:auer, you -- justice kavanaugh: -- what the ahead. justice alito: mr. sauer, yo began by explaining why you believe that immunity from iminal prosecution is essential for the proper functioning of the presidency. but my queiois whether the very robust form of immunity that you're advocatg really necessary in oero achieve that result. so just to take one possible alternative, suppose the rule we that a former president cannot be prosecuted for official acts unless no plausible justification could be imagined for what the president did, taking into account history and legal precedent and the information that was provided to the president at the time when the act was taken. wod that be sufficient? or, if it is insufficient, why would it be insufficient? mr. sauer: that might be a much better rule than what emer the lower courts here. we think it would be insufficient because, again, that long line of cases talking about using the president's motives and trusive sort of consideration of the president's motives as transforming acts to offi

justice kavanaugh: how about president obama's drone strikes? michael: the office of legal unsel looked at it carefully and numb one, the federal murder does to the executive and he wasn't carrying out the strike but the aiding and abetting laws are d and a public authority exception th are built into statutes and applied particularly to the murder statute because it talks about unlawful killingot apply to the drone strike. so this is actually the way the system should function, the department of justice takes criminal law very seriously, it t through the analysi very carefully with established principle also and docum them and explains them and then the president can go forward for instance with it and there's no risk for prosecution for course of activity. >> justice barrett? e barrett: i want to pick up withublic authority defense. oking at the. memo david barrenited in your brie he cites the model penal code and there are a few different definitions but i'll highlight this one. justifying conduct which is required or authorized by the law de

brent kavanaugh.avanaugh was turned into the enemy of the state by the democrat party, by the "washington post," by people bearing false witness and by others. day in and day out kavanaugh. that was the goal to dehumanize him. to destroy him that was the goal in the workings clarence thomas it. it is now the goal against the supreme court unless of course the left controls the court and its independent they worship att they do movies about it.now and did not win the elections. the potential life of the family why were they threatened? among other reasons the democrat party their media mouthpieces said some things about this court and have said things about kavanaugh. this is a disaster. what the democrat party is doing. reaching back to donald trump this is what third world types to do this is what stallman and the other genocidal maniacs have done. try to take people who are out of political power and destroy them so they could never come back. so the voices cannot be heard. smearing the people who b

justice kavanaugh: sot's solicitor genel? michael: yes. justice kavanaugh: like justice gorsuch, i'm not focusthe here and now of this case. i'm very concerned about the future. biggest mistakes was morrison versus olson. i think that was a terrible decision for the presidency and for the country and not because independent counsels buto were president reagan's ministration and president bush's administration a president clinton' administration were really hampered in their view, all counsel structure.pendent and what i'm worried about here t that was -- let's relax article 2 a bit f needs of the moment. i'm worried about the similar kind of situation applied here. that was a prosecutor investigating a president in each of those circumstances and someone picked from the opposite the curre president, usually how it worked, and justice kahleah justice scalia said it must be judged on what it permits to hand not what was perceived in a case. you admit irregularity of the department of justice. he said, and i think this applied to independent

they tried it with thomas and they tried irkt with kavanaugh.le i played with conservative judges to get on the court.t co when it comes to trump trump judgeswe, their artists there ii no rule. that chevron case, that is a big deal and courts nd for it administrative rulings that make no sense. they can revisit the rulings anew. the chevron doctrine was putting a blanket over the economy giving power to unelected bureaucrats. that has been bee changed.rts the roberts court with conservative judges ares arbe beginning to put the court back into the lane it was created f for. >> trey: you mentioned work and to kavanaugh. i would also throw into that -- >> totally! >> trey: let me ask you about kavanaugh. he had a brutal confirmation process. challenged on everything personal and professional. is there some chance -- i know you and i are not psychologist, but is there a chance on what of their votes are designed to improve their critics wrong? in other words, the left does o such a good job of vilifying these men and women that they tried to over p

let me ask you about kavanaugh. he had a brutal confirmation process. barrett was challenged on everything personal and professional. is there some chance knew that you nor i are psychologists or any chance some of their votes are designed to prove their critics wrong? another was the left is such a good job of vilifying these men and women they tried to maybe over prove they are not what they were accused of being or am i just playing amateur psychologist? >> i think the work product answers that question i think they have been constitutionally sound. they all voted to overturn the chevron doctrine. they voted to give elected officials a say about the right of the n-word they've been good and constitutional servants they've made decisions i don't agree with on occasion but they lived up to the billing of being thoughtful, scholarly, constitutional conservatives they will take a path that i won't take sometimes but i like that in a judge for these charges are smart, they are thoughtful the only sin they've ever committed they do not consider themselves

