kate stacey from the city attorney's office. the language on page 41, lines 20 and 21 would go back to code language that exists now and that code language is -- well, the language on page 41 starts with an increase in the exterior dimensions of a building, including but not limited to, the features set forth in 136c25. the existing code language is -- excuse me. i have to find it. an increase to the exterior dimensions of a building, except those features listed in 136-c1 through 136-c24. and 136-c26. so it would still include the so-called pop-out in 136-c25, but it would return to the present code revisions. >> that is entirely acceptable to me and i think addresses through the president to supervisor tang what you're getting at and what i intended the amendment to do. >> ok. but i'm not sure that the -- i mean, the reason why i supported this out of land use committee is because i thought that this legislation actually was helping to streamline certain things that, you know, such as windows, dormers or so forth that we didn'