for a| keir starmer does not stand for a great _ keir starmer does not stand for a great deat— keir typical weather— great deal and went he sees typical weather changes, _ great deal and went he sees typical weather changes, he _ great deal and went he sees typical weather changes, he changed - great deal and went he sees typical weather changes, he changed his. weather changes, he changed his opinion, — weather changes, he changed his opinion, too~ _ weather changes, he changed his opinion. toe-— weather changes, he changed his oinion, too. . ~ , . ~ opinion, too. thank you very much. a cuick opinion, too. thank you very much. a quick point — opinion, too. thank you very much. a quick point we — opinion, too. thank you very much. a quick point we will— opinion, too. thank you very much. a quick point we will happily _ opinion, too. thank you very much. a quick point we will happily more - quick point we will happily more on that story and the crucial element just breaking in the last little while. we'll have plenty more on that story, including for viewers in the uk, we'll be hearin

keir starmer wants to leave that all behind.mments about israel, letting hamas attack on october the 7th. in many ways those comments were worse than the comments that did lead to azhar ali's suspension. there is no particular logic in terms of the suspension, they should have acted immediately. it wouldn't have saved labour for the by—election, immediately. it wouldn't have saved labourfor the by—election, that was already done and dusted in terms of the candidates, but nonetheless it would have avoided the charge of indecision that have been labelled at keir starmer now. the question that will be thrown a keir starmer is why he allowed the situation to fester knowing the first comment were causing great damage and defence with some people. {shrew were causing great damage and defence with some people. given the underl in: defence with some people. given the underlying narrative _ defence with some people. given the underlying narrative and _ defence with some people. given the underlying narrative and given - defence with some

. , . your response to keir starmer's seech? ., ., your response to keir starmer's seech?,, . , speech? it was a good speech. he is develoin: speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as _ speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as a _ speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as a speaker. _ speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as a speaker. it - speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as a speaker. it was - speech? it was a good speech. he is developing as a speaker. it was well| developing as a speaker. it was well written. it was strongly argued. there was a strong line in their about how scotland, instead of sending a message to westminster, should be sending a government in westminster. that is playing to? �*s very strong appeal both against the snp and against the conservatives. which is that if you have a labour government in westminster, then scotland will feel very much part of that. and i think that is his answer to the attacks that come against him from the snp in particular. do to the attacks that come against him from the snp

i think he is getting a bad press, keir starmer. i have got a | press, keir starmer.s somebody in north london. and — friend who knows somebody in north london, and she said there is great enthusiasm — london, and she said there is great enthusiasm for keir starmer. i quite like him _ enthusiasm for keir starmer. i quite like him. ., enthusiasm for keir starmer. i quite like him._ morning. i enthusiasm for keir starmer. i quite | like him._ morning. my like him. there we are. morning. my oint like him. there we are. morning. my point was. — like him. there we are. morning. my point was. i— like him. there we are. morning. my point was. i am _ like him. there we are. morning. my point was, i am astounded _ like him. there we are. morning. my point was, i am astounded at - like him. there we are. morning. my point was, i am astounded at the - point was, i am astounded at the british— point was, i am astounded at the british people _ point was, i am astounded at the british people have _ point was, i am astounded at the british people have gone - point was, i am astounde

have you spoken to sir keir starmer about this and this - keir starmer about this and this particularis and this particular issue? about azhar ali, certainly not _ particular issue? about azhar ali, certainly not but _ particular issue? about azhar ali, certainly not but i _ particular issue? about azhar ali, certainly not but i have _ particular issue? about azhar ali, certainly not but i have spoken i particular issue? about azhar ali, i certainly not but i have spoken with all the political leaders and i make them more regularly and all the parties in westminster and there is a general consensus that they are not going to tolerate anti—semitism. i have heard it from sir keir starmer and seen evidence, i have heard it from sir ed davey and rishi sunak, the welsh nationalists and the scottish nationalists and some of the other smaller parties that is a change of approach and that first party resolve to deal with problems in their own parties is vitally important. if that gets broken, that is incredibly dangerous for the country and for the jewish community. country and for the jewish

it's a major u—turn for opposition leader, keir starmer. on the policy in recent weeks has been increasingly muddled, with some seniorfigures refusing to use the £28bn figure in interviews, while others, including sir keir, continued to do so. sources insist the party's green prosperity plan, which includes creating a publicly—owned green power company, is not being dropped altogether. an official announcement is expected later today. the bbcs chief political correspondent henry zeffman explained the context of this u—turn a little earlier. they said they would spend £28 billion a year should they win the general election to help britain on its transition to a net zero economy. that policy has been softened a little in a couple of different technical ways, the key figure 28 billion was still there until we are told today from the labour party will say that while it is still committed to the green reat transition to what they call their green prosperity plan, investing in things like home insulation, clean steel plants, battery technology and

