only jack kemp showed up. all of the pro-life republicans stayed home. what did they get? jane harmon. now, how many times a week to the agree with her? dad used to that 80-20 rule, 80 percent of the time we are on the same page. 20% of the time we are not. i'm supporting my daughter pro-choice. he caught hell, jack kemp caught hell, and she lost. >> host: you do not believe there should be a pro-life litmus test? >> guest: i don't think there should be a pro-choice on the other side. there really should not be. these did you in trouble. add to this a part in the book. i speak at pro life events all over the country. one of the things i ask when i go out is how many of you would have rather been a note -- aborted? so far 100% of the answers are, no, i'm very happy being alive. 69 percent of abortions again on young girls who profess to believe in god. catholic or protestant, 69 percent. that is a huge percentage. so then the question is, why? in my argument that i make in the book, they are more fearful of mom and dad than they are of the abortionists. you ever get yoursel

harper kemp books in two of his career-high 33 points to put cal back on top.mo mo jones wouldn't let the cavs lose. he sends the game to triple overtime. cal up 103-102 when jones strikes again finishing a transition, to put arizona back up one, 27 points for momo jones. they had a chance to force a fourth overtime but misses the jumper and wins it, in a game with 17 lead changes, first place arizona survives to win 107-105. >>> randy bennett and the gaels have reached 20 wins for the fourth straight season, first half mickey mcconnell lobs it up to rob jones for the alley- oop. 15 points for jones, 10 assists for mcconnell. they led lmu by 10 at the break. matthew develop a va dove a and mcconnell play a little hot potato before he lets it fly. he leads the gaels with 23 points as they win 79-70. >>> with a battle for second place at the hill top santa clara's kevin foster leads the wcc in scoring. tonight wasn't his night though. he goes 4 for 17 over all. they lead by as many as 16 in the second half. rashad green leads the way with 18 points, the dons win

only jack kemp showed up to help my sister, maureen, run for the congress of the united states. all of the pro-life republicans stayed home, stayed home. so what did they get? jane harman. now, how many times do they agree with jane? and dad used that 80/20 cool 80% of the time, you know, maureen and i are on the same page. 20% of the time we are not. i'm supporting my daughter, pro-choice. he caught hell for it, jack kemp caught hell for it and maureen lost. >> host: suit to be cleared you do not believe there should be a pro-life litmus test. >> guest: and i don't believe there should be a pro-choice litmus test on the other side of it. they're really shouldn't be. these litmus tests it you in trouble. iter this apart in the book. i speak at pro-life even swallow for the country for. i'm adopted and one of the questions i asked in the audience is how many of you adopted would have rather been aborted. so far 100% of the answers are no, i'm very happy being alive, think you very much. but the reality is 69% of abortions are done on young gurgles who profess to believe in god. c

only jack kempe showed up to help my sister maureen wren for the congress of the united states. all the pro-life republicans stayed home, stayed home. so what did they get? jane harmon. now how many times do they agree with jane and dads use the 80/20 rule, 80% of the time. maureen and i are in the same page. 20% of the time we are not. i'm supporting my daughter, pro-choice. he caught hell for it. jack kempe caught hell for it and maureen lost. >> host: to be clear you do not believe there should be a pro-life litmus test for republican candidates? >> guest: i don't think there should be a pro-choice litmus test on the other side of it. there shouldn't be these litmus tests get you in trouble. i really tear this apart in the book and give -- i speak of pro-life events all over the country. i am adopted in one of the questions i ask when i go out is how many adoptees are in agreement how many would rather have been aborted? so far 100% of the answers are no i am very happy being alive thank you very much but the reality of it is 69% of abortions are done on young girls who are t

the pro-life group couldn't understand how could you do that come only jack kemp showed up to help my sister maureen run for the united states. all of the pro-life republicans stayed home, stayed home. so what do they get? jane harman. now how many times do they agree with jane? and dad used that 80/20 rule. 80% of the time, you know, maureen and i are in the same page, 20% of the time we are not. i'm supporting my daughter, pro-choice. he caught hell for it, jack kemp caught hell for it and maureen loss. >> host: to be clear you do not believe there should be a pro-life litmus test for republican candidates. >> guest: a bye don't believe there should be a pro-life litmus test on the other side. there shouldn't be. the litmus tests did you in trouble. i really care to support the book and give others -- i speak at pro-life defense all over the country. on an adopted. one of the questions i get asked is how many of you would have rather been aborted? so far 100% of the answers or no, i'm very happy being alive. thank you. but the reality is 69% of abortions are done on young girls who

