justice kavanaugh and justice thomas. so that's pretty neat and it puts a a feather inner cat. without further ado professor mascott one percenter article on edgar versus bull. >> thank you so much for having me. good morning to everybody. the last time i was here speaking at the constitution day event for cato was in 2018 right in the middle of the confirmation proceeding for justice kavanaugh. and i thinkti the theme of this particular panel is quite significant because it's been important to the court this past term. i think it will be important many years to come. and i think with the advent of justice kavanaugh and now justice barrett and all the other changes including justice breyer's retirement and justice jackson's added to the bench, the kind of opinions we're going to see in these areas will be changing and the court will be more forward lean on accountability and structure. so my co-panelists have been been able to talk about very grand opinions from the term west virginia versus epa and the emergencywe docket cases at the very beginning of the year. my case in comp

that is from justice kavanaugh, she quotes it here and says this is unsettled law. is it? >> she's right to an extent. in fact, the supreme court itself said that at the same time that kavanaugh said it, that it's not yet fully understood where they're able to draw the lines on something like that. but they're talking in the context of disclosures to congress. she even kind of admits that in her opinion, judge canon does. >> much different than this. >> totally different. you can understand that's how executive privilege might play in that a former president has a role under the presidential records act for that purpose of disclosure to congress, maybe the courts, but not internal to the executive branch itself. i don't think justice kavanaugh would say something that extraordinary. >> to the former executive. >> that's right, the former executive can't say to the incumbent, you can't have access to the classified documents we produced. you can't have access to our intelligence reports we produced in my tenure. as i say those words, you can see why that could never be the

teaches not one course on the supreme court justice but two courses were supreme court justices kavanaugh and thomas. that is a feather in her cap. so now the professor will present her article. >> thank you so much for having me. good morning last time i was here speaking at the constitution event was in 2018 in the middle of the confirmation proceeding for justice kavanaugh. and the theme of this panel is quite significant because it's important to the court this past term and will be many years to come and with the justice kavanaugh and justice spirit to the bench all the other changes including justice my one —- justice breyer's retirement and justice evidence to the bench what we will see in these areas will be changing and the court will be more forward meaning. michael panelist has been able to talk about grand opinions west virginia versus epa in the emergency docket cases at the very beginning of the year. my case in comparison is modest. everybody could've easily predicted the way the court would rule i should think cato for even having me here because it is unusual that i sugge

and justice kavanaugh seems very interested. so tell us more about that, how this theory works.k: and the question posed in moore versusarper is whether the legislature has the power to act alone, or it has the power to act only within the confines of how the state constitution gives the legislature power. so that sounds really abstract. let me make it very concrete here. the north carolina supreme court said that when the north carolina legisture drew congressional districts, it violated the state constitution. state constitution guarantees free and equal elections in noh carolina. partisan gerrymandering violated that, the state supreme court said. and now these republican gislators in north carolina who wanted to draw these gerrymandered districts are saying to the u.s. supreme court, the state supreme court doesn't even have the power to use the state constitution to go against the state legislature in federal elections. it's this free-floating body, the state legislature, that can act regardless of other actors in the state of north carolina. geoff: we should say leonard le

depending on what justice kavanaugh and barrett do but i would not bet ont that. the more likely than overturned row they arehi equally likely to overturn. now, moving from the highest profile case of the term to the very first case ofe the term tt first monday in october the court takes up socket versus epa. that rings a bell it's because it was a second versus epa ten years ago. that is how. long some these cases last. this is a property rights, environmental regulation case under the clean water act involving an idaho couple prohibited from building a home on the property because their lot allegedly contains a wetlands that qualify under navigable waters of the clean water act. the standards for what it means- under the clean water act is unclear. again it depends on one justice my fractured supreme court opinion 2006. justice kennedy and waved his hands. they are not for that but did not give much guidance to lower courts. ten years ago the supreme court unanimously agreed they could to bring their a lawsuit to challenge certain administrative compliance order

