. >> i want to go back to the city attorney and give deputy city attorney kate stacy an opportunity toalk about grandfathering. >> go ahead. >> madam chair deputy city attorney kate stacy i want to clarify the temporary provisions for building of one and 20 feet in height or greater from the building is providing onsite unit the only expectation from the temporary requirements are buildings located in the mission nct regardless of their heights for the purpose of onsite housing or paying the fees the xemgsz exceptions from the interim gardener parenting provisions are either buildings one and 25 feet or greater or buildings located in the mission nct so for onsite. >> one and 20. >> i'm one and 20 ann marie found that. >> i hope that is clear the legislation as crafted only excludes building of one and 20 feet if offsite and fees provisio provisions. >> all right. thank you supervisor kim is your - >> question to the planning department. >> based on when supervisor kim was talking about maybe you can clarify for me and this is regarding the cap of thirty percent does it not present all

. >> please into the mike and deputy city attorney kate stacy and in section 4415 ms. hayward upgraded an amendment i'm suggesting clarifying language that language is not before you in written form. >> is there a substantive change. >> a change that makes that consistent with the small sites something that the see macy's put before the planning commission. >> is a reap not written before us or a fly-by your pants clarification. >> i can't answer that madam chair the language that moovd read into the record i'm suggesting some alternative language. >> i appreciate that i'll let you know i'd like time to review the lunge and chew on that you may read what you have and then we'll continue. >> so this the the last sentence of section 415 point it at a new in essence sentence defined in the subsection f and the small sites program my use the affordable housing fees to acquire sites and buildings consistent with the perimeters of small site funds as periodically updated. >> all right. thank you any discussion on this. >> family through the chair relative to that - can't mee

. >> i want to go back to the city attorney and give deputy city attorney kate stacy an opportunity tok about grandfathering. >> go ahead. >> madam chair deputy city attorney kate stacy i want to clarify the temporary provisions for building of one and 20 feet in height or greater from the building is providing onsite unit the only expectation from the temporary requirements are buildings located in the mission nct regardless of their heights for the purpose of onsite housing or paying the fees the xemgsz exceptions from the interim gardener parenting provisions are either buildings one and 25 feet or greater or buildings located in the mission nct so for onsite. >> one and 20. >> i'm one and 20 ann marie found that. >> i hope that is clear the legislation as crafted only excludes building of one and 20 feet if offsite and fees provisio provisions. >> all right. thank you supervisor kim is your - >> question to the planning department. >> based on when supervisor kim was talking about maybe you can clarify for me and this is regarding the cap of thirty percent does it not present all t

. >> i don't care if deputy city attorney kate stacy is here but we have a number of monthly technical amendments that are sitting before you - the city attorney can speak one additional one there are no through the chair to john gibner, deputy city attorney is ms. stacey joining us. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney yes. i believe she's an excellent her way. >> that's how we get things done. >> so there was one little typo that i noticed in rereading this over the weekend that is an excellent the findings at page 5 where oh, where did it go 67 - .0 one 5 needs to be changed to a comma there she is i was stalling for 7, 8, 9 ms. stacey sorry made that typo suggestion suggest to public comment and a number of additional changes on page 22 line 13 section 14415 insert the word income perimeters of the programs page 24, line 19 section 4 one 5 after zoning district insert as they existed an excellent january 2016 and on page 26, line 17 the same words after zoning district so is it read zoning district as they existed an excellent january 12, 2016. >> on page 27 same section at the sen

. >> please into the mike and deputy city attorney kate stacy and in section 4415 ms. hayward upgraded an amendment i'm suggesting clarifying language that language is not before you in written form. >> is there a substantive change. >> a change that makes that consistent with the small sites something that the see macy's put before the planning commission. >> is a reap not written before us or a fly-by your pants clarification. >> i can't answer that madam chair the language that moovd read into the record i'm suggesting some alternative language. >> i appreciate that i'll let you know i'd like time to review the lunge and chew on that you may read what you have and then we'll continue. >> so this the the last sentence of section 415 point it at a new in essence sentence defined in the subsection f and the small sites program my use the affordable housing fees to acquire sites and buildings consistent with the perimeters of small site funds as periodically updated. >> all right. thank you any discussion on this. >> family through the chair relative to that - can't mee

