. >> after katrina fema made people's lives worse.were awful. >> fema was also run by someone who was put there in a patron edge position who had no idea how to run the agency. >> isn't that how it happens in government? >> no. it could be run by people who know the specifics who know the expertise. >> techno crabs with expertise easy to i a sume they would hire the right people. he was smart he went to harvard. those experts will make sure they get changed the right way. >> he worked at the department of homeland security. >> spending billions, how can you not be prepared? >>> oo big government does really well. >> the government experts make big plans. >> it makes sense to people. big disaster. you want to have the plan from the top. >> we have lots of plans. >> we could not catch more than 6 percent. >> wal-mart was praised for its relief effort. >> why would wal-mart do it better? >> their business is to make money. they have a sophisticated weather system that allows them to track where do we need to surge before the storm. peopl

. >> after katrina fema made people's lives worse.hey were awful. >> fema was also run by someone who was put there in a patron edge position who had no idea how to run the agency. >> isn't that how it happens in government? >> no. it could be run by people who know the specifics who know the expertise. >> techno crabs with expertise easy to i a sume they would hire the right people. he was smart he went to harvard. those experts will make sure they get changed the right way. >> he worked at the department of homeland security. >> spending billions, how can you not be prepared? >>> oo big government does really well. >> the government experts make big plans. >> it makes sense to people. big disaster. you want to have the plan from the top. >> we have lots of plans. >> we could not catch more than 6 percent. >> wal-mart was praised for its relief effort. >> why would wal-mart do it better? >> their business is to make money. they have a sophisticated weather system that allows them to track where do we need to surge before the storm. p

familia familiar, probably familiar with the problem, exposure from hurricane katrina when discovered from the plywood of the fema trailers. of orns out those typesf models were very, very narrowly at a certain type of health effect when a single chemical bl can produceoo a range of health effects. by looking narrowly as a certai effect, you can down play the chemical hazard, the risk of the exposure and what has effectively happened is that nu theseme studies have been used delay the regulation of numerous chemicals. >> doeso, what is a pbk study r formaldehyde show, liveim animae testing and other sorts of experience. >> it could show you there are different type of conferences that have been associated with formaldehyde. different types of respiratory effects. but if you look more narrowly, at these studies, you could look at one type of cancer and not the other and come out with some conclusions that could say well, we're not seeing the association between formaldehyde and leukemia, for example, when in fact you may have lots of people who are suffering from leukemiar who had a formaldehyde exposure. that cou