chairman.dge... >> ...brett kavanaugh... >> mr.irman. >> ...to serve as associate justice... >> mr. chairman... >> grassley is, like, 13 words into his remarks when they start badgering him. >> you are out... yoare out of order, i'll proceed. >> we cannot possibly move this hearing...airman, with >> i extend a very warm welcome... >> we have not been given an...d >> tocrats had agreed that weekend that they should do this. >> mr. chairman, ippeal to the chair to recognize myself or one of my colleagues... (gavel banging) >> you're out of order. >> mr. chairman, i, i appeal to be recognized on your sense decency and integrity.. >> mr. chairman, if, if we cannot be recognized, i move to adjourn. >> the american people... c >> mirman, i move to adjourn. (protesters shouting) >> ... travesty of justice. this is a traves of justice. we will not go back. cancel brett kavanaugh, adjourn the hearing. >> we're here to say to be a hero! be a hero... (inaudible) (protesters continue shouting) aring.t's no way tconduct a i think that the proce

brett kavanaugh would be his crowning achievement.mera clicks) >> it's moving the court to a really very, very conservative court. the time he was first am from senate, and maybe his dream when he went into politics. >> this is going to be a rough battle on capitol hill... >> narrator: mitch mcconnell's determination to transform theco supremt had been his life's work. senators, u.s. supremeveral nominee clarence thomas managed to... >> potentially ensuring a conservative majority for decades... >>arrator: through bruisin confirmation battles... >> ...democrats to keep an open mind about kavanaugh... >> narrator: a struggle overlo id and power... >> ...white house has been packaging clarence thomas like a political candidate... >> ...expected to be one of the most contentious confirmation hearings in memory...gn >> narrator:ed by a devastating defeat... >> ...rejecting the nomination of judge bork... >> ...judgbork, the long public ordeal... >> narrator: and a promise to retaliate. >> the administration is marshaling all its resources

justice kavanaugh: well -- mr. kedem: but that would not be -- justice gorsuch: well, once -- but then the camel's nose is under the tent, isn't it, counsel? intent matters except for when it doesn't? knowledge matters except for when it doesn't? mr. kedem: no, your honor, mistake of fact is an affirmative defense that has to be raised -- justice gorsuch: no, i'm -- i'm saying there is an affirmative defense. so we're just going to recreate this as an affirmative defense throughout? so -- so what's the what's the delta between the defendant's position and the government's position then? mr. kedem: it's whether it has to be proven in every single trial, just as justice gorsuch: well, let me ask you, just to -- just to follow up on -- since robert jackson's name has been invoked here, morissette, "the contention that an injury can amount to a crime only when inflicted by intention is no provincial or transient notion. it is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will an

justice kavanaugh: ok. mr. sommer: well, if there's no further questions, i would simply say -- justice alito: well, what about where -- if -- there may be words that are almost never used, actually, to express what the word literally means. they -- and the word your client wants to use is number one on the list. like, 99% of the time or 95% of the time, it's not used to express what the word literally means. it's just used to say, i'm mad, i want to get attention. it's like shouting. can it be -- can that be distinguished on that ground, that -- that it doesn't express any sort of viewpoint? all it expresses is an emotion, a way of -- of expressing something. mr. sommer: well, i think two -- two responses. one, i think you've already decided that issue in tam by unanimously holding the giving offensive viewpoint. justice alito: no. well, tam involved the expression of an idea, and -- and so there was viewpoint discrimination. mr. sommer: well, because of your decision in tam, the -- the provision in the whole

former president bill clinton comes out swinging against brett kavanaugh.xt. >> s >> bill clinton arguing supreme court justice brett kavanaugh got what he deserved by being accused of sexual assault during his confirmation hearing because of the role he played as a young lawyer under kenneth starr decades ago. >> he didn't have any problem for over 3 years of what he knew was a total charade. >> bring the host of left coast news even bearman and seawright are at the heritage foundation, great to have you with us tonight. so what do you make of this? clearly the bad blood goes back several decades because the kenneth starr report investigating the clintons, we talked about this before, brett cavanagh was one of the investigators and he did spend years trying to get to the bottom of what happened including this. >> that led to the revealing of the scandal with monica lewinsky so there is bad blood between the two but i thought this remark was extremely revealing and i'm astonished that a former president would admit in front of the public that he supports us