and i refer specifically to brett kavanaugh. people remember dr. ford.mber his horrible confirmation hearing. but let's not forget, after he was confirmed, there were still 83 ethics complaints outstanding against brett kavanaugh, and 10th circuit chief judge tim kovich said he could not rule. he did not exonerate rhett. he dismissed the 83 ethics complaints, saying that as a lower court judge, he had no authority to impose any kind of sanctions or penalties on brett kavanaugh, right? so this idea that the lower court judges can impose the supreme court's ethics reform, i think it's a great idea. does chief justice john roberts think it's a great idea? do the other six conservatives think it's a great idea? because if not, we still have a fundamental problem. so this is a good thought, this is a good kind of test balloon and i think i'm happy to say that it looks like people in power in the democratic party are finally getting the memo that the supreme court is extremist and out-of-control and needs to be brought to heel. but we have a long way to go fro

but it contradicts what some of these conservative justices have argued in the past and here brett kavanaugh said it's almost unthinkable and stated in the hearing that no one is above the law and when neil gorsuch is a president could a president be prosecuted for waterboarding someone and he said no man is above the law. amy coney barrett said nobody is above the law not once, twice but three times and chief justice roberts said that no one is above the law under our system including the president. and that's quite the change of heart and while criticism of the ruling has rightly pointed out the absurd levels of power it gives the president but it puts into focus the excessive power in the hands of that institution, the courts itself. as we worry about america backsliding into authoritarianism under a second donald trump administration, it is important to understand the role the courts have played in other countries that have already started their backslide. in a new york times magazine piece last year, the question was raised of how much power the court should have and she named countries

did you hear brett kavanaugh's speeches he wrote before he became on the supreme court?o president can have complete immunity? he wrote a thesis on it. host: we will see how he rules today. we are just a few minutes away from the supreme court telling us what they decided on this case of immunity. this is one of the final cases. it is supposed to be the last day of the supreme court term. that is what the chief justice told us on friday. benjamin in alabama, independent. good morning. caller: i wanted to know, is there a constitutional provision for equal justice before the law? is it expressly shown in the constitution that we are supposed to equal justice before the law? host: your point? caller: that should apply to trump as well. host: richard and me apple us. democratic -- richard from minneapolis, democratic caller. caller: no one is above the law. i do not believe he should have immunity. i do not believe any women would vote for him the way he disrespects them. he is responsible for january 6. he said let's go down there and fight and they did and it was terrible

neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. they're great people. they're courageous people. we've also achieved what the pro-life movement fought to get for 50 years. they've wanted to get this for 50 years. they've been working so hard, getting abortion out of the federal government. they wanted it out. that means everybody democrats, liberals, republicans, conservatives, they wanted it out, and they wanted to bring it back to the states for 51 years, to be exact. and that's the way everybody, all legal scholars, virtually everybody, they wanted it out of the federal government brought back to the states. and now it's up to the will of the people in each state. it's up to the voters. they're doing it. and some some states will be more conservative in what they vote for, and other states will be more liberal. i mean, ohio, we love ohio, but they voted quite a liberal law. kansas, same thing, very liberal. then you'll have a texas and you'll have other places. but it's now being voted on all over. the people will decide. and that's the way they alwa

one was brett kavanaugh and one was justice roberts. >> vance grew up in middletown, ohio, a small toedium-sized town about an hour north of cincinnati in western ohio. he claims to be descended from hillbilly royalty, that is his term. a distant relative was involved in the hatfield mccoy feud, the famous appellation feud. -- the famous appellation feud -- he grew up in a troubled and broken family. his parents got divorced when he was very young. his mother struggled with drug addiction. he was raised primarily by his grandparents. he spent his summers growing up returning to kentucky, to coal country where meemaw's family roots were. he said he felt like kentucky was his spiritual home even though middletown, ohio was his actual home. his mother struggle with drug addiction has become essential part of his political story. the way republicans have been using the opioid epidemic and tying it to immigration is a good symbol for the various assaults on national sovereignty -- this is how they would put it. the united states has surrendered control of its border and its people to outsi

