attorney kendall coffey and lizz brown, attorney and columnist for "st. louis american." you both for being here. >> thanks, reverend. >> thank you. >> kendall, what questions do you have tonight about officer wilson's account? >> well, i think his account is something that if a grand jury hears it, and they're not getting any leadership, any explanation from the prosecutors, they might think it makes him look less like he committed a crime because there was a physical confrontation inside the car. but if there were prosecution leadership, this could support a theory of the prosecution that theres a physical encounter, the officer was angry, and that the shooting victim, from the standpoint of the family of michael brown, was trying to leave, trying to surrender, and he shot him because he was still acting out of an anger that was precipitated by the confrontation. that was support a prosecution theory of a crime, if the prosecution were presenting such a theory to the grand jury. but we see no indication that that's what the prosecution, the local prosecution, is trying

attorney kendall coffey and joy reed. thank you both for being here. kendall, i want to get to the implications of a juror saying there's not enough evidence in this case in a moment. but first, what could a potential leak in the grand jury really mean? >> well, it means, first of all, that somebody's acting illeg illegally, if it's happening, and that is the kind of thing, if investigated, is going to add more delay. mouch longer is an investigate like this going to take, and nskt, an investigation of the investigation. and if you have to remove the grand juror, a conflict about whether you replace the grand juror even though all the evidence has been presented. it is time for the feds to step in, look at this grand jury, that was never heading to prosecution to begin with, and make their own decisions about whether there's enough evidence to bring federal charges. >> let me push you on this investigation of the grand jury potential leak. how are they investigating it? how do you investigate something like that? >> the first thing a judge would typical