of course we can all remember back to the brett kavanaugh hearings when brett kavanaugh suggested thatdealing with was in fact reveng revenge. revenge for his investigations into the clintons and the media democrats had a meltdown over that suggestion and now when he says this publicly, he did deserve this, everybody is silent and nobody cares. >> shannon: i want to redo something from the "washington examiner." he was a reporter at the time covering the report and he said that brett kavanaugh walked him through the signings. it said this, his report a model of fairness shot down all legitimate doubts and even provided some of the crackpots, clinton is wrongfully blaming the one man who more than any other definitively concluded that the death was indeed a suicide rather than a hit job. clinton should have spent 20 years thanking him and that seeking revenge against him. >> i couldn't disagree with quinn amore, it was under brett kavanaugh that they dug this grd conspiracy theory of vince foster which continues to run in circles on the internet. it is a ridiculous conclusion to put the

the democrats crashed and burned on kavanaugh. but not only did their stunt flop, their stunt actors were actually frauds and criminals. >> a lot of this would be substantiated if there was an investigation, which is what we want. we are not laying out all of the facts and all of the evidence right now. that is not our obligation. >> committee chairman chuck grassley to the justice department for investigation pit >> convicted of the crimes in the investigation, mr. menotti would face a sentence of 333 years in federal prison. >> laura: he was practically cohosting shows on cnn, wasn't he? but here we are, and democrats facing another brilliant legal mind with impeccable credentials. they went back to the prop closet once again. >> chicken barr should have shown up today and answered questions. he was afraid of barry burke, afraid -- and attorney general who was picked for his legal acumen, and he would not be fearful of any other attorneys questioning him for 30 minutes. >> laura: does he sleep with that chicken? i didn't know it

if you look at judge kavanaugh's record up to 12 years of service on the d.c.rd where he had the judicial philosophy that president trump campaigned on that he was going to appoint judges like justice gorsuch and justice kavanaugh those were the type of judges president trump was going to put on the bench. >> martha: we were watching the protests today on the steps of the supreme court. do you believe there will be a contest of roe v. wade? do you believe that there will be do you believe there will be a show down of that decision? >> i think democrats are trying to scare people here. roe v. wade whether you like it or don't like it, it is precedent of at supreme court it's been reaffirmed many times. judges are bound by precedent. especially lower court judges. i think these are a lot of presidential candidates on the democrat side who are just trying to scare voters and jockey for the nomination on the democrat side. >> martha: interesting. we will see where the openings come on perhaps the supreme court or other places on down the line. and we will watch wha

justice brett kavanaugh wrote: dc kavanaugh's 4 conservative colleagues slammed his legal reasoning writingjustice has charted since barely surviving senate confirmation last fall. he's been seen as a reliable conservative but not in lock step with his right leaning colleagues. >> are you saying each in the method creates brutal pain you can still do it because there is no alternative. >> kavanaugh ruled against the trump administration to block medicaid funding for abortion. john roberts is aligned with kavanaugh and may be setting up a shakey center of the bench. >> there are many issues where he has the potential to be the swing vote. i think you will see an effort by the lawyers to pick off that vote by justice kavanaugh. >> this allows the lawsuit to move forward before a lower court. >> shannon: we will track that one. david, thank you. our midnight hero is next and "finding the bright side" my book is out tomorrow. order online or where you like to buy books. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh

now, yes -- justice kavanaugh: and how -- how would we look at that? in a scheme -- individualized claim proceeding, administrative exhaustion requirement, that's all we know. what else do we need to know? ms. sinzdak: well, as the court said in -- in elgin, you look at the text, you look at the structure, and you look at the purposes. so you look at the text to see how intricate is this scheme and how comprehensive is it. does it seem to actually cover all claims, or does it seem pretty isolated? i think brown versus community -- or, pardon me, block versus community nutrition is an example of that. there, the scheme really wasn't comprehensive, and so the court didn't find that it precluded any -- any direct avenue to the district courts. so, after you look at the -- the text, you look at the structure. again -- and there's a little bit of overlap here. it's basically is there a detailed administrative review scheme and then -- that culminates in judicial review. again, you have that here. and then you look at the purposes. is this the sort of scheme

