i think ken parkinson only, only get with his role as a lawyer. he was found not guilty at the trial, all right? he was found not guilty at the trial. so the one person who was solely involved as a lawyer was found not guilty. mardian's defense was hifs solely voched as a lawyer and i should not be convicted. obviously the jury did not believe that in coming back with a guilty verdict. >> if i could make one follow-up comment. after watergate the aba decided to revisit the model code of professional conduct and they formed the commission, and their first draft of 1.6, while it did broaden confidentiality, it also contained new exceptions about when a lawyer could reveal confidences in order to prevent death or substantial bodily harm, and then also additional crimes or fraud that could harm financial interests. and that was rejected by the aba house of delegates. so while the initial draft did broaden, it did then include these important exceptions, but that was not ultimately adopted by the house of delegates. there were two more subsequent attem