and the end, we felt that if we could find somebody of the judgment and stature of ken feinberg who couldlook across these companies, look at what, looking at a set of principles on a risk and performance wabasso what is likely to lead taxpayers to get return on their dollar, that at that extra level of protection for the taxpayer was necessary and important there in the way it would not be as simply a community bank in your district chose to participate in the capitol purchase program, partly because their government thinks it is a good thing for them to have stronger capital and be in a stronger position to lend. >> well, i think every bun understand if you take taxpayer money you are subject to a higher form of oversight and accountability, but the question basically that i am hearing from my constituents is what was the standard? it would be helpful if it-- if it was more clear. is it 40, 50, 60, 80% of taxpayer dollars? if it was one that we could understand it connected to that question what would trigger the eighth company to come into the fold? i certainly don't think it will be t