the review will be led by keith williams.w transport secretary said it was a cover—up of mr grayling's own disastrous failure to run the railways properly. isn't it the truth that we don't need another review to tell us what is wrong with the railway? what more do we need from a real outsider, to tell us what we know already. is that the expertise that we need? also, can he tell us how many days a month keith williams will contribute to the review? my sources tell me one day a month. hardly worth the bother, is it? will he stand here and rule out the premise of network rail, which he seems to keep saying the nationalisation of network rail is the problem? we do not want a repeat of the tory railtrack we had, by privatising the state infrastructure. so will he do that today? this review will look comprehensively at the structure of the industry. it is designed to deliver genuine change. i do not expect the industry to emerge in this review in the same shape that it is today. it is important that we find a structure that works

williams, case closed? not so fast. investigators still had not found enough evidence to prove morrow shot steven, then a lucky break. a crucial clue was about to turn up want once again, keithrison. >> reporter: in september of 2006 doug johnson was walking on the beach thinking about his friend of 30 years, the murdered one-time d.j., steven b. williams. >> and i see this light on the beach, and i thought, now what can that be? i dropped my cell phone, and it had landed face up, and the panel was lighting up, and i walked over to it, and i picked it up, and it was ken clark, detective clark calling to telling me they had arrested. >>. >> reporter: real life is not quite like that. for all the suspicion of steven's friends, the murder case against harvey morrow was rather weak, no evidence sufficient to prove that harvey shot steven and dumped his body in the ocean. >> we were looking for steven's d.n. on the boat knowing that his death was caused by a gunshot wound it was pretty obvious that there should be something that said this is where it was. >> reporter: but there wasn't, no blood, no gun, no significant fingerprints. what they needed couldn't find, was something th

keith morrison. >> reporter: in september of 2006, doug johnson was walking an the beach, thinking about his friend of 30 years, the murdered one-time dj, steven b. williamst on the beach, and i thought, now, what could that be? had i dropped my cell phone? it landed face up, the panel lit up, i walked to it and it it was ken clark calling to say they arrested harvey. it was a sense of relief, undescribable. >> reporter: which is, perhaps, where the movie version of this story would end. real life is not quite like that. for all the suspicion of steven's friends, the murder case against harvey marrow was rather week. no evidence sufficient to prove that harvey shot steven and dumped his body in the ocean. >> we were looking for steven's dna on the boat, knowing that his death was caused by a gunshot wound. it was pretty obvious that there should be something that said, this is where it was. >> reporter: but there wasn't. no blood. no gun. no significant fingerprints. what they needed was something to put them on the far side of catalina island where the current would have caught the body and carry it around to the spot where boaters saw it floating face d