on narrow tailoring and compelling interest, it is notable, i think, that even judge kavanagh that the government ought to be able to require these insurers to provide cost free coverage to this employees. he did object, however, to one small aspect of the schema where the government cannot justify one spot asked back of the scheme, which is the requirement you identify who your insurer is when you opt out you have to say and i've hired at not. it about 90% of the cases that does not matter because the employers big knowledge publicly who their insurers are. it's not obvious that this actually matters to any of the petitioners, but it is something judge kavanagh pointed out, so-- and i don't think it's a very strong argument that the government has to the extent there is a petitioner out there who really cares about having to identify their employer for the government and thereby help the government with this scheme. i am pretty sure the justices will say the government does it have a justification for requiring that identification, but that just sort of punts the case to a bigger ques

being considered, which is defunding planned parenthood's non-abortion .elated services as judge kavanagh of the dz circuit explained recently in -- dissent, providing seamless access to contraceptives, which is a large what planned parenthood does, reduces the number of unwanted pregnancies, furthers women's health, advances personal and national opportunities, reduces the number of abortions, and helps break the cycle of poverty. the horrible irony here is that defunding planned parenthood -- rather, would increase the number of unintended pregnancies and drastically, i fear, increase the number of abortions necessary in this country. thank you. oden, welcome. ms. oden: thank you so much for your time. 327,653. this is the number of abortions 2014planned parenthood's as having beents completed that year. do i find this horrific? because i actually have a lot in common with them. i was meant to be one of them. just another been statistic, but by the grace of god, i am more than a statistic. i come to you today as a wife, a , a mastersister level social worker, and yes, and abortion survi

as judge kavanagh of the dc circuit explained recently in his dissent providing seamless access to contraceptives which is a large portion of what planned parenthood does reduces the number of unintended pregnancies, furthering women's health, advancing the personal and protective opportunities. and helps break the cycle of poverty. the horrible irony is that defunding planned parenthood would increase the number of unintended pregnancies and drastically, i fear, increase the number of abortions necessary. thank you. >> welcome. >> thank you for your time. this is the number of abortions that planned parenthood's to the 14 fiscal report lists is being completed that you. based upon these numbers 897 children will lose electron abortion completed by planned parenthood each and every day. why do i find this or if it? i have a lot in common with them. i was meant to be one of them. i should have been just another statistic, but i am more than that. i come here to you today is a wife, mother, daughter, sister, masters level prepared social worker and an abortion survivor. from a botched abortion to t