before i move on to the next steps, i want to touch on professor kauthorn's independent review. his findings, his memo found awss now and in the future needs to maintain high seismic reliability. agrees with the assessment. and the analysis are reasonable and valuable source of information to select options, more rigorous reliability are needed. we are starting that analysis as we speak. we concur. the current awss he also found has a shortfall to serve the richmond and sunset district, again we discussed in options 1 through 7. we can't just expand the existing awss. also found for about the same cause for the richmond district only, both richmond and sunset can be served using a potable network. due to location, size and recent seismic reinforcement, the reservoir could be a source for the potable awss. also recommended a phased implementation program for option 12, resulting in an integrated, multi-sourced highly reliable, in line completely with the chief and general manager kelly, agility and flexibility to add future water sources and have the design so it can expand to fu