earlier he defended sir keir starmer's decision . u have to remember when these proposals were originally put forward, it was 2021. it was before liz truss had taken her wrecking ball to the british economy and it was before the national debt had reached the unbelievable levels it's now at. obviously what we're not backing down on is the need to have the green transition as an essential part of restoring and rebuilding our economy. what we're seeing is we can't give a commitment to that level of borrowing now because it seems unlikely it will be offered label, you know, i mean, we're talking here about 28 billion. i don't know what how many, how easy it is for people to visualise that sort of figure , but it has to be set figure, but it has to be set against a national debt that's now at 2.6 trillion. >> so there we have it. is it a case of there's no money to do this . yes. they're blaming the this. yes. they're blaming the conservatives for leaving the economy in a poor state of living. it's a bit rich when you think what liam byrne

, it doesn't matter what keir people will starmer, it doesn't matter what keir their people will starmer doesn't matter what keir their own people will starmer, it doesn't matter what keir their own mind)ple will starmer, it doesn't matter what keir their own mind up; will starmer, it doesn't matter what keir their own mind up andl make their own mind up and i think they'll think that think they'll they'll think that keir starmer on him, because what point visit what was the point of the visit otherwise. people will make otherwise. but people will make their but the real their minds up. but the real shame is lindsay hall is shame here is lindsay hall is now a great amount now under a great amount of pressure. somebody pressure. but he was somebody everybody pressure. but he was somebody everpoint . he was a great this point. he was a great speaker and think keir starmer speaker and i think keir starmer may him the may have thrown him to the wolves no doubt wolves, because there's no doubt this worked out for the this has worked out for the labour party, which again makes a the a whole th

that is what keir starmer is doing.rd argument to make and convince people of, i suspect. and then there's the whole thing about what keir starmer stands for and whether he changes his mind rather a lot. and that's been a political attack line from the conservatives for some time. and the basis upon which they can make that argument does include quite a few case studies, a lot of the policies that keir starmer stood for when he was running for the labour leadership, things like getting rid of university tuition fees in england, reforming and rebranding universal credit, the benefits package and various other things. that was then. this is since he's been leader. there's been a whole question around where labour now are on bankers�* bonuses. and so an argument around u—turns is one that his opponents are really going for. and this is another case study of that, whether or not you think it was a wise move or not. so, you've been speaking to the leader of the uk labour party today, but we've both been speaking to the leade

and sir keir starmer , i that. and sir keir starmer, i imagine, will be very happy indeed. if, as i suspect is more likely because the precedent is that usually the government's amendment would be voted on, and if that amendment is selected, that was likely to open up a whole world of trouble for sir keir starmer, because i suspect that then many labour mps would be sorely tempted to vote with the original snp . vote with the original snp. motion. so this could be a very, very difficult afternoon, i think. worth saying too, that although there's all this agonising in parliament and positioning a lot of this, although this is very deeply felt by by many people on all sides of the house, and there is a lot of political game playing going on here because ultimately this is a war that's happening thousands of miles away. and whatever the snp votes for or labour votes for or whatever parliament says they want to happenisnt parliament says they want to happen isn't really going to influence benjamin netanyahu or the leaders of hamas . uh, the the leaders of hamas. uh, the only th

that is why so keir starmer suggested i is why so keir starmer suggested that israel— is why so keir l has a right to defend itself, but how it defends itself| itself, but how it defends itself matters — itself, but how it defends itself matters and _ itself, but how it defends itself matters and it _ itself, but how it defends itself matters and it is _ itself, but how it defends itself matters and it is what - itself, but how it defends itself matters and it is what the - matters and it is what the international— matters and it is what the - international communication. ho international communication. no doubt international communication. doubt there will be lots of talk about that in westminster this week. we about to talk to michael tomlinson, after a shocking defeat for your party in by—elections this week, it is looking pretty catastrophic isn't it? i week, it is looking pretty catastrophic isn't it? week, it is looking pretty catastrohic isn't it? . , ., catastrophic isn't it? i have been a by-election _ catastrophic isn't it? i have been a by-election candidate _ catastrophic

say, we don't want keir starmer~ _ they say, we don't want keir starmer.s-mogg, thank you very much for - by-election. jacob rees-mogg, thank you very much for talking j thank you very much for talking to us. everybody wanted to talk to us. everybody wanted to talk to you, so will let you go. a busy evening here in kingswood, things just starting to wrap up now with the labour party gaining a seat from the conservatives with the majority of just over conservatives with the majority ofjust over 2000. hannah, thank you very much. you may have been kicked out by the time we get back to you, as they are clearing up around you, but thank you for your coverage there this evening. and if you'rejustjoining us, as hannah said, labour have won the kingswood by—election. let me give you a recap of the actual result now, so if you are just actual result now, so if you arejustjoining us... and here come the results. as we said, damien egan for the labour party has won the seat, and we can hopefully bring you those shortly. i can tell you he won with 11,176 votes. that