and honestly for the life of me, i just can't figure out what would make republicans think kavanaugh their side he's already been pretty, you know, balanced >> since my nomination in july, there's been a frenzy on the left to come up with something, anything to block my confirmation the behavior of several of the democratic members of this committee at my hearing a few weeks ago was an embarrassment this whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, revenge on behalf of the clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside left wing opposition groups. this is a circus [ laughter ] >> seth: i mean, holy [ bleep ] that guy is a supreme court justice now. can you imagine what his questions during oral arguments are like "i saw hillary clinton outside my house last night digging through my trash as part of a left wing conspiracy to steal my identity and make a mold of my face so she can wear it as a mask and rob a liquor store. [ laughter and applause this guy accused - [ a

>> that's no excuse for the kavanaugh behavior.m destroy a man's reputation based on lies. >> he made awful allegations against kavanaugh. the reason he became prominent was because of stormy daniels. >> so kavanaugh should thank michael avanati? >> in many ways. >> trump should be ashamed of stormy daniels. he paid her. avanati did not pay her. he took money from her. >> i never denyed it. >> go figure. >> and a fake quote from president trump. greg's monologue up next. alright, i brought in ensure max protein... ...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't (grunti)g i'll take that. (cheering) 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar ensure. for strength and energy. has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance c

first of all, with kavanaugh, today the court allowed a suit against apple to go forward. what was interesting there is that kavanaugh sided with the liberals. that's going to raise some eyebrows in the business community, but it also goes to show how little we know about kavanaugh. he hasn't been on the bench for the first full term yet, and so that was an interesting note. another thing is the death penalty. the supreme court has been squabbling in rare public opinions lately about the death penalty with conservatives saying that these prisoners are waiting too long, but today almost out of the blue we saw justice alito, gorsuch and thomas, the far right side of the bench, complaining about how kavanaugh and roberts had voted to put one execution on hold. it was so interesting because alito was writing and saying that this isn't good for the court whereas kavanaugh again wrote with roberts saying here's why we did it. we don't usually see that. finally, the court in general, we saw a separate case about precedent, and what was interesting briere, the liberal justice in d

jesse: you said that was a breaking point in that kavanaugh hearing. that wasn't planned.was spontaneous? . >> this is the most unethical sham and to someone who knows the truth. this will destroy the ability of people to come forward because of this crap. . >> how do you put yourself against an accusation and everybody said i don't know what you are talking about? it is frustrating when all the rules went out the door. i know brett and his family. and to have nothing to hide. and i spoke for a lot of people. >> and then you became a meme. [laughter] . >> so you know, the rule of law is about dispassionate analysis with facts. susan collins gave the best explanation why a rational person would vote for kavanaugh and she did a wonderful job i try to imitate her why am i doing better? because most people are conservative and to give advice and to say lets me consider thi this. it works both ways. i enjoy my job. it is a great time to be alive. jesse: fox news has been having a lot of fun. >> literally having fun because people don't think he would do what he should have done

robert: he mentioned the supreme court, brett kavanaugh recently heconfirmed. is a thought in the republican party that this supreme court has moved to the rightecause of the confirmation of kavanaugh and for that reason thiss thise moment? ntry, we saw missouri today and elsewhere. >> this has been part of a broader conservative strategy since 2012, we've seen legislatures pass laws with the intention to get something to the court to overturn roe v. wade. the fascinating thing about the alabama law is so much of the aborti debate is seen as between right and left but the alabama measure exposed the divide in the republican party. mccarthy said he thought the law went too far and the ahead of the r.n.c. said the law went too far and others within the party debating whether this was advancing the cause or whether laws like this will be thrown out in the courts and derail the cause, that they're not advancing the policy and are tho politicsivisive that you are turning away the voters you're trying to persuade? robert: is this now one of the key issues for 2020? >