revenues that would allow us to get the books right and fund what pat buchanan has called jaishgs kemp's big rock candy mountain? mr. tyrrell does not address this and other questions with depth. >> i'm sorry. i'll try to do better in t in t next book. >> in the conservative crackup, are there remedies in that book. >> that book points out that there's fissures in the american movement without doubt because conservatism has brought in the neocons and it's brought in the christian right and now the tea party movement. it brought in the reagan -- so there will be fissures but i said interestingly that when it comes time to vote, all these fissures are as nothing. when placed against the menace of liberalism. and generally the conservatives have hung together. and i never quite understood this, when they opposed george h.w. bush, who i knew him. i was in the white house with him. i tried to tell him that tax increases were the wrong way to go, but he did it anyway -- that's the one time that the conservatives stayed home or supported ross perot and they gave bill clinton with, i think, 41%

increasing revenues that would allow us to get the books right and fund what pat buchanan has called jack kemp's big rock candy mountain? mr. tyrrell does not address this and other questions with depth. >> guest: i'm sorry. i'll try to do better in the next book. >> host: well, when it comes to the conservative crack-up, are there remedies in that book? be i think that's -- >> guest: well, that book pointed out that there are fissures in the conservative movement, without doubt. because conservativism is brought -- has brought in the neo-cons, it's brought in the christian right, it's brought in now the tea party movement, it brought in the reagan -- so there will be fissures. but i said, interestingly, that when it comes time to vote, all these fissures are as nothing when placed against the menace of liberalism. and generally, the conservatives have hung together. when they did not -- and i never quite understood this -- when they opposed george h.w. bush who i knew him and was in the white house with him, i tried to tell him that tax increases were the wrong way to go, but he did it anyway.

change the focus of politics in america from their ground to our ground, new york representative jack kemp. shifted from the defense to the offense. carter shifts to the right starting in december of 1978. he announces that inflation and deficit reduction rather than unemployment would be his top domestic concern and the administration calls for sizable increases in defense spending and more aggressive posture toward the soviet union. carter also had trouble dealing with congress at the personal level. he didn't like the give and take of legislative politics. the president congressional staff didn't help the situation. frank more, congressional liaison had limited experience on capitol hill and constantly made embarrassing blunders. one member was not told the president would be appearing in their district until they learned about it on the radio. and was quite infuriated with the administration for having this happen. at one breakfast hosted by the president, will lead sweet rolls were served instead of a full breakfast. a symbol of carter that he was toting down the office. speaker tip o

kempe could i ask -- >> is never going to get a chance. >> i ask that all members questions be submitted in writing and the chairman respond. >> thank you for visiting with us. it's my privilege to be with you on the you on the half of my southern indiana constituents. as you know japan recent had its credit rating downgraded in light of its fiscal situation. part of the justification for standard and poor's downgrade was the fact that japan has no coherent plan to deal with is unsustainable fiscal situation. here in this country like japan we have very low interest rates, as compared to recent history. our own deficits are adding to our national debt at a remarkable rate. and we, too, have no coherent plan to deal with this. at least in the long term. you have indicated there is no magic number. i think that's fair. i think history proves it out. there is no magic debt to gdp never. that said, you know doubt have some sense of when we're getting close to unsustainable debt dynamics. when are we getting close to ask and what are the main indicators that we need to monitor? we as members

i spent too many hours with jack kemp. >> to get a word in edgewise? >> eventually. i was a great believer in the tax law and it was vital for us to remember that the private sector benefited. these are not projects on your local highway. it was, i thought, a very important piece of legislation. the president, what he did, one of the secrets to his success was that the democratic caucus looked different in those days there were a significant number of boll weevil democrats, guys like phil gramm. he had been elected the same year i was in 1978 and came to town and believed in a lot of the principles that president reagan believed in. he signed on and join us and we had a number of democrats who worked with us and help us pass that legislation. for the first couple of years of that first term, we actually had a situation where republicans were in the minority in the house and our conservative friends put together a majority on economic issues. it was enormously successful. it was a big tribute to ronald reagan. democrats overreacted and penalize some of the guys on the