>> well, there are two reasons why sir keir starmer ought to apologise. was in direct contradiction of erskine may 2130, which states until recent times it was not in order to refer to persons in the galleries, except generally for the purpose of an order for their withdrawal, though it was a matter of judgement for the chair as to whether intervene in 2017, whether to intervene in 2017, the strict rule was the former strict rule was abrogated, the speaker stating that such references could be permitted , but that references permitted, but that references by members in debate should be brief and directly related to proceedings and should not be phrased. this is the key bit says to be in any way intimidating, to to intimidating, or to seek to influence . starmer influence debate. starmer clearly wanted influence the clearly wanted to influence the debate because debate, and second, because he misled the house when he said that brianna ghey mother was in the at the time. she the gallery at the time. she wasn't. she entered the gallery later, but a new proced

keir starmer literally said two da s be... keir starmer literally said two days ago. _ be...wo days ago, the times reader, be... keir starmer literally said - two days ago, the times reader, we will need investment, that's where the 28 billion comes in. there is a trust issue now, isn't there? this is about creating _ trust issue now, isn't there? this is about creating trust _ trust issue now, isn't there? try 3 is about creating trust and building trust with the population across britain, if we want to get people's trust, we need to be honest with them, have to say, look, if the financial situation we would inherit if we won the election this year is going to be a mess because of 1a years of conservative government, because of the tories are crashing the economy, all the damage they will do in maxing out the credit card, asjeremy hunt is now rumoured to be saying, we had to be honest about what we would inherit and that will build trust, by making difficult decisions, saying things like, where we see our fiscal rules come first, we mean it, we're being with a straight with

do you accept the argument that a vote for reform uk is a vote for sir keir starmer ? cialism , starmer and real socialism, rather than the slow socialism of rishi sunak, that the centre right will come to its senses. >> so you could almost sound leninist. the worse the better. perhaps we need to experience the full horrors of real socialism in order to rediscover the virtues of the free market, douglas , thank you for making douglas, thank you for making the time. >> we know you're a busy chap and we'll catch up soon. my thanks there to the co—founder of vote leave live from mississippi in the united states, . states, douglas carswell. listen, quick listen, let's get a quick reaction from nina michkov and mike parry. my friday friends . mike parry. my friday friends. nina, what do you think about nigel farage's dilemma? the conservative party is 190 years old. it is the most successful political party in the history of europe. he'll be tempted to join that, won't he? >> well, what will what will be left for him to join? they are they destroyed themselves. they're implo

the tories have failed and this changed labour party with the leadership of keir starmer stands ready starmer stands ready to change the country._ that is - starmer stands ready to change the country._ that is our - country. cheering. that is our mission. and _ country. cheering. that is our mission. and we _ country. cheering. that is our mission. and we will _ country. cheering. that is our mission. and we will work - country. cheering. that is our| mission. and we will work every country. cheering. that is our- mission. and we will work every day between now and the general election to win the trust of the people to help make it happen. it! to win the trust of the people to help make it happen.— help make it happen. i'd like to start by thanking _ help make it happen. i'd like to start by thanking the _ help make it happen. i'd like to start by thanking the voters - help make it happen. i'd like to start by thanking the voters ofl start by thanking the voters of kingswood are putting their trust in me and _ kingswood are putting their trust in me and for— kingswood are putting thei

do you accept the argument that a vote for reform uk is a vote for sir keir starmer ? alism , starmer and real socialism, rather than the slow socialism of rishi sunak, that the centre right will come to its senses. >> so you could almost sound leninist. the worse the better. perhaps we need to experience the full horrors of real socialism in order to rediscover the virtues of the free market, douglas , thank you for making douglas, thank you for making the time. >> we know you're a busy chap and we'll catch up soon. my thanks there to the co—founder of vote leave live from mississippi in the united states, . states, douglas carswell. listen, quick listen, let's get a quick reaction from nina michkov and mike parry. my friday friends . mike parry. my friday friends. nina, what do you think about nigel farage's dilemma? the conservative party is 190 years old. it is the most successful political party in the history of europe. he'll be tempted to join that, won't he? >> well, what will what will be left for him to join? they are they destroyed themselves. they're implodi

