. >> your reaction, kenji. >> i see it's a 6-3 decision. i will try to answer the question of how it's different from the masterpiece cake shop case, which was in 2018. really importantly this is a free speech case rather than a free exercise case. one thing that we do already know is when you talk to free exercise to free speech, the exemptions can potentially be much broader. two ways in which free speech exemptions differ, they can be asserted against anyone. prior limitations in the free exercise cases that say you can't use religious reasons to discriminate against racial minorities. that restriction would potentially not pertain a free speech context. one of the things we celebrate about the free speech jurisprudence is we protect even the speech we hate. so a web designer could say i'm not going to make a website for an interracial couple, and that could potentially be okay. >> i wonder about other goods and services and the use of free speech to put a sign on the door saying i don't want to serve somebody. melissa, let me bring you

. >> reporter: but across the country at another old workshop artisan kenji amata says tatami must transcend the preservation puzzle? making tatami an artform in its own right. thanks to clever positioning and use of light, the 200 jigsaw pieces of this dragon appear to be different colors. like textiles at that time mi have a textured surface he says. "by varying the angle of the weave i can change how the pieces reflect light, creating the illusion of white, green, silver or gold." there are signs of a quiet tatami resurgence. while families like the moris have embraced carpets and hardwood floors, they've set aside one room forinko -yead trw female: my husband worked on a strip job for a number of years, got black lung. a little over three years ago he quickly started declining and started asking for my help. since jerry got sick and i've taken on the extra work here it's been wonderful to know that i can still hear the word with a message and have some pastor that i feel connected to in my home with me. ♪♪♪ >>> a non-profit group in new york city is introducing migrant children to the wo

and with me here, kenji oshino. justice warren wrote the unanimous opinion in brown versus board of education. van, i just want to start with you. obviously an historic day. what is your reaction to the ruling? >> look, i was born in 1968. this was the year they killed dr. king, and the year they killed bobby kennedy. apparently -- i'm the first person in my family that was born with all my rights. i'm the first person in my family that was born with a right to vote. apparently one generation is enough. after 400 years of brutality, of lynching, of discrimination, of overt discrimination, one generation of trying to at least get the kids together on the campuses is enough. it's too much for the supreme court. the supreme court seems like it's living on a different planet from the communities that i work in. these kids are doing all they can to try to figure out a way to get ahead. and door after door gets closed on them. and the supreme court seems to be acting more like a super legislature that is shutting the door

and with me here, kenji -- he is the chief justice earl warned professor of constitutional law at nyu law school. justice warren wrote the unanimous opinion in brown versus board of education. then i just want to start with you, obviously, an historic day. what's your reaction to the >> i was born in 1968, the year they kill dr. king, the year they killed bobby kennedy. -- apparently, i'm the first person in my family that was born with all my rights, the first person in my family -- trying to get the kids together on the campus is enough, it's too much, the supreme court seems like it's living on a different planet from the communities i work in. these kids are doing all they can to try to figure out a way to get ahead and door after door gets closed on them. the supreme court seems to be acting more like a super legislature that is shutting the door now on women's rights, the rights of people with color, probably tomorrow on lesbian and gay rights. something is really wrong here. if you care about this country, if you care about democracy, the supreme court is supposed to be playing