juan: you mentionedust as brett kavanaugh. wrote about christine blasey ford who had accused him of inappropriate behavior and also anita hill. >> yeah, i wanted to have the center of the book be some reflections on #metoo, was it worked and was it did not work, meaningful investigations and due process. i wanted to think about christine blasey ford as an avatar for the position that people believed her. i was in the room when she testified. i don't think anyone in the room. she was lying. but nevertheless, judge kavanaugh was elevated to the supreme court and went on this spring to be a vote to overturn roe. i think we disturbed both dr. ford -- who took a huge risk -- and i think we disturbed judge kavanaugh by not having any meaningful investigation. what was the point of all of that other than i think to have this kind of public forum that was not a formal legal process and then step over dr. ford and say, oh, well, bygones. and now we are locked into a supreme court probably for decades thatill be disrespectful of women's

neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. dobbs rose from a challenge to a mississippi ban on abortion after 15 weeks, well beyond the -- before the point of viability. and on may 3, 2022, "politico" published a leaked draft opinion indicating the court was about to overrule roe. it did not substantially change from draft to final. justice alito's opinion closely resembles justice scalia's casey dissent in bothity tone and traditionalism. justice -- both its tone and traditionalism. it begins with his summary dismissal ofen argument that -- of an argument that abortion restriction violates a clause. he takes note of an am cuss brief which documented how arguments in favor of late 19th century abortion laws were -- [indiscernible] -- but he declined to give way to this evidence -- weight to this evidence, stating the court has long disfavored arguments based on legislative motives and pointing out that the evidence in this brief consisted only in statements from supporters of the laws, not legislators. then the main event, sub

depending on what justice kavanaugh and barrett to do but i would not bet on that. if they overturn roe i think they are equally likely to overturn bucky. moving from the most -- highest profile case of the term to the very first case of the term. the first monday in october the court takes up -- there was when 10 years ago. that is how long some of these cases last. this is a property rash -- -- property case. the problem is the standard for what -- waters beans under the clean water act is unclear and depends on one justice. -- what waters means under the clean water act is unclear and depends on one justice. they could challenge that before the epa took them to court. for a decade later they still have been going through the court system and it is all stuck on this issue of the definition of water. i won't bore you with the way the epa issued various guidance documents. presumably the court will now take the opportunity to adopt the test from the four justice plurality which would allow wetlands to be regulated only when they themselves have a continuous surface

, one of his other judges and said that kavanaugh said that he can do it.ng to her, he can take the air force one home, park it at mar-a-lago and at least she and kavanaugh said it's an open question. >> it doesn't surprise me because the argument is so stupid that she's got to reach for straws. she's got to grab at whatever there is because there is no actual legal basis for her ruling and even kavanaugh, he said maybe. he didn't say definite and to go from kavanaugh's maybe to, like, actually appointing the special master, remember, the whole point here is to delay, right? so she -- guess who gets to appoint the special master, she does, right? that takes however long she wants to wait or the department of justice can appeal, but if they appeal to the 11th circuit which is controlled by the 11th circuit, and it goes super quick, they can appeal that to the supreme court which as we already know infected by trump judges and they could delay and delay and delay and the whole idea here is not to get him off because they can't because he's guilty, but it's to

, one of his other judges, and said that kavanaugh said he could do it. so apparently -- according to her, he can't take the air force one home, park it at mar-a-lago, and leave she and kavanaugh would be, like it's an open question. >> yeah, it doesn't surprise, me because again argument is so stupid, that she's got a reach for straws, she's gotta grab whatever there is, because there's no actual legal basis for her rulings. but even, cabinet the opinion he cites, he just said, maybe he didn't say definite. so to go from kavanaugh was maybe, to actually appointed a special master. remember, the whole point here is to delay. so guess gets to appoint a special master, she does right? so that takes a lot of time for however she wants to wait. -- but even if the 11th certificate, it goes super quick, they could appeal that to the supreme court, which is again as we already know is infected by trump judges. and they could delay and delay in delay. and the whole idea here is not to get him off, because they can't, because he's guilty, but it's to delay it to t