look at keir starmer's _ was only 99% of a u-turn. _ was only 99% of a u-turn. look at keir starmer's face as _ was only 99% of a u-turn. look at keir starmer's face as he - was only 99% of a u-turn. look at l keir starmer's face as he considered his reply. {iii keir starmer's face as he considered his rel . . keir starmer's face as he considered hisrel. ., ., his reply. of all the weeks to say that, his reply. of all the weeks to say that. when _ his reply. of all the weeks to say that, when brianne's _ his reply. of all the weeks to say that, when brianne's mother- that, when brianne's mother is in this chamber. shame. parading as a man of integrity when he has got absolutely no responsibility. the prime minister was asked if he would apologise. he didn't, but admired esther ghey�*s bbc interview at the weekend. t esther ghey's bbc interview at the weekend. ., ., , ., weekend. i thought demonstrated the ve best of weekend. i thought demonstrated the very best of humanity _ weekend. i thought demonstrated the very best of humanity in

it is labour leader stuckey are some -- so keir starmer-— keir starmer.put the debate back into _ keir starmer. it is important to put the debate back into context. i keir starmer. it is important to put the debate back into context. last| the debate back into context. last weekend i was in the munich conference talking to world leaders about the plan to bring an end to the awful situation in gaza where people are dying. i drafted a labour amendment which not only dealt with how we stop fighting now and get aid but also about what the long—term plan is to make sure that we get to a peaceful outcome. iwent plan is to make sure that we get to a peaceful outcome. i went to see that amendments put before palance because i want to make sure that it was a good debate and we had the widest possible options and of course there were discussions with the speaker but all party leaders speak to the speaker but there was actually no threat to the speaker in the course of that. what he wanted to do was to ensure that parliament had the broadest possible debate which is

keir starmer now the question begs, the question that was thrown at keir starmer is why he allowed the comments were causing great damage and great offence amongst some people. given that underlying narrative, given that it's there, it's easy to look back and say, perhaps we should have acted sooner. why do you think he did not? well, i think that labour is quite worried about the the muslim vote more broadly. remember, one in five voters in rochdale are muslim. they were quite worried and they hope that the situation would die down very quickly. they also put faith in azhar ali's apology. and in terms of the selection, initially he appeared a good selection. there was no particular evidence that he would be engaged in any form of antisemitism. he'd worked with other faiths regularly, so he looked a proven quantity. and so i think the party wanted to back him. but it quickly became apparent after those comments were issued that his position was untenable and the leadership waited fatally and allowed the situation to worsen because there was always a risk that more comments would be une

uh, include including, uh, keir starmer. including, uh, sir keir starmer.ying again. he's been cosplaying pm again. he's been at nato conference, sorry, at the nato conference, sorry, the conference the security conference in munich he would the security conference in municidonald he would the security conference in municidonald trump's, would the security conference in municidonald trump's,woul claim rebuff donald trump's, um, claim that he wouldn't protect nato if russia attacked, if they didn't pay russia attacked, if they didn't pay first, let's take a pay up. but first, let's take a look at the weather with marco . look at the weather with marco. a brighter outlook with box sponsors of weather on . gb news. sponsors of weather on. gb news. >> hello, i'm marco petagna . >> hello, i'm marco petagna. here's your latest weather update from the met office. we hold on to unsettled weather across the next few across the uk over the next few days, all seeing some rain at times but staying mild for the times but staying mild for the time being. at least this we

what is keir starmer likely to say?ikely to say that labour is now the party of business and he will govern as a pro—business party, thatis will govern as a pro—business party, that is the emphasis, not so much on specific policies but about the environment in which he believes business can flourish and he will denounce the conservatives inadequate policies as he sees it, for promoting economic growth, and he says with growth will come prosperity. the specific announcement came from rachel reeves this morning when she guaranteed the corporation tax would not rise during the course of a labour government should they be elected. that is no change, effectively. she set out some specific tax rises and it was always implicit that they would not be any further tax rises announced but she made it explicit today, speaking to a business audience, so it will go down well that corporation tax would not go up under a labour government, and we are expecting more from keir starmer in terms of mood music towards business and how much

really briefly, keir starmer has worked hard to - middle east. really briefly, keir. ed hard to purge the party of anti—semitism. how much of a setback do you think this is? like we sa , a setback do you think this is? like we say. we — a setback do you think this is? l age: we say, we expect zero a setback do you think this is? l 12 we say, we expect zero tolerance a setback do you think this is? l «12 we say, we expect zero tolerance on anti—semitism. we have to give credit to keir starmer for the way he has engaged with thejewish community, this is not the labour party that was found to be institutionally anti—semitic under jeremy corbyn. good progress has been made and credit has to be given. been made and credit has to be liven. ~ 1, been made and credit has to be liven. ~ ., ., ., given. we have to leave it there, thank you _ given. we have to leave it there, thank you so _ given. we have to leave it there, thank you so much _ given. we have to leave it there, thank you so much for— given. we have to leave it there, thank you so much for your - given. we have to

