovskyere was only one tv for all. that's why it's not surprising. it’s just that during this time we probably matured, and they somehow most likely, in childhood in fairness, all the same, the alans, chumak and kashpirovsky, no one in the political programs asked their opinion, although the question was said in a strict manner. who controls here, of course, yes, then this same humanitarian technology. thanks for the reminder. in fact, the ideology of ideological constructs is part of humanitarian technologies in our time already, and not vice versa, not the technology of part of theology. well, uh, i'm just late here from you. this is what i heard once. uh, very often quoted honestly on you, referring to something not in vain in general, a story about rivers, titabi. i just sunk hmm because really mongoose knows. this is the place on the back of the cobra, which he eats, she loses her will. and his whole fight with her is aiming at this point in the middle of the cobra knows this too and th