was written by justice kavanaugh joined by the chief justice and justice kagan. when the georgetown prep guys cannot agree. even more broadly this is an interesting division of the court. what i think it shows the most often think about the court as being a left/right court. there are other ways to think about the court. other was to think about the court more serious, more pregnant tests and sort of the division you are seeing here. the chief justice, and i think justice is not classically with the other three. get to results to make pragmatic sense of. even with this little bit of imperfection. i think some of the justices in the majority are more of the school the bread the team bus off the cliff if that's what it requires us to do. there are pros and cons to those interpretive methodology. my point is simply it is worth understanding there's another way to think about the justices in those terms then you are in simple left/right terms i promise of time for questions i will there's a couple of the cases i'd be happy to talk about where the court shockingly sai

republicans in pushed by the liberal democrat party bob entered rhetoric in the almost attack on justice kavanaugh also a young man who was pushed over the edge by the constant rhetoric against judge brett kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing. there is always calls that they seen what the result is from the democrats maybe have a pause but i don't know what they'll do if there rhetoric which is been about the dangers of trump and is been that from the beginning from a russian spy hoax to the laufer dynamics and convicted criminals to annex essential threat and went to get rid of that they use that because they can talk about the issues, trump on the other hand talks about the issues of immigration, crime, the economy, et cetera. it's going to be an interesting a difficult situation for the democrats but it must be discussed. we seen the show before. sandra: all that you respond to that. >> thank you on january 6 i saw extremely disgusting vile comments about killing nancy pelosi, aoc and i've certainly seen things about killing former secretary of state clinton, bill clinton, joe biden, this

recent ones, however, shows how this trend has been on the rise, from supreme court justice bert kavanaugh the 2020 election was stolen. ever since the former us president donald trump set foot in the political arena in the us, his controversial stances a host of issues like race and religion have stirred up hatred and even violence. a 2020 investigation found that there were 54 criminal cases invoking trump in connection with violent threats, alleged assaults. many of the perpetrators cited trump and his rhetoric for carrying out violent or... were threatening behavior, that has spilled into political violence, and like other time in us history, americans think that political violence is justified. this poll indicates that 36% of republicans and around 34% of democrats believe political violence is justified to advance political goals. another alarming set of stats, a survey conducted in late june from the university of chicago found that there is now... more support for violence against trump. 10% of american adults or 26 million people, compared with violence of in favor of trump, 6.9%,

called police on himself, according to law enforcement, he was arrested near kavanaugh's home but this recent political violence is about more than just so-called lone wolves of course, there's january 6, 2021 when several thousand trump supporters, who had been told the presidential election was stolen, stormed the u.s. capital, trying to prevent the results from being certified at least five people died and approximately 100 40 officers were injured in the most violent attack on the capitol in more than 200 years let's not forget the attempt to kidnap governor whitmer the michigan that was in 20 2011 of 14 men were convicted and sentenced to prison for plotting to kidnap democratic governor gretchen whitmer on top of all this, there have been a slew of mass shootings that you might not think of as political violence. >> but they were in 2018, a shooting at the tree of life synagogue in pittsburgh 11 worshippers killed there the 2019 shooting at a crowded el paso walmart, 23 were murdered and the shooter wrote a disturbing manifesto the authors encourages immigrants to return to their

recent ones, however, shows how this trend has been on the rise from supreme court justice bert kavanaugh to house majority leader steve siales to former speaker of the house, nancy pelosi's husband, paul polosi, all to have happened between 2016 and 2022. one incident, however, has paved the way for political violence to be more acceptable to the american public, and that was violent attack on the us capital referred to as insurrection, which claimed the lives of almost 10 people. this was a direct result of the former us president donald trump's false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. ever since... former us president donald trump set foot in the political arena in the u.s., his controversial stances a host of issues like race and religion have stirred up hatred and even violence. a 2020 investigation found that there were 54 criminal cases invoking trump in connection with violent threats and alleged assaults. many of the perpetrators cited trump and his rhetoric for carrying out violent or threatening. behavior, that has spilled into political violence and like other time in u