do you think he would overturn it, kavanaugh, vote to overturn it? >> i do.sarah, another question. your landmark case was in 1973. women have had the right to choose for so long. do you think people really understand what they would be losing if roe is overturned? >> i think some do and some don't but i've been amazed in the last several weeks as i've talked to people in washington, d.c., in many of the states, for them to say to me, young people are the real driving force of the criticism of the attempt to overturn roe versus wade. >> what do you think, linda, this would mean if it is lost to women around the country? >> well, i think it would just be -- i think it's just a loss that many people can't even begin to imagine because i think without the ability to control a woman's reproduction that you really you just don't have -- it just -- it diminishes the -- your ability to achieve what you're capable of achieving in life. >> well, listen, this is such an important issue and we appreciate your time. we appreciate you coming in, especially since you -- yo

he was replaced by justice kavanaugh, who is believed to be anti-roe v. wade.hing that is interesting here is that kavanaugh is a lot like roberts they look a lot alike, they tend to be institutionalists. the question is will they go along? will they get sticker shock when it comes to whether they will overrn roe v. wade? many people believe that at least hn roberts is not ready for that. jane: we keep hearing about precedent, though. this law has been in existence for 40-oddears. is precedent going to be enough to protect the constitutional t ri reproductive rights? heavily:ei it will on john roberts. this is the type of thing that makes him nervous. but his whole career on the court has been to chip away at roe v. wade.ch thce for pro-choice advocates is twofold -- this is a direct assault, but it may not be the most serious threat. john roberts could reject tits, could blocrom being heard, but they could still grant review in these collateral attacks, chipping away, making it more difficult to get an abortion in various states. roffrts could very well sign o

i'm trying to help him where i can kavanaugh changed a lot of things for me.oted for -- now chosen andover qualified a and i watched destruction over 20 years for just out and out -- assassination and brett kavanaugh a good man not a bad man and they hate trump so much and all things trump so much i was a breaking point for me i'm not going to put up with crap anymore. i would have never done that and i think i spoke for a lot of republicans, and president rebuilding the military. count me in for that he's cut taxes economy is coming our enemies are on the notices and new sheriff in town. i just is like what he does judges has been great and i've got to know him personally. we still have some differences but getting to play golf with him and understand who he is and why he -- has been fun. >> you said that was a breaking point for you in that kavanaugh hear. so that wasn't planned that was spontaneous that eruption. >> this most unethical sham since i've been in politics. and if you really wanted to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn't have done what you

constitution brett kavanaugh his nomination through a significant wildcard into that calculation justice kennedy who is to see that justice cavanagh took was a pretty reliable boat to protect access to abortion there's really no reason or very little reason to think that justice cavanagh will do the same so we'll see so i understand here with a few perspectives from our community it says this is a nightmare this is about will mean women's bodies and making them feel less than human another person writes that people of financial means and political connections will always facilitate safe and professional abortion services through travel private doctors and hotels and will avoid the consequences. thank you so much for joining us and thank you for. 3. time. he added to. the passion the success and the popularity. and then he gave it all up. for the love of his homeland. the rebel stoves into the realm of footballing legend rashid look through free. to fool the algerian national liberation front with his feet rashid macleish and the f l n t on al-jazeera. stories generate thousands of headli

a plea is [applause] >> what about brett kavanaugh?e have due process what he was did he have due process when he was innocent proven guilty -- >> i'm only smiling because he got a really good job out of the whole thing. yes, i think he did. he had a process, and that process was a hearing before the senate. and that hearing went on and you evidence came out and that was evidence from dr. blodgett she came forward with her story. what bothers me is after my colleague said she was credible, hearing this basic, political, i think, response. he has a right to put his story on, but basically publicizing the whole judiciary with how he acted. i disagreed with that, and i was very surprised where i was simply trying to match his story with her story. you know, people can blackout and you don't remember what happened. instead of just answering that question, he went right at me and said, you know, basically have you blacked out. do you drink beer and all these things. i decided i could've gone down there with him but i decided, in my head, ma