now, some postheller, some lower court judges, including thenjudge brett kavanaugh of the d.c. circuit, observed that the heller decision had been based on tax history and tradition and he argued the lower courts should follow that same methodology. he was in the minority. most of the lower courts postheller adopted the test that justice breyer proposed in his dissent in heller and had been repudiated by the heller majority. under this approach, judges engage in interest balancing and then they decide for themselves if an infringement on traditional of second amendment rights is acceptable. this should have been called the breyer test but the courts somewhat called it the twopart, twostep test or the twopart test. and there certainly were an important number of lower court judges who really conscientiously applied that test. but many others skewed the rules even further so that the government would always win. for example, many adopted a principle that all the government had to do was introduce some evidence in favor of the law and that would be enough. and the fact that the ch

but in doing so justice kavanaugh put a statement out when the supreme court went along with the lower court saying it's okay since biden has not invoked executive privilege there is none. kavanaugh said, listen, that's an unresolved issue and i think former presidents should have the ability to invoke executive privilege in certain situations. so i think that's what trump is going after. and if they could get some hooked where they could get this up to the supreme court as bob said this is delay, and he can get a lot of delay if he could get in his case headed in that direction. i think that's what he's trying to do. >> but delay until what? until there's a new -- >> well, until another day. until another day to see what happens, see if he gets a break, see if something happens in his favor. it's been his playbook his entire adult life to use the court and then delay as long as he can particularly when he is the defendant or the case is against him. he has -- he's had a lifetime of using this tactic, and it's worked pretty well for him. >> but as i understand as a person i don't think

and she used the argument of justice brett kavanaugh to make this claim in trump's favor. quote, a former president must be able to successfully invoke the presidential communications privilege for communications that occurred during his presidency even if the current president does not support that privilege claim, concluding otherwise would eviscerate the executive privilege for presidential communications. what does this actually mean in terms of how far executive privilege lasts? because if we get clarity in this now for the law, it changes everything going forward. >> well, first off, the kavanaugh opinion came in the context of an intra -- interbranch conflict between the congress through the january 6th committee and the executive branch. to which even if you have a weak view of executive privilege, there might be some argument as to that. what the judge has done here is mistakenly, i think, and i think most analysts would agree, mistakenly imported that into an intrabranch conflict between the current executive and the former executive. indeed, the presidential rec

there was a real risk of harm to justice kavanaugh? >> absolutely, without a doubt.ere in a strategic location wear we were able to stop it before anything happened. >> a madman whoible was targeting me because of my position as a federal judge came to my house. >> reporter: two years ago, the son of a federal judge in new jersey was murdered at her home. congress considered increasing funding to pay for more deputy marshals, but the bill stalled. do you have what you need to protect federal judges? >> i'd be doing a disservice if i said we didn't need anything, but we're doing the best we can with what we have now. >> are you stretched thin? >> we are trying to get academy classes through to bring on more deputy marshals, but we could definitely use more help for sure. >> reporter: the marshal service told cbs news they often see an uptick in online chatter during elections, and the midterms are only two months away. >>> overseas, mikhail gorbachev was laid to rest this weekend in russia. gorbachev lifted the iron curtain, ended the cold war, and transformed global

what's going on here is trump has -- sees the light down at the end of the tunnel where justice kavanaugh in a prior executive privilege fight over a scope of discovery to be done by the january 6th committee, a case of trump versus thompson, kavanaugh issued a separate statement, and he said i'm one who believes that courts cannot prevent former presidents being blocked from using executive privilege just because an incumbent president says he's waiving the privilege, and that's really the issue here. biden has waived any privilege. he says there is none. trump is trying to claim a privilege. this could go all the way to the supreme court, anderson. >> elie, the fact that based upon the new cnn reporting one of the would-be grand jury witnesses the trump team is seeking to block is the white house attorney eric hirschman, who's already again testified before the january 6th committee. why try to block him from testifying before the grand jury? is there stuff maybe he didn't say? >> i think donald trump is trying to limit his testimony and keep him from saying the most damaging things. as

there is a reason brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett are on the supreme court.nd this will be a time i believe when the men and women meet the moment and make lasting change. we are on the front end of major historic change and governance and the ultimate beneficiary will be in the states, the people, and the cost of federalism. our constitutional rebalancing of power. a second reason i believe federalism is an answer to our circumstances is this. there is very little in american government that is effective these days but there is one place where there is working functioning governments. in the states. and among the governors. every single governor knows we can do a better job serving our constituents without dealing with the bureaucracy and micromanagement that comes from the federal government. i don't need to be told i the department of transportation that infrastructure money is available for roads in arizona but it comes with strings attached. it needs to be roads with bike lanes and light rail and electric charging stations. and oh, by the way, don't you

