>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

they know that it is the issue of being independent and giving their best judgment so i would be kenched with all due reexpect commissioner meiberger, this isn't a thing where there is comp scission, they sets up a different parameter. the other thing i would like to mention if you have a panel of fiver, that is prudent. if you will change the panel, don't have 6. you either have 5 or 7. don't have a even number. it is obvious in the way of doing business with these things you have odd numbers and that is the way it works the best. i would suggest that you go forward with what is already in place that you don't delay the issue. we haven't changed our stand on hedge fund but that isn't what is up here, we are talking about the cio report and this pant, we are here to support what staff is doing. you are getting your people, you are getting the way they should be gotten, which is bad grammar, sorry. all these kids i taught english to are crijing. go forward with what you have and not schedule this for further discussion. this is the way the city does business and all the entities have done

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

they know that it is the issue of being independent and giving their best judgment so i would be kenchedpect commissioner meiberger, this isn't a thing where there is comp scission, they sets up a different parameter. the other thing i would like to mention if you have a panel of fiver, that is prudent. if you will change the panel, don't have 6. you either have 5 or 7. don't have a even number. it is obvious in the way of doing business with these things you have odd numbers and that is the way it works the best. i would suggest that you go forward with what is already in place that you don't delay the issue. we haven't changed our stand on hedge fund but that isn't what is up here, we are talking about the cio report and this pant, we are here to support what staff is doing. you are getting your people, you are getting the way they should be gotten, which is bad grammar, sorry. all these kids i taught english to are crijing. go forward with what you have and not schedule this for further discussion. this is the way the city does business and all the entities have done business over tim

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

>> [inaudible] measure expressed-at the root was kench that the san francisco clean power sf program would rely on unbundled renewable energy credits and not have much of a economic incentive to develop and build projects, right? so, that was sort of at the root of their concern about the program. the board sponsored measure expressed concern about too heavy reliance on non renewable power on pg & e's sides oof the house and would require the department of environment to notify customers of the content of the power that pg & e was supplying and making mention of the nuclear conitant. i understand that emphasis on disclose thg nuclear content was what was troubleicing. what the modifications did that brought all the parties together is eliminate the nuclear description requirements in the supervisors measure, requires the program that we implement at launch to rely on-to not rely on unbundled renewable energy credits to a degree greater than allowed by state law. it met the ibew interest with the positive statement and by dropping the requirements to disclose the nuclear content in pg

they know that it is the issue of being independent and giving their best judgment so i would be kenched with all due reexpect commissioner meiberger, this isn't a thing where there is comp scission, they sets up a different parameter. the other thing i would like to mention if you have a panel of fiver, that is prudent. if you will change the panel, don't have 6. you either have 5 or 7. don't have a even number. it is obvious in the way of doing business with these things you have odd numbers and that is the way it works the best. i would suggest that you go forward with what is already in place that you don't delay the issue. we haven't changed our stand on hedge fund but that isn't what is up here, we are talking about the cio report and this pant, we are here to support what staff is doing. you are getting your people, you are getting the way they should be gotten, which is bad grammar, sorry. all these kids i taught english to are crijing. go forward with what you have and not schedule this for further discussion. this is the way the city does business and all the entities have done