i want to quote from justice kavanaugh's opinion.ever since congress passed the sherman act of 1890, protecting consumers has been the central concern of the antitrust laws. the consumers purchased apps directly from apple and they alleged apple used its power over the retail apps market to charge higher prices paired that some straightforward. jennifer: it sure does. david: 1890 sherman a. what is the issue? jennifer: how does this case fit into the case of an old supreme court in the 1970's? in that case, what the supreme court decided is an indirect purchaser of an item from an entity that allegedly monopolized and inflated those prices cannot sue under the federal antitrust laws for damages. whatever the person or entity was that was directly harmed by this inflated price. you would think this would be the app developers that sell through the app store and have to pay apple a 30% commission every time an app is sold through the store. these are the consumers buying and paying those apps. the first court said they are indirect pur

it is disgusting what is happening to you and brett kavanaugh and other people.welcome on the show. good to see you. hillary clinton's world grievance tour is going strong into the third year, massive discount on the tickets, but whatever. now she says america is lurching towards tyrrany because she is not the president. new polls show voters disagree, that is ahead. but first it is time for "final exam." can you beat our experts at remembering the weird things that happen over the last seven days? ♪ okay, paint a picture for me. uh, well, this will be the kitchen. and we'd like to put a fire pit out there, and a dock with a boat, maybe. why haven't you started building? well, tyler's off to college... and mom's getting older... and eventually we would like to retire. yeah, it's a lot. but td ameritrade can help you build a plan for today and tomorrow. great. can you help us pour the foundation too? i think you want a house near the lake, not in it. come with a goal. leave with a plan. td ameritrade. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: it is time for "final exam" where the news profe

what happened with brett kavanaugh, 5-4 republican to democratic appointed court now. they have a majority of the courts and brett kavanaugh has consistently said he favors rolling back roe v. wade and having additional restrictions on abortion and as a judge he has sided with additional restrictions. that's the play here. the play is to get this to the supreme court and either get an overturning of roe v. wade or significant restriction in pulling back of the roe v. wade case. >> in the near term, though, you are facing -- what folks in alabama are facing is the most restrictive abortion law in the united states likely to be -- assuming that kay ivy would sign this into law, she has six days to decide. that's the most immediate impact that people need to look at. thanks anne. appreciate it. >>> democratic candidate for president, senator michael bennet of colorado. thanks for being here. >> thanks for having me, kate. >> on this issue, what is your reaction to this move in alabama? how big aftery threat do you think this is to, as i was talking about with anne milgram

i would not have been with justice kavanaugh and fairness to apple, his case is not been litigated.an this case go forward, a trial judge said no, our friends in the circuit said yes. in the supreme court voted five to four, strange vote, said yes. the theory was, the overrule which is an old rule, requiring people to sign into the developer which tended to shrink class actions. >> you to spread a free market, i wonder if this is the bigger picture as a whole. and they are pushing on product- >> weight -- let me finish a sentence. the media channel at the top of the page. we will discuss later on, it happens to be a big problem, again and again, and again. >> forty-two state attorney general, and federal coat and federal pharmaceuticals in canada, they are suing is really company and a federal court to enforce several laws because the feds want to. they're claiming price taxing because they're charging too much. the free market wants is purchasers are willing to pay. david: will have a minute left her you better get in here jonathan. >> just because it's used by the public does not

this is not attractive to brett kavanaugh.his is an all-out ban, no exceptions for rape or incest. this is a cruel and heartless deliberate vehicle, but it doesn't look like anything that the court would bless, particularly thinking about going into an election year. the court has a long game, i think. john roberts has a long game. we know how he feels. we know i think how the five conservative justices feel about roe v. wade, and we know largely because of how they voted just three years ago in the texas abortion case. but you can do away with roe with a chip, chip, chip, slow erosion of rights. you can do it as i think the court had planned to do by just simply taking tiny incremental steps saying this too is not an undue burden. we'll close more clinics. we'll do what has been happening in red states for years, right? just say nothing is an undue burden. you have to pave the halls with gold, and that's okay. and that was a strategy that i think was going to work eventually at the supreme court when kavanaugh comes on the co