lot of attacks on the left senate majority leader chuck schumer calling for attacks on justices kavanaugh courses from the steps of the supreme court a few years ago which was before an attempted assassin went to justice kavanaugh's home. a lot of people attacking in part because the record of the bidebiden administration has beo bad at the court they tried a bunch of pretty or reckless attempts to go after their primary political opponent donald trump they weren't really brought down low on those things. this is a very political thing but i think a lot of americans think this is our one institution that's working and working in a functional healthy way they do not want to see it destroyed just for political. >> you know it's unpopular. >> because of a major propaganda campaign. i think because of an abortion decision that most americans ruin think it was a political and that is why the court is now seen as basically a republican institution a political institution and people have loss of faith as a result the car i will say this if you look a few years ago the makeup of the court was a d

that last exchange is with, of course, trump appointee brett kavanaugh, echoing the new that hir risbout freedom and women's rights against the more trump style justice that kavanaugh and others brought to the court because trump put them there. democrats are uniting as record fundraising numbers, volunteer registration and days. harris gaining where biden was, it's very early to try to draw any reliable indication of where we will end in november. democrats are embracing their new running mate. when you admit concern that the democrats are improving their position with the harris swap, well, you're cutting against what they claimed which they've got this in the bag. vance saying this was a political sucker punch. remember, that complaint only makes sense if you view harris' rise as a tough punch in the face. vance's national prominence come with his extreme ideas, attacks on women and he feeds into a problem for the republican party, especially in the suburbs and with women voters a kind of retro grade weirdness. democrats are seizing on that vulnerability and hitting vance for basi

she gained attention in 2018 for her interrogation of then-supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh. >> i'll repeat the question. can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body? >> i'm not -- i'm not thinking of any right now, senator. >> reporter: harris was part of a crowded democratic field vying for the nomination in 2020 before biden picked her as his running mate. if harris is at the top of the ticket now, there's a long list of potential vp contenders, all of whom have their own presidential ambition including michigan governor gretchen whitmer. if she's chosen it would be the first all-female presidential ticket. california governor gavin newsom, pennsylvania governor josh shapiro, and transportation secretary pete buttigieg are also possible contenders. it's not yet clear if all of president biden's delegates will line up behind harris. polling shows while she measures up stronger than biden against former president trump, she still trails him. and some democrats would prefer an open primary process during the convention. cbs

roles, right, a district attorney, attorney general, senator, somebody who held, you know, a brett kavanaugh to task, somebody who's a fierce prosecutor, somebody who's a fierce champion for not just one community, but all marginalized communities. so she's fought for women. she's fought for children. you know, she's fought against predators. so this is somebody. so when we look at her, we are in awe. seriously. and archive, you asked about it. it is literally an army of her supporters. we're all volunteers. but what we do is we push back against the misogynoir that she faces simply by virtue of being the, you know, being a black woman, being an asian american woman, being a woman in those political spaces. so we push back against those false narratives and remind people who she is. she's authentic. she's fierce. she's fearless. and, you know, she's also a global leader. she's traveled to 100 countries in the last year to increase her standing on the global stage. right. she's bringing people leaders to the round table. she's convening black maternal mortality roundtables, convening roundtab

kavanaugh and john roberts were most often in the majority. they are the median votes. own, writing strong opinions in various areas. and this is a court that definitely on the right side of things -- meaning the conservative side of things in terms of outcomes but is not some sort of extremist or maga or trump-protecting or law-ignoring sort of institution. paul: what kind of decisions are we seeing -- divisions are we seeing among those six conservatives who now dominate the court? >> you can group them into three more centrist or center-right, kavanaugh, roberts and barrett, and then three that are more conservative, alito, thomas and gorsuch. but even there, for example, justice gorsuch often goes against some of those even the moderates in the boss doc case a few terms ago in terms of reading protections for sexual orientationation in imemployment law or indian law cases. thomas dissents alone, he dissents alone african-americans on various kind of cases. and even in kind of sometimes political cases, the case that was decided about the january 6th indictments, tha

it really takes your breath away au lucy kavanaugh. thank you for that difficult reporting. we appreciate it. >> and we'll be right back. >> do you think that our democracy is at risk? >> we have to be very concerned. >> this is a report for the president why do you think he's doing this? >> and can he be talked out? >> when republicans be willing to support this aid package we need a functioning legislative branch. are you willing to let people in the west bank vote? >> why do you think so many republicans have downplayed this? do you think he's guilty? >> the lead with jake tapper next on cnn pam brown and gary. >> and today we're talking about the biggest misconception there is about replacement windows. i'm here with ted cones, the project manager for renewal by anderson to talk talk about it. >> yeah, one of the big things we hear from homeowners is i shouldn't need to replace my windows. they're just not that old. >> but here's the thing homebuilders put in high-end kitchens and bathrooms and oh, and windows. just aren't that good. >> so even if your windows are only s

