. >> recently the supreme court heard oral arguments in the case of kentucky v. king. it concerns the question of which emergency situations allow the police to enter a home without a warrant to. this is an hour. >> we shear arguments in case 091272, kentucky v. king. mr. farley. >> may it please the court, the issue for you today of whether or not police can create exit and circumstances arises from the improper suppression of reasonably seized evidence after a reasonable warrantless entry. the tasks set forth by the kentucky supreme court is improper for several reasons. the first of which is this court has routinely held that the intent of police officers one affecting a warrantless entry is irrelevant. >> where does the supreme court say that it was looking to a subjective state of mind on the part of a police? >> the supreme court's first test is in our petition on page 26 -- [-- i am sorry. discussion starts on page 44 a and carries over to 46 day. first question of their test is whether or not officers made an attempt to purposely e. vega work requirements. >> th