>> jesse: you know, after someone tried to kill kavanaugh she better watch your words.y a word policeman but they have studied death threat against canon, this judge in the special master cas. back off a little bit. >> greg: i think letter a equals b, you said bad things and people died, it's on her. >> jesse: i would never say that but i might. if you listen to what ruth bader ginsburg said, the court that decided roe was an activist court. this court is basically kind of course correcting here. it's strange that the liberals are so angry because those supreme court justices, the three that trump appointed, those were supposed to be crookeds. that is why they have so much rage inside them, he was never supposed to get those appointments. notice the democrats, anytime they disagree, they attack as illegitimate, trump is an illegitimate president, if you disagree with anything you are an illegitimate scientist, illegitimate businessmen, illegitimate doctor. the court is now illegitimate. you can't do that. the democrats all about defending institutions, then the next day

justice kavanaugh is what i would call very curious about intended state legislator. -- justice kavanaugh it's not just about the text in a public meeting, it's all about the burden that is probably court in what undermining confidence in election incontinence and negotiate. remember, they just eerie to keep big hit after the dobbs case came out. so there is a lot of institutional legitimacy riding on the line here in terms of how this case goes. >> all right, rick, thank, you that was really clarifying. appreciate it. >> thank you. >> still to come, after spending half of a century working to overturn roe v. wade, to criminalize abortion make it illegal and unlawful suddenly some republicans can't wait to talk about anything but the latest candidate attempting a political future. next. next one american palestinian journalist shireen alec overcuts was killed in may this, year people across the u.s. and the middle east erupted in grief. serene was a beloved icon, a household name in the arab world. she was a veteran journalist who covered the israeli palestinian conflict on the front line

justice kavanaugh and roberts joined the opinion info but also reiterated heller sort of safe harborist of the rebuttal presumption in favor of certain gun controls justice alito also joined, critique the dissent argument which was a laundry list of all the bad things people do with the guns and said what does this -- stuff about suicide and mass shootings have to do with licensed, trained adults carry firearms? justice barrett in concurrence pointed to, an issue that may become important in thehe future but originalism, how much does a 14th amendment period come into play, and she caution don't put too much weight on restrictions from the late 19th century because iti don't really illuminate the original meaning. thank you. [applause] >> we have a little bit of shorter q&a. i do have the first question for kelly on twitter. from cancun tonelli, former attorney general of the state of virginia. he asks, i appreciate your explaining more detail of innovative pleas such as in symptoms. otherwise prescribers can no longer be convicted under section eight from one for mistake or negligen

is somebody who took a shot as steve scalise and we just had a crazy person try to murder brett kavanaugh out they did not agree with the supreme court decision. that is extremists. we are also mad that matt cartwright and joe biden effectively opened the border and are trying to poison our children. we are mad that nancy pelosi and matt cartwright and joe biden have gotten rich while they were in office. they lecture us when they are going back and forth to washington dc on a private jet. if you are happy with where the country is, you might want to consider voting for my opponent. but if you think northeast pennsylvania deserves a better future, if you think we should stop having open borders, take a look at me. take a look at change. vote for me and the republican majority. and we will fire nancy pelosi. [applause] and with that, i will like to introduce the man who is quarterbacked the efforts of the republicans in congress to fight against the biden, pelosi agenda. he is fighting every day for us. on november 8, we will take the majority in the house of representatives and kevin mcca