lucy kavanaugh, hope it gets better soon.nks so much coming up millions of 18 wireless customers impacted by yet another data breach were personal information may have been leaked that's nice a.m. brian, gary. and today we're talking about the biggest misconception there is about replacement windows. i'm here with ted cones, the project manager for renewal by anderson to talk about it. >> yeah. one of the big things we hear from homeowners is i shouldn't need to replace my windows. they're just not that old but here's the thing. homebuilders put in high-end kitchens and bathrooms, and low and windows, just aren't that good. so even if your windows are only seven to 10-years-old, they may still need to be replaced. >> said there's so many window companies out there. what's different about your company? >> well, besides being the full service replacement window division of anderson we're the company people tend to call when they're particular about their home. they don't want just any old window or any olon scholar so your stan

[laughter] you mention the questioning of bretten kavanaugh. my favorite questioning then senator harris questioning was then attorney general jeff sessions got so flummoxed to her use her words the ag said you're making mema nervous. >> to cover the democratic national convention for the freeport journal standard in 1968. that the time today's lesson has been comparedh. with. you have covered many presidential campaign since. where does this campaign the 2024 campaign sit into history for you? >> is the historic campaign by any measure. it's one of the most, as we now know what is the most interesting campaigns. it's historically significant because of the stakes that arehe involved in this election year. we've known that from the very beginning. this is a very, very consequential lesson. is it going to go back to donald trump and all that means for the future of the country? or is it going to try to page? asn, long as it is trump versusa biden this to be a backward looking campaign in one way or another. vice president harris mean the nominat

escuela de leyes de yale y ella trabajÓ con los magistrados conservadores de la corte suprema, brett kavanaugho los consejos de su hijo donald jr. aunque ocho aÑos atrÁs vance describiÓ como un never trumper o jamÁs trump, y en un mensaje a un antiguo compaÑero que no niega, llamÓ al exmandatario el hitler estadounidense. sin embargo, el senador es ahora punta de lanza de un partido totalmente distinto en que los allegados, los republicanos tradicionales, se vieron reemplazados por los maga, incluso sus asesores de familia a los que muchos se refieren como la nueva dinastÍa trump, no son los que estuvieron a su lado en el gobierno pasado. >> nuevo partido de donald trump es ahora un partido totalmente populista, mÁs nacionalista. vamos a ver polÍticas de estados unidos, primero econÓmicamente y el exterior, y ya esto estÁ sellado por las deportaciones masivas, limitar la ayuda a ucrania y solo cree en el aborto en casos excepcionales, el partido republicano ya es partido de extremistas que quieren cambiar nuestro paÍs por generaciones y es por eso que esta elecciÓn en noviembre es tan importan

i don't have time to get into bret kavanaugh's nomination that everyone here presumably understands what happened there and the new documentaries coming up on the portal miscarriage of justice that took place. now donald trump's dragging all over america after 50 years of failure delay with nobody coming close i was able to kill roe v. wade much to the shock of everyone. he and mitch mcconnell packed and stacked in gerrymandered the courts and now this right-wing corporate court carefully designed to destroy for a roe v. wade and confuse right-wing religion with corporate power has been demolishing women's abortions and contraceptive rights civil rights laws voting rights laws civil liberties environmental lab workers rights consumer rights enshrining government power over people wheneverer they conflict and corporate power over government whenever they conflict. the court has been behaving like a partisan actor. few weeks ago in alexander versus south carolina another 6-3 ruling the right thing maturity upheld the redistricting plan that the plaintiff t described as a blatt racial gerry

circuit for brett kavanaugh and chief justice roberts. they have three children. and you will hear and see them tonight. watch along with our coverage of tonight's republican coverage heren span and download our free mobile app c-span now or go online at c-span. david in d.c. caller: i want to say whatever the viewers' political leaning and recognize the flaying grant display of trump propaganda. hours of the same message and many of the same lies repeated. biden was terrible. fear mongering and over significant issues and when you talk about the wealth inequality and greed and produces drug adick homelessness. there has been misleading use of statistics. 11 1/2 immigrants that that is false the total number of immigrants in the country and has been the case for years. there was the use of every day joe speakers that have been people who say they have been harmed by illegal immigration but the connection is pretty tenuous. the gentleman who spoke last night, he used the word suspected illegal immigrant. if it was a wide presented spread problem, you would find spe