what happened to her after she said she saw kavanaugh in a gang rape and where are the journalists? don't need her anymore. it's all about publishing and end. greg: up next, story about politics, donuts and sports. what else do you need? ♪ ♪. greg: i was espn reviled? because he let politics run while but after some hard lessons the president of espn which is a sports channel now say it's yours are coming to them for political opinions which makes sense it being for sports and all. before this here is what has been going on over there. >> this is not the way political leaders behave and i understand that part of the fuel to appeal to the most debased part of his face. >> he was insulted them and childish. greg: meanwhile at dunkin' donuts vp for this at a conference quote, we are not starbucks or political but we are not going to put stuff on our cups to start conversations we want to get you in and out of our store in seconds. they hate their customers. i'm kidding. i hope this trend continues i'm glad dunkin' donuts want to give me my coffee and get me out of there. if only they w

brett kavanaugh joining the more liberal justices.ory of the law suit and one it could force apple to do. >> it could have enormous consequences for its platform and the app store. for that brand of phone, that is the only place you can get apps that have been designed and are sold for use on apple phones. i'm thinking interesting competition issues, is that a monopoly because no one else makes apps ourselves apps for iphones. other kinds of phones have absent a been developed that microsoft sells and google sells on their product stores as well. so that will shape up to be an interesting issue on the merits. as you point out, this decision was very much preliminary and about whether or not the plaintiffs in this case, a class-action suit by consumers who claim they have been overcharged when they purchase apps, whether they are proper parties to sue under the antitrust laws. the next steps is that they will have an opportunity to try and make their case that there was indeed a monopoly and that there were apps taken by apple that con

. >> reporter: the big change came with the appointment of brett kavanaugh, tilting the supreme court with more conservative judges. >> reversing roe isn't the scary boogeyman that the other side tries to claim. we believe there is willingness on the supreme court to actually hear roe versus wade and hear out whether the decision of abortion should be returned back to the states. >> i think that they're absolutely right, that the substitution of kavanaugh for kennedy is a subsequent one. but i don't think anyone knows how chief justice roberts would vote in a case like this. >> reporter: back in alabama, dena says it's bigger than the courts. it's about the people. >> i will continue to use my voice the best way i can, continue to advocate, continue to speak out and use what i can to fight. >> reporter: for malory hagen, her mission is to help keep abortion available for those who need it. >> as someone who does have a pretty outspoken voice and does have an online presence and did run for office in this state, i think it's my responsibility to continue speaking up until people are he

there is a real sense both on the right and the left with kavanaugh re kavanaugh. stampede of republican run-state ban abortion. the latest example coming from missouri. that state's governor sign add bill banning abortion at eight weeks. the law contains no exception in case of rape or incest. it is the eighth of the state this year to pass abortion law. we are seeing a massive response by pro-choice advocates. today the aclu planned parenthood filed a lawsuit over a.m. alabama abortion ban and punishes doctors up to 99 years in prison for providing abortion services. the aclu is exploring all options to stop the mauissouri w going into effect. last year the same judge declared a 15-week abortion ban to be unconstitutional. t the judge's words. "here we go again, mississippi passed a number of law prior to abortio abortions, most women do not seek abortion services until after six weeks, prevents a woman's free choice which is essential for dignity and autonomy." joining us are our department director of the aclu and destiny lopez. it is so nice to have you with u

up neil gorsuch, and then we fought our way through a highly controversial confirmation of bret kavanaugh, but it is not just changing the supreme court that we did. we also were changing the circuit courts. one step below the supreme court. >> sean: senator, thank you for being with us.

women and men in this country are very worried now with the confirmation of judge kavanaugh.oe is hanging by a very thin thread. the other important thing to remember, this is a country that supports abortion rights overwhelmingly. in fact, support for roe is stronger than it's ever been, and i think that's one of the reasons we see women not only running for office, the vast majority of voters in this country, 20% of americans have marched or taken part in a protest since the trump inauguration. and the main reason has been women's rights. is declared unconstitutional, but i will tell you this is sending a chill across the country and women are noticing and women are organizing. >> and this -- the alabama legislature has a history, as you say, of passing these bills that do get struck down in federal court at great legal expense to the state. in legal fees as they go through this process. and so it's possible that some of these legislators have just gotten comfortable with the idea that they can do this as a stunt and as a way of showing, you know, where they stand on this,