>> look, we said kavanaugh would vote to overturn roe. we were called crazy. court would overturn roe, we were called crazy. we said despite what they are saying, republicans would pursue a national abortion ban, and again we were called crazy. so let's be clear about what republicans are doing here, despite what many are saying. they are looking to ban nearly all abortions in every single state. they are trying to stop people in every state from being able to get access to the health care we need. bottom line. just as we were right about kavanaugh, right about the courts, right about republicans pursuing a national ban, folks really need to hear us on this. if republicans get power, they will ban abortions and every single state. >> so, let's talk about what specifically is happening in the state of wisconsin and how inside of abortion rights is really getting women to register to vote across the board. we saw waves in kansas, obviously, as well as upstate new york, alaska. but here, this is from reuters. women about paceman a new registrations of wisconsin b

we also know justice kavanaugh concurring opinion repeatedly insisted the court's decision would return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives in theti state. but, this was never about states rights. really, to my right wing colleagues who want to restrict a woman's fundamental rights, we know that because now they are pushing for a national abortion ban. yesterday, as we have heard senator graham introduced a strict national abortion ban with criminal penalties for doctors who provide critical care. if itif passes, this bill willab preempt the laws and states across the country where abortion is still legal. i'm good thank you. including my own state of nevada. and nevada, our voters approved a ballotot initiative in 1992 enshrine a woman's right to choose in our state laws. what happened to my colleagues claims of respecting the rights of states to make that decision? apparently it was not enough to pack the court was supreme court justices that would vote to deprive women of the rights they have held for 50 years under the guise of states rights. now, when far

attorney-client privilege, white privilege, diplomatic immunity, the kavanaugh hearings.t because he never gave two weeks' notice. double jeopardy. we're prosecuting trump on the espionage act. you're trying to get an american president on a french word. i don't think so. no. no. no. no. america, if you are not so outraginged that you forgot to pick your children up from school every day last week, then you are not paying attention. where is the raid on hunter biden's laptop. oh, right, the laptop is sitting in a five-star hotel getting a massage and eating caviar, from china. if they indict trump, there will be riots in the streets. if they do not indict him, there will still be riots on the street, like january 6,s which was not a riot, but a normal tourist activity. i will not be picking up my kids from school that day. this is another d.c. hoxz and a major distraction from the real story. joe biden gave a speech when it was dark out. that's all for this week, bye, everyone. merrick garland is a space elf. >> thank you so much for that, desi. stay tuned, when we come b

for kavanaugh, they spent $17 million. for barrett, as far as we know so far, they spent $14 million. these came in not from grassroots donations. the checks were as big as $15 million. the checks were as big as $17 million. and if the same person was writing those $15 million and $17 million checks, our count is that it's $60 million or more. if one person has paid $60 million or more to influence who gets on the supreme court and we don't know what business they had before the court, that is an open avenue and prescription for corruption. and right now, right now, after all that money got spent by the judicial crisis network to push all those right wing fed soc justices onto the court, the honest elections project, another fictitious name leg of this dark money critter, is in the supreme court right now pushing the argument developed by john eastman, the big lie argument, that in georgia and other states, the state legislature should be able to throw out the outcome of a federal election and replace the winner of it with

and hurrah leaning about the way that brett kavanaugh was treated. these are people who are saying that racism is a left-wing hoax. and i know, personally, many of these, as we call them, black conservatives, really, really hate my work. i mean, really hate my work. you know, john mcwhirter wrote a book, attacking many of black writers. and that's why, i also don't want to ignore that there is, you know, a growing number of, you know, black folks who are figuring out ways to tell the things that you are building, so that they can benefit, and potentially, be freed, and potentially even, as slaves, literally, who were told and could turn around and become slave holders of enslaved people. we are literally in this moment where we are going into directions. i just want us to call out those black folks, and recognize those black folks, and challenge those black folks, just as we listen to those black folks like ladee and given or moving our full souls. >> ladee hubbard? >> i agree. it's really wild to think about. and it's just, it seems like it's a very

neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett.obbs rose from a challenge to a mississippi ban on abortion after 15 weeks, well beyond the -- before the point of viability. and on may 3, 2022, "politico" published a leaked draft opinion indicating the court was about to overrule roe. it did not substantially change from draft to final. justice alito's opinion closely resembles justice scalia's casey dissent in bothity tone and traditionalism. justice -- both its tone and traditionalism. it begins with his summary dismissal ofen argument that -- of an argument that abortion restriction violates a clause. he takes note of an am cuss brief which documented how arguments in favor of late 19th century abortion laws were -- [indiscernible] -- but he declined to give way to this evidence -- weight to this evidence, stating the court has long disfavored arguments based on legislative motives and pointing out that the evidence in this brief consisted only in statements from supporters of the laws, not legislators. then the main event, subst

we saw a man who was upset about justice kavanaugh's pro-life views or the way he had done his opinionsabortion issue show up and try to assassinate him outside of his home. the president has talked about extremist rhetoric. we have not heard them talk about the specific case. maybe he should make a statement about this on both sides of the political aisle. >> i would say political rhetoric can be dangerous and is dangerous on both sides. >> we have seen evidence of that importantly here and across the country. our panel, stick around to see you next sunday. before we go though a military couple together for nearly 20 years of celebrating a big milestone in the very same day. we will share it with a credit for their continued successes as they serve our country some goodness on the sunday morning who doesn't need that for the story of a military couple with a whole lot to celebrate. meet lieutenant colonel courtney o'brien. and lieutenant colonel michael a broiling. these two marine leaders have been married for 17 years. they've got two children. earlier this month courtney took the he

but a couple of justices including kavanaugh. has indicated some interest in the issue so yes, there is a state of affairs where that issue goes up, and then we are talking a year. but the state itself, and the ability to get to work and to assess the damage and to go forward on a criminal investigation. that really ought to be done if the 11th circuit is responsible, within a few weeks. >> gentlemen, this is really important and complicated stuff. i really appreciate all of you joining us tonight. especially the jacket and tie on a friday night. and let me be clear, you turned it out tonight! bravo to you! >> student i. it will get me in trouble. so i dressed up in an hindu version. >> he used to wear a taco down to his knees. >> well, on this friday night, i absolutely appreciate it. neil kathy all, harry lippman, neil savidge. thank you all very much. when we come back, democrats are running hard after a big week when republicans introduced a national abortion ban and have yet to come up with a plan on inflation. they're here

and the liberal tried to assassinate justice kavanaugh. but biden didn't say a thing about it.ome to think of it. biden didn't say much of anything this summer. because when he wasn't in quarantine he was on vacation. and while biden was out of commission for most of the summer, gavin newsom waltzed into the white house to measure the drapes. look at him. strutting around like a peacock like he just put 20% down and is waiting for the closing. and border crossings at all-time high and so did inflation. biden's approval rating hit an all-time low. it's official. biden became the least popular president in american history. andy carter breathed a sigh of relief. finally, someone worse. but it would get worse for joe. america entered into a recession. but biden didn't really see it that way. >> chatter on wall street and pundits whether we are in a recession. fed chairman powell said -- made it clear he doesn't think the u.s. economy is currently in a recession. >> jesse: the recession denier was at rock bottom. this is what they called the dog days of summer. biden didn't have a

brown jackson, who we know was more qualified than amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh because they are mediocre white people, they're mediocre white people. but what the system of racism allows is white people to actually the scholarship of dr. kennedy or a the genius a judge, kentucky, brown, jackson because they are threatened that this system of racism is somehow going to fall apart just by letting in a few people of color that's the insanity of racism that's the insanity of racism and so what we're fighting for and this is this for anyone who's listening, who doesn't understand, show me a time in history america where black people have wanted do to white people who are white supremacy and what they've done to us. it doesn't exist. if you actually know history. all we've been saying is i want the right to vote without interference. i want the right to walk down a street without getting killed. i wanted to write, be in my bed without getting shot. i want to be in a go somewhere and not get knee to death. that's all we've been saying for for a hundred years. that's i want to write