i think keir starmer has been taking the i show that it hasn't? i think keir. alls. starmer has been taking the public forfalls. he has supported and promoted a candidate who has expressed the most atrocious racism againstjewish people and he hasn't acted out at some sort of principle, he acted out of really political expediency now. 5ir he acted out of really political expediency now.— he acted out of really political expediency now. he acted out of really political exedien now. . ,, . ., expediency now. sir keir starmer on the other hand, _ expediency now. sir keir starmer on the other hand, adamant _ expediency now. sir keir starmer on the other hand, adamant he - expediency now. sir keir starmer on the other hand, adamant he had - expediency now. sir keir starmer on i the other hand, adamant he had made a bold but necessary call. it is the other hand, adamant he had made a bold but necessary call.— a bold but necessary call. it is a hue a bold but necessary call. it is a huge thing _ a bold but necessary call. it is a huge thing to — a bold but necessary cal

and perhaps that is what keir starmer should have done. mp, it's one rule for, for for, our friends and one rule for the others . others. >> whatever happens now, this has really tarnished keir starmer's leadership. and of course, it will be the people of rochdale who will probably end up suffering with george galloway as their parliamentary representative. >> olivia utley excellent summary as ever. thank you very much. i'm joined now by the conservative mp for south leicestershire , alberto costa. leicestershire, alberto costa. alberto welcome to the show . so alberto welcome to the show. so it never rains, but it pours for sir keir starmer and the quick responses from some concerned senior members. james cleverly , senior members. james cleverly, um, saying basically this isn't about one person, this is about the whole party. who else was at a meeting on october the 31st with ali? richard holden, your party's chairman ? starmer is party's chairman? starmer is a moral vacuum. lord hague storm isha u—turn. so much he goes around in circles.

also tonight, more problems for sir keir starmer.entury on the high street. almost 20 years after she was shot dead in bradford, a man goes on trialfor the murder of pc sharon beshenivsky. a unique insight into the habits of the hunting polar bear. and we talk to this british gymnast about her dizzying, new world record. and coming up on bbc news... football's spring has sprung — european football's back with holders manchester city opening the champions leageu last 16 stage with a trip to copenhagen. good evening. the bbc radio presenter and dj steve wright,

what will keir starmer do ? because as will keir starmer do?es seem as though he has shifted position, perhaps because the facts are changing, perhaps political perhaps because of political expediency. what will he expediency. will he what will he do? will he whip his backbench again ? what's going to happen? do? will he whip his backbench agait's’ what's going to happen? do? will he whip his backbench agait's’ vbig 's going to happen? do? will he whip his backbench agait's’ vbig decision to happen? do? will he whip his backbench agait's’ vbig decision for1appen? do? will he whip his backbench agait's’ vbig decision for him. in? >> it's a big decision for him. uh, mean, personally uh, look, i mean, i personally think back snp uh, look, i mean, i personally think try back snp uh, look, i mean, i personally think try amend snp uh, look, i mean, i personally think try amend if np uh, look, i mean, i personally think try amend if you motion try and amend it if you want the wording want to change the wording slightly, succeed slightly, that doesn't

keir starmer. plan.a's mother is in this chamber , the shame parading this chamber, the shame parading as a man of integrity when he's got absolutely no responsibility , she absolutely , absolutely , she absolutely, absolutely shameful . shameful. >> those are the words of keir starmer, and it's caused quite a lot of debate online. but let's turn to our panel now. henry, this is a line rishi sunak often trots out . but at the start of trots out. but at the start of prime minister's questions, um, sir keir starmer said that brianna ghey, his mother , was brianna ghey, his mother, was sitting up there in the public gallery . why did rishi sunak gallery. why did rishi sunak mess up? >> it was inept . um, the thing >> it was inept. um, the thing is, we're getting too many inept things from rishi sunak. is, we're getting too many inept things from rishi sunak . um, i, things from rishi sunak. um, i, i think he should apologise, possibly even in private to her. um, i think we've got a problem with prime minist

keir starmer acted swiftly in resonse jones? keir starmer acted swiftly in response to — jones?id he would do is to change _ number one thing he said he would do is to change the labour party to root _ is to change the labour party to root out — is to change the labour party to root out anti—semitism. i returned to the _ root out anti—semitism. i returned to the shadow cabinet because i was sure of— to the shadow cabinet because i was sure of his _ to the shadow cabinet because i was sure of his commitment, and he hasn't _ sure of his commitment, and he hasn't let— sure of his commitment, and he hasn't let me down the jewish community down and it is right both of them _ community down and it is right both of them have been suspended. in terms _ of them have been suspended. in terms of— of them have been suspended. in terms of their vetting procedure, my understanding is that this was a private — understanding is that this was a private meeting, that a labour party meeting _ private meeting, that a labour party meeting. and the recording was released — meeting. and the recording