you will see a concerted effort in many cases by lawyers to pick off that vote from brett kavanaugh.important to note this ruling simply allows the lawsuit to move forward before lower court if apple were to lose their antitrust law entitles plaintiff to triple the damages if the court rules against apple. shannon: our midnight hero's next. on the bright side, my book is in your local bookstores or order online. plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology that captured carbon like trees we could help lower emissions. carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. that's why we're working on ways to improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪ i had nomine...ms of hepatitis c. ...caused liver damage. epclusa treats all main types of chronic hep c. whatever your type, ask your doctor if epclusa is your kind of cure. i had the common type. mine was rare. epclusa has a 98% overall cure rate. i just found out about my hepatitis c. i knew for years. epclusa is only one pill, once a day, taken w

wade," has been replaced by brett kavanaugh, who will vote to overturn it. >> stephen: so, this alabama case could overturn "roe v. wade," as long as it doesn't arrive at the supreme court durg beach week. ( laughter ) ( applause ) obviously, then-- obviously, when kavanaugh will refuse himself, which is the legal term for boofing. "dude! dude, you were a monster! dude, you were a monstert party last night. you recused yourself! i would have helped." the bill's proponents are very confident about its chances in the court, especially alabama pro-life coalition president and colonel sanders after he got his stomach stapled, eric johnston. >> stephen: so he's pro-life, unless it's ruth bader ginsburg. quick, justice ginsberg, get pregnant! it's your only chance! ( laughter ) now, now, the lack-- ( applause ) the lack of exceptions in thron the who voted for it,but th sho, according to the bill's sponsor, republican state senator and undertaker's first pass at giving your loved one a smile, clyde chambliss. chambliss explained that the bill doesn't actually outlaw abortion, saying it only a

those in favour of prout life, presumably, they are looking at brett kavanaugh and neil gore such, tost. when both into the senate, as far as they were concerned, roe vs wade was powerful and set in. why would you go back on their word? the alabama law, any lower cult coat would have to strike that down. it essentially bans all abortions, abortions is predicted unless there isa abortions is predicted unless there is a limitation. a total ban is not due burden. for the is a limitation. a total ban is not due burden. forthe court is a limitation. a total ban is not due burden. for the court to take that case, an appeal from a lower court striking down the alabama law, it would have to think, we might wa nt it would have to think, we might want to change without that is about right to an abortion, period. a conservative majority 5—4, supreme court, struck down another prior case in on a 180 degrees turn, disagreeing with what its colleagues 40 years ago said. so there is no constitutional requirement that the supreme court adheres to. some people think they should leave it be unless it i

what happened to her after she said she saw kavanaugh in a gang rape and where are the journalists? her anymore. it's all about publishing and end. greg: up next, story about politics, donuts and sports. what else do you need? what else do you need? hey, who are you? oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me. ♪ do you (low battery sound.) want a charge? yeah (battery charging.) ♪ how ya like that? ♪ how ya like that? ♪ how ya like that? ♪ how ya like that? ♪ how ya like that? ♪ what you think of me now? thank you so much. (battery charging.) ♪ how ya like that? ♪ what you think of me now? ♪ how ya like that? ♪ what you think of me now? i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c

>> like you said, we've got gorsuch and kavanaugh on the court. out of the iran deal, the economy growing at 3.2%, lowest unemployment in 50 years, i think that is a pretty -- >> laura: that is a pretty good thing to protect, that agenda. >> i think it is a good record to run on. the bigger question is what you raised. the only thing the democrats have to run on is attacking the president, who is responsible for all of those good things. they are so focused on attacking, they actually have a secret memorandums of understanding with the various key chairman, the oversight committee, the judiciary committee, the financial services, the ways and means and of course the intel committee with chairman schiff they have these memorandums here's how we're going to coordinate our attacks on the president, because our singular focus is going after the guy who has helped, all the good things that have happened in this country. >> laura: could the president have gone forward with the meeting, and reading some of the republican criticism, you know it is all bus