are you aware of similarly disgusting and more persistent attacks on justice kavanaugh's wife and children and what about similar threats against justice barrett and her children, to say nothing of the fact that we had an assassination attempt on justice kavanaugh's life? we should not have to have an assassination attempt to understand the gravity of these threats. but we have people who were openly publishing the addresses of these justices, in some cases apparently distributing information about their children , where they go to school, resulting in threats and attacks on them. i hope you are being fair. i would ask that you are looking out for how many of those cases are being investigated and prosecuted, and if you have a task force for this conduct, receiving 1000 complaints, 100 investigations resulting in five prosecutions, i would hope you would have a few to look at violations of 18 usc section 1507. >> senator, the prioritization of threats against anyone, particularly those in public service, is vital. i can tell you our attorney general has announced additional resources from

when you hear from the owners sean kavanaugh.ut also celebrate the legacy of queen elizabeth and big questions of what may happen next for the institution. >> it is a constant stream of people coming by dropping off flowers to show they are supporting us and feeling the sense of loss. >> i can't but hope the proportion of love that was for the queen carries on with charles and i think he has every chance to do that. his speech was really great. >> folks in new york city will be watching ahead of funeral event, and then upcoming days. >> estrella has proclaimed king charles iii the new head of state just a short time ago. in sydney australia he joined me now. good to see you. the proclamation has happened. how are australians viewed or the circumstance. bernard circumstance type of crown are we. >> that's right and think it's important for people to put an australian stamp on all of this circumstance. we have the governor general proclaimed king charles iii as australia's head of state. it was incredibly important that they are to

and charged with murder and democratic politician, we saw a man who was upset about justice brett kavanaugh'son issue and trying to assassinate him outside his home. we have not heard the president talked about this case. maybe he should make a statement on this on the both sides of the isle. >> political rhetoric could be dangerous and it is dangerous on both sides. it is tragic. >> before we go, a military couple together for nearly 20 years, celebrating a big milestone on the same day. we'll share it with a credit for their continued successes as they serve our country. next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ (kari) i just switched to verizon business unlimited. it is just right for my little business. (jeni) we switched, too. (kari) unlimited premium data. unlimited hotspot data. my point of sale is on point. (vo) switch to verizon business unlimited today. from the network america relies on. ♪ any way you want it ♪ ♪ that's the way you need it ♪ ♪ any way you want it ♪ ♪ any way ♪ ♪ any way you want it ♪ ♪ that's the way you need it ♪ it's back america. applebee's all you can eat boneless wings. just

they want to attack justice kavanaugh. they called the supreme court illegitimate.they don't rule in their favor. they are the ones that go after republicans like maxine waters telling everyone took a mouth chuckle after all of us in our homes and everything we do. they are also the ones that say they're going to move out of the country if they lose the election. hopefully they'll keep saying that they'll be gone in 2024. it's ridiculous. she has no credibility. we would get totally abused as conservatives we said or did anything like that but we wouldn't. >> sean: pete hegseth, your take? >> this is extortion for purposes of political violence. we saw this in 2020. if trump wins, your cities will burn. we shouldn't take her seriously. she is as you said, the woman who held up the head of what she hoped to be an assassinated president. if you took it seriously you'd say hold on. civil war against people who believe the first amendment is actually important? the second amendment is a real right. i don't know. we shouldn't have unreasonable search and seizure of a for

there was an assassination plot against brett kavanaugh. we were able to stop it.she shouldn't have received any kind of security per the point is what you just said, she said no to others because they happen to be political adversaries and she told me, her office told me, the reason she didn't vote for that effectively was because she wanted to also get protection for health care workers and abortion providers. but i am sorry. you are accepting the security when they are not then? is this same sort of argument. it's a bogus argument. this is a very clear double standard. >> gillian: i'm trying not to chuckle but the person who showed up to harass her at her house even called her out and said you guys don't even send murderers to jail anymore. how you going to send me to jail? >> it's way worse than that because some of his points are like, if i show up to a supreme court justice's house, what happens? in this case you go ahead and make the arrest? it is rather ironic and there's about an hour worth of this video. make some valid points. i would be concerned if i w