approval from the planning commission on a 6 to zero vote commissioner wu was absent i noticed katherine moore clearly expressed her opinions you have her quotes in the brief the project will be 10 feet lower than the height and set back of 15 and a half feet and contain two additional set back of 8 and 15 feet on the second and third levels from the rear facade the permit holders sent in letters from the adjacent neighbors and ms. murdock is a tenant of the adjacent building that has windows facing at about exterior courtyard she express those concerns indeed the discretionary review applicant not just happened to attend they visited the apartment building twice and the courtyard away was able to stand on its own as a source of light for purposes of comparison 3 hundred square feet is the size of the san francisco in your buildings the appellant has not raised issues of appeal she explored all those are the planning commission with the discretionary review hearing was held she participated in the planning process including the filing with the dr she presented to the planning commission i'm go

and katherine moore is a very strict about the drs. and if a request to a dr is made to the planning commission, and it is denied unanimously, by a list of commissioners including commissioner moore, you can be sure that they did not make a case that satisfied her standard. so, i would also like to answer the question about the door in the rear. that door provides the only access to the upper level of the house. so i did not hear anything from the appellants that would merit any change of a project of 125 square foot change from the current building with the two-foot extension in the rear. >> i never have worked a project this small. and i have been working on these projects for a long time. i have never seen one come forward this small, thank you. >> mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott san shes, planning department, the discretionary review hearing was held in april, 2014, 24th, and to my knowledge and from what i can find and any of the ement mails this was first each brought to my attention on saturday with an e-mail from miss smith don