. >> greg: he took pleasure in the whole kavanaugh stuff.es everything he gets. >> juan: in the kavanaugh stuff, his actions turned out to damage the opponent's of kavanaugh. >> of course. >> juan: his big issue is stormy daniels. in the previous segment, the president said what cover-up? i wouldn't do a cover-up. he was sending money to stormy daniels for a nondisclosure agreement and -- >> dana: but remember, in the a block we talked about that was all about collusion, not about stormy daniels. >> juan: the avenatti stuff was about stormy daniels. >> dana: he also tried to go after nike. >> jessie: don't that. they're big. >> greg: don't do it. >> jessie: i'm by thinking to think that trump and stormy daniels never had an affair. that's how bad it's gotten. now the two lawyers, cohen and avenatti, are both indicted. >> greg: it's true. >> jessie: the people that allegedly had the fair are fine. this is not an indictment of avenatti. this is the indictment of the media. they can't vet avenatti, they can't vet russian collusion, they can't v

. >>> plus, the antitrust lawsuit against apple and the surprise at the supreme court as justice kavanaugh weighs in. >>> deep trouble, the unexpected discovery at the bottom of the ocean. >>> and driven to distraction, the top three annoyances at the office and how many minutes each day do you spend gossiping. a lot to get to. we begin with tragedy in alaska. >> the death toll rose overnight after two sightseeing planes carrying cruise ship passengers collided in midair. they went down in southeastern alaska near ketchikan. the passengers were tourists on a royal princess cruise ship returning from a trip to a national park. >> and now some of those passengers are missing. a desperate search is under way this morning after a popular alaskan sightseeing tour turned deadly. at least four people were killed and two others are missing after two float planes like the one seen here crashed during an excursion for passengers on a princess cruise ship. the popular tour, which is run by taquan air, takes small ououo planes involved in monday's crash seemingly slammed into each other midair. the co

you goe back to the attacks on kavanaugh, at the elevation of smollett. after avilitti. smollett, none of this stuff is working so they have to keep trying new ones. >> and then the speaker of the house of representatives. >> what about nadler, it's the same thing. they invest, they invest hopes in a two titan, pretty much quarterly. it's a new person that they are hoping that they will have the magical combination for the rubics cube. >> i think nadler fainted at a public event, lost consciousness and had to be resuscitated. he had a glass of water and i think he's feeling better. we just want to let the audience know. >> can we talk about the media doing their own self-diagnosis. you're not allowed to make any jokes right now about jerry nadler having an issue but people like joe scarborough are allowed to go on national teaming, people have told him without naming anybody, that the president is pre-de mentia. i remember when we weren't allowed to ask about anybody's health when it came to that but now news anchors are diagnosing people's mental health. >> with nadler

what happened to her after she said she saw kavanaugh in a gang rape and where are the journalists? it's all about publishing and end. greg: up next, story about politics, donuts and sports. what else do you need? hey! alright, let's get going! and you want to make sure to aim it. i'm aiming it. ohhhhhhh! i ordered it for everyone. [laughing] (dad vo) we got the biggest subaru to help bring our family together. i'm just resting my eyes. (dad vo) even though we're generations apart. what a day. i just love those kids. (avo) presenting the all-new three-row subaru ascent. wave to grandma, everybody. (avo) love is now bigger than ever. ♪ ahhhh! ♪ we're here. ♪ ♪ with moderate to severe ulceratiyour plans... crohn's, can change in minutes. your head wants to do one thing... but your gut says not today. if your current treatment isn't working... ask your doctor about entyvio®. entyvio® acts specifically in the gi tract, to prevent an excess of white blood cells from entering and causing damaging inflammation. entyvio® has helped many patients achieve long-term relief and remission. infus

that is a brett kavanaugh. >> what were women in your community, circumference, how are they reactingat they're seen during the hearing. the feeling among liberals, this is going to sort of garner support universally for women behind but had a different effect? >> i was astonished at the number of women whom i know from college, and the princeton alumnus, women who i love and respect, followed somehow not only the process, the failure to acknowledge the accusers had motivation and not credible, the absolutely, people whom i would expect to know better were firmly against justice kavanaugh, and i was determined of course, i have many friends who were then with judge kavanaugh, but i was amazed at the suspension of what one would think of the universal principles, like everyone who is accused have him or her day in court. >> was a party affiliation, of a group of friends and it seems to me that the one step son startled and alarmed by what was happening. once it did have kids seem to be the easiest, they followed along with every bit. it was a very personal thing because all he saw, his