. >> i don't care if deputy city attorney kate stacy is here but we have a number of monthly technical amendments that are sitting before you - the city attorney can speak one additional one there are no through the chair to john gibner, deputy city attorney is ms. stacey joining us. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney yes. i believe she's an excellent her way. >> that's how we get things done. >> so there was one little typo that i noticed in rereading this over the weekend that is an excellent the findings at page 5 where oh, where did it go 67 - .0 one 5 needs to be changed to a comma there she is i was stalling for 7, 8, 9 ms. stacey sorry made that typo suggestion suggest to public comment and a number of additional changes on page 22 line 13 section 14415 insert the word income perimeters of the programs page 24, line 19 section 4 one 5 after zoning district insert as they existed an excellent january 2016 and on page 26, line 17 the same words after zoning district so is it read zoning district as they existed an excellent january 12, 2016. >> on page 27 same section at the sen

. >> i don't care if deputy city attorney kate stacy is here but we have a number of monthly technical amendments that are sitting before you - the city attorney can speak one additional one there are no through the chair to john gibner, deputy city attorney is ms. stacey joining us. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney yes. i believe she's an excellent her way. >> that's how we get things done. >> so there was one little typo that i noticed in rereading this over the weekend that is an excellent the findings at page 5 where oh, where did it go 67 - .0 one 5 needs to be changed to a comma there she is i was stalling for 7, 8, 9 ms. stacey sorry made that typo suggestion suggest to public comment and a number of additional changes on page 22 line 13 section 14415 insert the word income perimeters of the programs page 24, line 19 section 4 one 5 after zoning district insert as they existed an excellent january 2016 and on page 26, line 17 the same words after zoning district so is it read zoning district as they existed an excellent january 12, 2016. >> on page 27 same section at the sen

. >> deputy city attorney kate stacy and i have one recommendation mr.n offered changed to the affordable housing condition trying to anticipate in the charter is passed at the june 7th and the inclusionary housing are into effect that is language reflective of number one but two regarding the unit mix should be changed to reflect that possibility so i'll suggest just to at the end the first sentence the 7 studios and 10 two bedroom and three bedrooms adding language along the line from the inclusionary housing requirements change as discussed so there is not objective conflict in conditions that might require the applicant to - and that make sense. >> i agree. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> okay now i remember i'd like to see i know we're 98 percent on the design maybe back to the commission with the final design we can understand the there was an agreement i think i make that as an amendment to the motion. >> memo back that's fine. >> one of the ones ms. healthy brought feel this with the mayor's office i anticipate this coming with the ea

aaron peskin for all his work with our office on helping to make the legislation happen and to kate stacy from city attorneys aufss to draft and redraft this legislation over the last 2 months in short order, not a small amount of work. this ord nnss codifys the agreement major component included in the resolution sponsored by supervisor yee. this ordinance does 3 things, one, it setsfurcate new inclusionary housing requirement including temporary requirements for projects in the pipeline raising what we expect developers to build by 1 percent if they submit environmental application in 2013. 1 and a half in 2014 and 2 and a half percent in 2015 treating all development projects equally depending on the tame thisubmitted the proposing. it requires the city to prepare a economic feasibility study by july 31 of this year so the board may determine what the new inclusionary housing requirements are after the passage of proposition c on june 7. in the mean time, we have set interim control asking developers to build 25 percent. the first time the city required production of low income housing

aaron peskin for all his work with our office on helping to make the legislation happen and to kate stacy from city attorneys aufss to draft and redraft this legislation over the last 2 months in short order, not a small amount of work. this ord nnss codifys the agreement major component included in the resolution sponsored by supervisor yee. this ordinance does 3 things, one, it setsfurcate new inclusionary housing requirement including temporary requirements for projects in the pipeline raising what we expect developers to build by 1 percent if they submit environmental application in 2013. 1 and a half in 2014 and 2 and a half percent in 2015 treating all development projects equally depending on the tame thisubmitted the proposing. it requires the city to prepare a economic feasibility study by july 31 of this year so the board may determine what the new inclusionary housing requirements are after the passage of proposition c on june 7. in the mean time, we have set interim control asking developers to build 25 percent. the first time the city required production of low income housing