but over the years, the chief justice is played a kind of a centrist role at times, brett kavanaugh has, in a few rare instances, but she not only move slightly over to the left in this case, she didn't even a few others that could suggest where she might be going to break in an independent way from her conservative brethren on the right in the future, really interesting, joan, thank you so much. wonderful. exclusive reporting really appreciate it for us now to some of the other headlines we're watching this hour, at least eight people were hospitalized for stab wounds after an attack in the uk hey, in the northern town of south for some of the victims were transported to a children's hospital, suggesting that some of them are actually children. >> there's no word on the victims condition to this 0.17-year-old boy has been arrested in connection with the stabbings. the attack though, is not thought to be terror-related also to high-profile cartel leaders are headed to court e smile el mayo zambada, and joaquin guzman lopez face several charges for allegedly leading the criminal operatio

judicial and intelligence committees with a strong stance and civil rights which she drilled brett kavanaugh hearing. >> can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body? >> i'm not a -- i'm not thinking of any right now, senator. >> juju: in 2019, she too ran for president. >> study think. well, think about this. >> juju: taking aim about donald trump in this campaign ad. >> he is tearing us apart. she'll bring us together. >> juju: on the debate stage, she got tough with joe biden. >> it was hurtful. to hear you talk about the reputations of two united states senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. >> juju: joe biden then tapping her as his running mate in august 2020. harris' debate skills were put to the test against vice president pence. >> joe biden has been very clear, he will not raise taxes on anybody who makes less than $400,000 a year. >> he said he'll repeal the trump tax cuts. >> mr. vice president, i'm speaking. i'm speaking. >> juju: her 2020 victory another first. >> and to t

the house, the concerns about an individual who turned himself in but appeared outside justice kavanaugh'swith a weapon, for lawmakers, what do you think about the security posture right now? do you think it needs to be increased further? >> well, first off, let me speak about the immediate upcoming event in milwaukee, the republican national convention. president trump has said it's going on as planned. i will be there next week. i look forward to speaking on behalf of president trump. i encourage all the delegates and everyone else going to the convention to go there with confidence that it will be, frankly, maybe the safest place in america over the next week. there have been threats on occasion against legislators. there was an attempted mass murder of republican congressmen at a baseball practice a few years ago, steve scalise, congressman from louisiana was gravely injured. the capitol police did a great job in that moment and do a great job trying to protect us not only in the capitol but make sure we're aware of threats. the president is different from 535 legislators. that's why h

then, of course, winning the senate race, and we saw her in the senate as she took down, justice kavanaugh and other confirmation hearings where she really knew how to take the fight to, to someone on the other side. and so she's going to be able to stand up to donald trump. and it's not a coincidence that donald trump doesn't want to debate her and is already trying to wiggle out of that. yeah, we've seen her as a skilled debater here around the bay area. do you have a specific role, congressman, that you might be playing in in these next four months for vice president harris? well, i've of course, been proud to endorse her. i was a surrogate for president biden, and i'm going to offer to do the same for the vice president. i, assume that that will be the case, given that she has really adopted a lot of the structure of the biden campaign. professor jackson, what are the polls indicate right now about vice president harris in the crucial swing states, michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin? where are we with the polls? well, it's very close, but i think we need new polls because everything has

pero antes fue asistente del presidente de la corte suprema, john roberts, y tambiÉn del juez brett kavanaugharias del partido republicano. tenemos mucha informaciÓn sobre estas convenciones, pero como bien decimos, todavÍa falta mucho. falta el dÍa de hoy donde se espera ese discurso del presidente del expresidente donald trump. ahora cabe destacar que todo esto que pasÓ anoche fue tendencia en redes sociales, estaba en tendencia la convenciÓn republicana tambiÉn y muchos de los que participaron y ofrecieron discursos durante la noche, la nieta tambiÉn se lleÓo la noche. >> ayer que dio este discurso tambiÉn que ella veÍa pues a su abuelo como una persona normal, que les hablaba para ver cÓmo les habÍa ido en la escuela, que les daba dulces, sodas, gaseosas y trump se veÍa. lo vimos diferente, con un semblante diferente. >> definitivamente lo humanizÓ. y como tambiÉn vimos el lado mÁs humano de Él, que tiene una historia de resiliencia impresionante y una historia que resuena sobre todo con los votantes de michigan, pennsylvania y tambiÉn wisconsin, que son estados clave en esta contienda. >

