brought lawsuit, amanda savage, of public counsel and a student who was a plaintiff in the case, kavika smith. amanda, congratulations on winning first round of the very important and impactful lawsuit and affects hundreds of thousands of students and it may not be over yet. but the ruling handed down by the alameda county superior court judge yesterday sided with your argument on behalf of students with disabilities. what was your argument? >> our argument was quite simple. the argument that uc so-called test optional policy was in fact optional only for students without disability. that is classic discrimination. students with disabilities simply do not have the same access to the tests. they are barred from submitting their scores and not have the same, and students with disabilities can not have accommodations approved and test sites. students whose abilities render them particularly susceptible have to put lives at risk in order to take a test. it's black letter discrimination an and. >> you join this lawsuit because of your own experience with s.a.t. testing who had family trauma. tell