keir starmer absolutely no plan. keir starmer .rianna's mother is in this chamber , the shame parading as chamber, the shame parading as a man of integrity when he's got absolutely no responsibility, he absolutely no responsibility, he absolutely . absolutely. >> okay , that's caused a huge , >> okay, that's caused a huge, huge furore in joining me now to discuss this in our studio is our political editor, chris hope. chris, welcome to the show. always a pleasure. what do you think is happening? can we stop with the basics. so at prime minister's question time for viewers who may not understand, do prime ministers know are? do know what the questions are? do they pre—prepared answers they have pre—prepared answers and know who's even and would they know who's even in the gallery? >> the pm won't know what the other side are going to ask. he they often they can have an idea of mps will ask about, of what tory mps will ask about, because often raising because often tory mps raising issues about constituency issues about their constit

>> what about keir starmer? >> what about keir starmer?he i think he's right to point it out. it's as simple as that. look, he's now times getting into position where he getting into a position where he looks if will be the next looks as if he will be the next prime minister face that. prime minister let's face that. from elections that have from the by elections that have gone we starting talk gone etc. so we starting to talk more statesmanship like and i think that's that's fair. and when he somebody trump when he sees somebody like trump standing and coming up standing out there and coming up with statements, with outlandish statements, which done, then which is what he's done, then yeah, him out. and yeah, he'll call him out. and i think right to do that. think it's right to do that. >> he's a fool for doing >> i think he's a fool for doing that. he's foolish that. i think he's foolish because actually, what trump did, he was no, did, foolish trump, he was no, what did effective. what trump did was effective. and rule by like that and

so does keir starmer. big deal mind. so does keir starmer. big deal.he then spoilt it >> secondly, he then spoilt it at the end with this rather cheap reference . did you know cheap reference. did you know something? what really upset me ? something? what really upset me? >> tell who should apologise? >> a&e i tell you who should apologise ? apologise? >> yeah, starmer should >> yeah, keir starmer should apologise because he will look >> yeah, keir starmer should apo|angle because he will look >> yeah, keir starmer should apo|angle to :ause he will look >> yeah, keir starmer should apo|angle to attack1e will look >> yeah, keir starmer should apo|angle to attack and ll look >> yeah, keir starmer should apo|angle to attack and evenyk any angle to attack and even using the tragedy of a poor family's loss to gain political points. for me, i think it's disgraceful what rishi was doing was verbally listing all the u—turns. and let me tell you , u—turns. and let me tell you, there has been 30 proposed only u—turns, 300? no, there's 30 of males listed, 300. le

keir starmer's position, doesn't it? exactl . ., , keir starmer's position, doesn't it?ly. politically speaking keir starmer will be _ exactly. politically speaking keir starmer will be relieved - exactly. politically speaking keir| starmer will be relieved because exactly. politically speaking keir. starmer will be relieved because he is unlikely to fail a large—scale rebellion because labour mps will have an opportunity to vote on their own motion. and so in the next few hours what we will see is a series of votes on these different motions and these different wordings which we will bring you live and explain each one as they come. so we will see a series of votes before the final vote on the motion as amended or otherwise. the crux of it will be is the house of commons going to use the phrase immediate ceasefire or is it going to use what the government want to talk about witches and humanitarian pause? which is one step along the path towards a ceasefire which it says, the committee argues, there are certain pre—conditions that need to be in place before a ceasefire

do you think that keir starmer actually keir starmer is actually handung keir starmer is actually handling in the right way? quick quickly enough. tell me your thoughts on all of that inflation number is actually likely to go up a little bit in january . january. >> earlier on breakfast, every bloomin election . i hear we're bloomin election. i hear we're going to utilise brownite field sites. why do they never do it ? sites. why do they never do it? >> it's about showing that the government is serious about tackling the challenges that we are seeing in this country. >> growing disagreements between are seeing in this country. >> american isagreements between are seeing in this country. >> american president,1ts between are seeing in this country. >> american president, joe )etween the american president, joe biden, and the israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu , minister, benjamin netanyahu, that any planned operation inside rafah that small city on the border with egypt in the small coastal enclave, would require a credible plan for the civilian . population. we're civilian. populat

this is a row that sir keir starmer could do without. ld do without.— could do without. keir starmer needed a pledge _ could do without. keir starmer needed a pledge to _ could do without. keir starmer needed a pledge to tackle - needed a pledge to tackle anti—semitism and looking at how the past 48 hours had played out, relations with the jewish past 48 hours had played out, relations with thejewish community and the labour party are significantly better but there are really three questions now for sir keir starmer. the first is how deep—rooted are those views that you had in the clip earlier. are they still bear with members who were at that meeting? secondly, white was azhar ali afforded the benefit of the doubt in any way some people on the doubt in any way some people on the left of the labour party would suggest that they have not been given, people have been suspended forfour given, people have been suspended for four they see as being lesser crimes and more quickly. thirdly, i think the bigger kind of political question, why was t

