kelly: that's true. >> you know, you point out something interesting. this column appeared in the new york times, written by david brooksmr. brooks often comments on politics, so, very interesting he's also very much a social cementtator. and the fact that it appears in the new york times, which is the bed rock of moral relativism is quite interesting. here is what he's wring about. writing about a study that was done by christian smith, of notre dame and several of his colleagues, and they did the study about the moral life of young adults. and that would be from 18 to 23. and the results are really quite shocking. it real is a comment in a way, although brooks doesn't say so, on the children and grandchildren of people in the 1960's. and which is what all the moral barriers seem to draw. in fact, did drop. well, this is kind of the result of that. so, let me give awe example from brooks' column. he he writes, when asked about wrong or evil, they could generally agree that rape and murder are wrong, but aside from the extreme cases, moral thinking, didn't enter the picture. even when considering things like drunken dri