nick: and finally, as i asked ken roth, what do you believe the impact would be? it be if the court imposes provisional measures on israel? whether that is about aid or about the conduct of the war itself. yuval: i think the case as presented by south africa does not have a chance to prevail on the merits, but they may cross the threshold of plausibility, which is sufficient for the court to issue provisional measures. and this is of course something that the government of israel is concerned about, and should be concerned about. and we will have to see what sort of provisional measures the court can issued. in a previous genocide case involving myanmar, the court issued relatively generic remedies, calling on the state not to commit a genocide and to preserve evidence regarding genocide. however, in the russia/ukraine case, the court ordered russia to stop the war. that is something which of course has not happened as of yet. so we have to see what sort of remedies, what sort of measures would be dictated. nick: yuval shany, thank you very much. yuval: thank you