>> who is keir starmer to make ris rif anybodygise'ag starmer >> who is keir starmer to make ris rifke ris rif anybody now is starmer >> who is keir starmer to make risrif anybody now is shouting ho. 110. >> no. >> but should he apologise to brianna her brianna ghey family, to her mother was there? mother who was there? >> i personally , i'd go and >> i me personally, i'd go and see the mother. i would take the time and go and see the mother. but not apologise time and go and see the mother. but he not apologise time and go and see the mother. but he neverpologise time and go and see the mother. but he never saidgise time and go and see the mother. but he never said anything because he never said anything about it. he talked keir about it. he talked to keir starmer starmer's starmer about kiss starmer's actions. make. he actions. he didn't make. he didn't he didn't comment on, on on and, and the very on the family and, and the very horrific situation and the horrific situation is and the reason if you reason why because if you apologise every word apologise for this every word the ut

talking starmer, not keir starmer. >> wi ministerne minister talking starmer, not keir starmer. >> winow in reaction ng prime minister now in reaction to the conversation he had yesterday with keir starmer and he's slippery and he . let me he's slippery and he. let me move on with britain's newsroom when gb news with andrew pierce and bev turner. >> after the break we're >> so after the break we're going talking female going to be to talking a female farming family member, a farmer, kelly. we're going to be talking about those protests across europe british europe and the state of british farming this country. it's farming in this country. it's fascinating. it. fascinating. don't miss it. don't radio. 1121. >> you're with britain's newsroom on gb news with andrew pierce and bev turner now dairy farmer kelly seaton says that she's concerned about whether her family farm survive her family farm will survive and huge pressures that are currently on farmers. >> she's not alone. a recent survey shows a third of dairy farmers are considering quitting this is, as we've seen, protests all ove

you keir starmer you cannot trust keir starmer because to you cannot trust keir starmer bec elected tor bec elected . to you cannot trust keir starmer bec elected . and to you cannot trust keir starmer bec elected . and that's to get elected. and that's important because i often say this i was not a corbyn fan , but this i was not a corbyn fan, but you could at least believe he believed what he was saying. and it's for a leader to it's important for a leader to believe what saying and believe what he's saying and it's keir starmer it's clear that keir starmer absolutely the absolutely doesn't. but the important ironic , me important thing here, ironic, me getting rid of this £28 billion, this politics it this proper politics because it was going to the country was going to sink the country and that is a fact. and what's interesting in labour's emotional heartland has been poorer people. but these these policies are absolutely the metropolitan elite. and um, people down here in london may be to afford them be able to afford them everywhere else. people are a little by them. little bit p

when keir starmer took the leadership _ anti-semitism?ook the leadership of the - anti-semitism? when keir starmer took the leadership of the labour i took the leadership of the labour party he said he would work from day one to fight anti—semitism. under jeremy corbyn�*s leadership the party was seen to have an anti—semitism problem and it was clearly one of those things keir starmer has really pledged to eradicate. i think yesterday in the reaction he was able to get from thejewish labour movement, for example, they were initially willing to see that while these comments have been reprehensible they accepted the party had changed and in the context of the by—election they accepted at the time it was necessary to keep supporting the labour candidate. for the labour party leadership to be able to draw on that support i think was a significant shift that you saw yesterday which would perhaps not have happened underjeremy corbyn�*s leadership, but it is something, the anti—semitism issue, that keir starmer has put a lot of store buy and in

keir starmer being inlk living human being one that i cannokeir starmer being in bed about keir starmerinted to any extremists or giving extremists in bed with or giving into. honest, he's into. if i'm quite honest, he's talking into. if i'm quite honest, he's taliing into. if i'm quite honest, he's talii mean, we really want to >> i mean, we really want to play >> i mean, we really want to play obviously did play that game. he obviously did offer hizb offer legal advice to hizb ut—tahrir, are of ut—tahrir, which are now, of course, he was doing his job of director public prosecutions. director of public prosecutions. >> lawyer. mean, he >> he was a lawyer. i mean, he of he has do job, of course he has to do his job, you know, haven't you know, but you haven't actually poisoned. if you look at people, just let me at people, if you just let me finish, people finish, you look at people calling the us calling for a ceasefire. the us government just government today has just submitted the un submitted a resolution to the un saying we now want the fighting to the french government, to stop t

