but unfortunately behavior recognition is getting rolled out in these cameras privacy expert kate crockford was. laws is the government breaking its constitution. states pretty clearly in the fourth amendment that united states persons that say anybody in the united states should be free from want less search and seizure so it's pretty clear to us that the c.r.u. that listening to someone's phone call or reading their e-mail constitutes a search simple question was should people know what its government is doing that's essentially what dianne feinstein said on the floor of the senate and they were debating if i say three out there is. that in december she basically said just that you know we can't tell people what we're really doing because if they found out they did this and you know that that is not an acceptable way to govern in a democracy elected senators also call reveal all your calls obeying the f.b.i. claims people miss so have no right to privacy you know professor mill richards do they have any legal grounding to do that at all i think to say that no one has a right to privacy wh

but unfortunately behavior recognition is getting rolled out in these cameras privacy expert kate crockford was. laws is the government breaking its constitution. states pretty clearly in the fourth amendment that united states persons that say anybody in the united states should be free from want less search and seizure so it's pretty clear to us that the c.r.u. that listening to someone's phone call or reading their e-mail constitutes a search simple question was should people know what its government is doing that's essentially what dianne feinstein said on the floor of the senate and they were debating the fi story out there is. that in december she basically said just that you know we can't tell people what we're really doing because if they found out they did tests and you know that that is not an acceptable way to govern in a democracy elected senators also call reveal all your calls opening the f.b.i. claims people on this so have no right to privacy you know professor neil richards do they have any legal grounding to do that at all i think to say that no one has a right to privacy