>>commissioner kathrin moore: i want to make sure i understand the comments. you are addressing the equipment side on services something that could be solved in the library of equipment which could be used by others. that has been done for other elements buchlt i want to make sure about the discussion about cost prohibitive looks at the cost of health and lack of health. that's the provision of ducting and filter replacement. i want to make sure i understand that distinction properly because there is two parts to this particular legislation. >> yes, i'm sorry. >> did i hear you say that because cost prohibitive is not the entire thing but the aspect of delivery of services and equipment necessary to meet this new requirement? >> yes. >> thank you. >> having said that, i think we could not be clearly enough to understand the cost of impact of ill health in terms of lost wages and in terms of untimely death and that is what drives this thing and i would support your thoughts that this definitely extends to all construction with respect of who does it, where and

>>commissioner kathrin moore: it was a low grade garbage adding 100 cars to the site. it eliminated any possible recall of the importance of the stuart street side and completely ignored the existing context of any of the buildings next to it. it was an aggressive office building which was as an office building quite inappropriate in terms of it's facade treatment etc. had a strong push back from at least 3 commissioners. and also attitude -- used the public realm to exercise this for important purnsz. -- purpose. there were other issues involved. what stands clear for me is that it had a garbage entrance on -- garage entrance on the stuart street side and that was totally beyond comprehension. >> i recall being around that and a lot of issues revolved around land use. in that regard, i believe this project is appropriate for it's size, it's massing and design. my question is how do you honor events that happened here and is whapg -- what's happening here honoring the events. the use is not there. that's within this building and it's an interesting question on how you

>>commissioner kathrin moore: i would like to expand object that last suggestion to say the folsom street corridor get in touch with what we talked about yerl -- earlier is one of the chapter which captures these important bench marks and participates a documents existing space of the history of the building as it was used and perhaps finding some overarching way in the building it says some recall or some plaque of what this building used to be. they will i will feel comfortable what is the challenge for documenting history. >> can i say something about the san francisco history. >> as you are moving forward to really document and capture the most important important of san francisco history. >> is that amendment amenable, thank you. >> commissioner richards. city clerk: there is a motion and second to approve with conditions as amended to include ground floor double doors, six 6 months report back and wort with the san francisco heritage to recognize the history of the site, on that motion, commissioner antonini, hillis, johnson, moore, wu, that pass unanimously 6-0. places you on item

>>commissioner kathrin moore: is it possible do you ever prepare a summary of which buildings were added to the historic district that you mentioned. it would be interesting to know which ones they are? >> i'm not sure? which historic district? >> you said jackson square,alamo square. >> they are for existing designated properties. we weren't adding properties. >> we would like to see what they are because there is so much on the margin of all of that. it would be great for us to see. >> happy to provide that information. city clerk: commissioners if there is nothing further we can address the public comment period. public comment:at this time, members of the public may address the board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. when the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the board has close

>>commissioner kathrin moore: i ask for a specific item to be taken out of consent because this is basically correcting legislation at a level where there was indeed a loophole and lack of definition and i move that we approve because we originally unanimously perhaps with the abstention of commissioner antonini. move to approve. >vice-president cindy wu: commissioner johnson? >> i think the conditional use process works unless something is agreed that you don't want it. however i would, i'm going to approve this because i think the intent of the board of supervisors was to have that prohibition and i want to maintain the integrity of them to have that discussion and ain, this is not an approval that we are making at the planning commission level and would make at the board of supervisors and hopefully, commissioner antonini will resonate with the board of supervisors and the approval process works for the most part. thank you very much. city clerk: commissioners, there is a motion and second to adopt a recommendation for approval. on that motion, commissioner antonini, no, hillis, yes, john

>>commissioner kathrin moore: just to remind ourselves polk street falls into three distinct areas, lower and middle and upper polk. however this commission has looked at applications that come fln front of us who speaks of president chiu and as a neighbor in this area. he has very succinctly extended his helping hand because the slow tipping of the scale from a balance of 20 percent retail and businesses now to 32 increasing to 34 has many times been a discussion and so cases we have taken precaution and denial of applications. that doesn't apply to this one. i think there is a sense of general comfort with the people in front of us, i do though object to the presentation being made to us that these are the reasons why we haven't contacted these neighbors. anybody in town knows that this is a group that speaks together, stands with each other and helps each other in the transformation of polk street. polk street has many many issues. however the point i'm trying to make is i happen to use polk street as a retail street for nob hill which the primary board for any kind of source. polk str

>>commissioner kathrin moore: i would like to ask the representative who are now presenting the academy of arts to give an update on the academy. i believe that update is a little thin relative to the detail many of us have spent on it over the years. i do think the public as well as the commission deserves a slightly more detailed update because we have asked for detail questions. the second point is in yesterday's e-mail i received a wonderful copy of san francisco heritage with a draft on the cultural history of the city. it takes like snapshots of particular events and buildings and places. i understand historic preservation had a presentation by heritage. i am wondering if we can have a similar presentation? because ultimately we at least should know what -- while it does not influence what we do, it gives us a broader understanding of the larger issues which tie it altogether. would you consider that to be possible, director? >> absolutely. we can work with the chair to make that happen. >> thank you. >vice-president cindy wu: commissioner richards? >> i was surprised to receive t