sir keir starmer mud all over his starmer has got mud all over his hands as much as anyone else in thehe day on this is saying he's changed. >> the labour party, taken swift and action. there and decisive action. there is another the labour another issue brewing the labour party. not got huge party. we've not got a huge amount this, but amount of time for this, but nana gray all right. nana on sue gray all right. >> delicious . >> delicious, delicious. >> delicious, delicious. >> come on. well, didn't boris call her sue or so call her psycho sue gray? or so we that apparently that we heard. that apparently that was nickname for her. yes was his nickname for her. yes because out that because sue gray turns out that she's been bullying people and talking people in such a bad talking to people in such a bad way. been crying. she's way. they've been crying. she's demanded from their demanded stuff from their whatsapps and everything else. yeah. psycho. what's interesting, though, when dominic raab did something very similar, people were like, he's a firm boss, go him on this very sofa. >>

but i also know— under keir starmer. but i also know from _ under keir starmer. from the thousands of conversations i have had during this campaign how desperately people — this campaign how desperately people want to change and a fresh — people want to change and a fresh start for our country. the — fresh start for our country. the people of wellingborough have — the people of wellingborough have spoken for britain. that is a _ have spoken for britain. that is a stunning victory for the labour_ is a stunning victory for the labour party, and must send a message — labour party, and must send a message from northamptonshire to downing street. i ran a positive — to downing street. i ran a positive campaign built on both the locat— positive campaign built on both the local issues that people told — the local issues that people told me _ the local issues that people told me needed addressing here as well_ told me needed addressing here as well as the national desire for change. people here are patriotic, _ for change. people here are patriotic, and hopeful for our co

is the tories are crap and keir starmer is less crap, which is about it.u're using the poster. yes, yes, yes , you're using the yes, yes, you're using the egyptian defence at the moment. you know, the egyptian defence. no, no, you're in denial. uh, yeah. yeah yeah, yeah. >> and i thought, i thought you blame your mummy. >> oh, very good. >> oh, very good. >> i'm here all week. >> i'm here all week. >> are good. boom, boom. >> are good. boom, boom. >> by the way, that joke should be in a museum. it should be. >> it should i read it in the aramaic and it's so much better. look the end the day. of look at the end of the day. of course. he wants to win course. q he wants to win the election. end the day , election. at the end of the day, he knows he's to have to he knows he's going to have to get . he knows that net get u—turns. he knows that net zero is not not popular, particularly people . can't particularly if people. can't afford to do it where his problem, where his pinch point is, is palestine on the gaza strip . he's got lots of muslim strip. he's got

that was the i labour leader said keir starmer.�*s westminster leader, stephen flynn, has called for the commons speaker to go. our chief political correspondent henry zeffman has been speaking to him and asked how he'd come to that conclusion. i was utterly exasperated. yesterday was meant to be about the dire situation in palestine. and the fact that people are suffering collective punishment as a result of the actions of the israeli government. due to a procedural decision, a politically motivated decision, i believe, made by the speaker of the house of commons, following discussions that he had with sir keir starmer, the snp proposal was not able to be voted on, on the day, and we only get a few days allocated a year, and the speaker took the opportunity away from us, and he did so, following discussions with sir keir starmer. there was a huge number of questions, and it put that poses a huge number of questions, and it put the question of his impartiality, as the chair, that we all rely upon on a daily basis, as he could no lo

and that is what keir starmer has said . but he keir starmer has said.time, uh, that he wanted it in inverted commas. now, well, you can't have a permanent solution now that is yet to come i >> -- >> of course, keir starmer would argue that he wants the carnage to end in gaza, something we can all of course agree on. an end. and but how mindful is the leader of the opposition of the muslim vote, which historically has gone to labour? >> oh, i think he will be very mindful of that. and he'll also be very mindful of the enormous pressure coming from his own parliamentary party. um, you know, he's he's on a roll, uh, labouris know, he's he's on a roll, uh, labour is generally expected to win the next election . he win the next election. he doesn't want a situation which the civil war within his party over this. so he's hedging his bets, basically. i mean , he's bets, basically. i mean, he's absolutely hedging his bets. he's talking about a permanent ceasefire. yeah we'll all ceasefire. yes. yeah we'll all sign up to that. but that is very different. uh, fro

and who do you agree with keir starmer's weak with as sir keir starmer's weak leadership . ceasefire crisis, nick on act says it was weak leadership even before the ceasefire crisis . william says not if it . william says not sure if it exposes weak leadership, but it certainly exposed who will be pandenng certainly exposed who will be pandering to he's in number pandering to when he's in number 10. massive problem. exactly that. 10. massive problem. exactly that . i just 10. massive problem. exactly that. i just just say that, didn't i? that whose views have won the day to day, jim says starmer played this very well and has avoided all that. was he being about him tomorrow? if being about him tomorrow? uh, if the tories snp hadn't the tories and the snp hadn't stormed could had the tories and the snp hadn't stvoteed could had the tories and the snp hadn't stvote today. could had the tories and the snp hadn't stvote today. i could had the tories and the snp hadn't stvote today. i supposei had the tories and the snp hadn't stvote today. i suppose there had the tories and the