chairman, kemp, ranking member levin and members of the committee, it's a pleasure to be you before to talk about the president's budget. the president's budget presents a comprehensive strategy to strengthen economic growth and expand exports with investments in education, innovation, and the nation's infrastructure. alongside these investments the budget presents a detailed, multiyear plan to cut spending and reduce deficits. our deficits are too high. they are unsustainable and left unaddressed, these deficits will hurt economic growth and make us weaker as a nation. we have to restore fiscal responsibility and go back to living within our means. the president's budget cuts the deficit he inherited in half as a share of the economy by the end of his first term. these cuts are phased over time so that we protect the recovery. in order to make it possible for us to invest in future growth and to restore fiscal sustainability, the president proposes to reduce nonsecurity discretionary spending to its lowest level as a share of the economy since dwight eisenhower was president. to achie

i spent too many hours with jack kemp. >> did you get a word in edgewise? >> eventually. [laughter] i was a great believer in the tax dollars -- the tax bill. the private-sector creates jobs and wealth and opportunity in the united states. and it's not vote projects on the local highway or whatever it may be -- and it's not the local projects on the highway or whatever it may be. it was a very important piece of legislation. one of the secrets to the president's success was that the democratic caucus looks different in those days, too. there were a significant number of what we called boll weevil democrats. and the of guys like phil gramm from texas. he had been elected as a democrat to the congress the same year i was a, 1978. but he believed in a lot of the fundamental present -- principles that president reagan believe in. he joined on and we had a number of bold weevil democrats, conservative democrats who worked with dozens to pass that legislation -- to work with us to pass that legislation. in the first couple of years we actually had a situation that even though t

three position in the house and with other republicans such as trent lott, newt gingrich and jack kemp formed a very, very good and coherent minority. he then answered the call again from another republican president, the first president ford to be secretary of defense. he was chosen because it was thought that he could manage the change from the cold war to a peace time -- to a peace time defense department. well, little did we know that the first gulf war would intervene so he managed the first gulf war very, very well and saw -- oversaw the expulsion of saddam hussein from kuwait. and for that received a presidential medal of freedom, something he richly deserved. and then finally he answered the call of his country one more time whether he was asked to run with president bush, the second president bush to be vice president and once again being a true patriot, he accepted. now, there are many, many accomplishments that we can cite from his time as vice president but here's one i want to throw out there and i hope you agree with me. because of his steadfast devotion to freedom and to

kempe, have you seen the steady? >> i read this are the last night around midnight on the w web. >> mr. tarullo, have you seen a steady? >> i did read it, yes. >> can you tell us how effective regulation of the derivatives market can actually save jobs? let me start with mr. gensler. >> i think that at the core we lost over 7 million jobs in this country, the financial system and predatory systems failed to detect. and swaps are part of that so i think is his jobs were just making the whole system safer for america. and it helps end users have more transparency and lower costs, competition in the market place. as long as we handle i think congressional tent on the march and many of the other end user issues which want to work with you on transparency promotes economic activity. transparency competition in markets. .. >> it enables companies to raise the money necessary to create jobs, but by the same toik token when companies have confidence in the regulatory regime, they have a level of comfort in investing, so i th

i spent too many hours with jack kemp. [laughter] i was a great believer in the tax policy. i still believe today it was vital for us to remember that the private sector is what creates wealth, jobs, and opportunity in the united states. it is the strength of our private economy. it was a very important piece of legislation. one of the secrets to his success was that the democratic caucus looked different in those days. there were boll weevil democrats like phil gramm from texas. he had been elected as a democrat to the congress the same year i was, 1978. he came to town, but he believed in a lot of the same fundamental principles that president reagan believe in. he signed on and join us. we had a number of democrats, conservative democrats, who worked with us. the help us pass the legislation. for the first couple of years of that first term, we had a situation where even though republicans were in the minority in the house, with our conservative democratic friends on the other side of the all, we put together a majority on economic issues and so forth. it was enormously s

kempe could i ask -- >> is never going to get a chance. >> i ask that all members questions be submitted in writing and the chairman respond. >> thank you for visiting with us. it's my privilege to be with you on the you on the half of my southern indiana constituents. as you know japan recent had its credit rating downgraded in light of its fiscal situation. part of the justification for standard and poor's downgrade was the fact that japan has no coherent plan to deal with is unsustainable fiscal situation. here in this country like japan we have very low interest rates, as compared to recent history. our own deficits are adding to our national debt at a remarkable rate. and we, too, have no coherent plan to deal with this. at least in the long term. you have indicated there is no magic number. i think that's fair. i think history proves it out. there is no magic debt to gdp never. that said, you know doubt have some sense of when we're getting close to unsustainable debt dynamics. when are we getting close to ask and what are the main indicators that we need to monitor? we as members