pregnancy complications, her concerns got the attention of chief justice john roberts and brett kavanaughy, we'll dismiss the case. but there was there was a complication here because three of the other conservatives, justice clarence thomas, samuel alito, neil gorsuch said, we don't need to dismiss this case. they were still in favor of idaho's ban. they thought that the biden administration' s claims here were meritless so the suddenly the liberal justices who, as you know, have very little leverage on this court, suddenly had some leverage here. and they said we will vote two of them said we will vote to dismiss this case only if you dissolve that january order that let idaho's ban going completely into effect now, there is a little twist here and i know we have a chart about how the justices all finished out. justice ketanji brown, jackson, our newest member of the court. she said, okay, i agree that they should get rid of get rid of this january order that suddenly let idaho enforce its ban across the board. but i don't want to vote too. dismiss this. so in the end, we just have thos

want to thank the six supreme court justices, clarence thomas, samuel alito, john roberts, brad kavanaugh, neil gorsuch, and amy coney barrett for the wisdom and the s courage they showed on this long term. andand very, very contentious issue and getting it back to the states puts the question where it belongs with a vote of the people. and it's ith a all over the country. you having the vote of the people and over time it will all work out. it's working outk out. it' at a rapid rate already. you know that it's going to many, manat it's goy states a on it now and many have already voted. and sometimedyand sometimess ags the vote will be as you like it, sometimes it won'tike. be qe as you like it. but our country can finally our come together. this issue has been killing our countrcouny for 51 years.1 r >> as soons. as i take the oath of office, i will stop the biden-harris administration's weaponize bided version of law enforcement against americans of faith and agains andt, frankly, their political opponents. all right. that donald trump continues to speak. he said at the beginningtrump

she has clerked with justice brett kavanaugh when he served on the appeals court in washington. francisco that has been described as "radically progressive," the way it is run. she left that well-regarded firm after her husband was named as trump's running mate this week. usha vance was a registered democrat until 2014 but has since voted in the 2022 republican primary, which, her husband ran in. when she was asked about the prospect of becoming the second lady last june, usha vance replied "i'm not raring to change anything about our lives right now but i really believe in jd and i really love him. we will just see what happens with our lives." we have eyes on the convention stage right now. usha vance is expected to begin her speech shortly. we do expect, i believe, that her husband, j.d. vance, will be speaking right after her. we will keep an eye on when she actually starts her remarks. i think, i mean, one of the things that about being a very young person at this sort of position is you and i've been a person whose family gets introduced to the country in a way that is the

[laughter] jonathan: you mentioned the questioning of brett kavanaugh. my favorite questioning of senator harris was jeff sessions who got so flummoxed, to use your words, that the ag said, you are making me nervous. [laughter] you covered the democratic national convention for the freeport journal since 1968. that's a time that today's election has been compared with. you've covered many presidential campaigns since. where does this campaign, the 2024 campaign, fit into history for you? >> this is a historic campaign by any measure. it's one of the most interesting campaigns. it is historically significant because of the stakes involved in this election year. we've known that from the very beginning. this is a very consequential election. what direction is america going to take in 2024? is it going to go back to donald trump and all that that means for the future of the country? is it going to turn page? as long as it was trump versus biden, this was not a future oriented campaign. this was going to be a backward looking campaign. vice president harris

there is reason there was a man camped outside of brett kavanaugh's house threatening to kill him. the left refuses to face the music and consequences of its own policies and try to blame individuals on the bench and undermine the legitimacy of the supreme court. this affects future democratic and republican presidents, it is not a partisan ruling. democrats need to be careful who they are attacking and why they are doing so. >> ashley: white house staff is stunned to see hunter joining meetings with the president. any to the soundbite with karine jean-pierre talking to reporters. >> it is a week where there is more family members who will come to the white house, i'm sure i r you will see them on 4th of july. >> the question would be is he participationing in meetings with senior advisors? >> he came back with his dad from camp david, he walked him into the speech prep and he was in the room. anything else coming out of that epiradioing, i can't speak to. >> ashley: this is not small business, help your son out, this is united states of america. and american lives are in jeopardy