i want to show you one video where you talk about kashpirovsky, considering that he is 85 this year.i am very friends with yuri gorny, he is a very famous person in the psychological community, because back in the soviet years he traveled around the country and promoted self-regulation techniques, a challenge, offering to enter into a battle of hypnotists with any of us, either gorny or me, and did not receive an answer, the effect of non-feedback is vicious, when you influence a person, you definitely need to watch him, because there can be so many consequences of negative reactions, and if a person loses consciousness, and if he... his blood pressure will rise critically, and if he will have an inadequate reaction to this hypnosis, influence, i won’t even see it, so influences through tv, without feedback, when i don’t even know that this person has died, when the kashpirovskys appear, when the authorities support mysticism, archaic models of thinking and an explanation of what is happening, it means the authorities are trying... to calm and deceive the people, did you meet kashpir

but kashpirovsky, the chumak, and these figures of mass culture, hypnotized the whole country from blueou remember. pensioner prokapenko will probably also... charge the water, but we will conduct a more visual experiment. with a piercing gaze, stepanych will now push the car for safety reasons, at least this one. from the protocol on the psychic stepanych did not give way, which became cause of accidents with other vehicles. is it really that simple? of course, it's not that simple. yes, the driver of the gazelle made an unsafe maneuver, drove into the lane, interfering with the suv, but there was no contact between the vehicles, so a cross-sectional examination is needed to find out for what reason... exactly the driver of the suv drove into the oncoming lane, whether he could have stayed in his lane , albeit having made a passing collision with a gazelle, but having avoided a head-on accident without answers to these questions, the accusation of pensioner prokapenka looks like let’s just say, it’s unconvincing , is there an examination on this matter, well, probably there is no exami

oncoming lane, as it is written, he pushed it, well, maybe, as i say, maybe i have the power of kashpirovskyhe power of thought, i stopped believing in santa claus back in the first grade, here was kashpirovsky, the chumak, and these figures, mass cultures, hypnotized the whole country from blue screens, if you remember, security, at least this one, from the protocol on stepanych will now push the car for the purposes of the psychic stepanych, did not give way, which caused an accident with other vehicles . is it really that simple? of course, it's not that simple. yes, the driver of the gazelle made an unsafe maneuver, drove into the lane, interfering with the suv. but there was no contact between the cars, so a cable-testing examination is needed to find out why exactly the driver of the suv fell into oncoming traffic. could he stay in his lane, even if he committed a passing collision with a gazelle, but avoiding a head-on accident. without answers to these questions, the accusation against pensioner prokapenko looks like, let's say. unconvincing, is there any expertise on this? well, pro