power panel now, kerri urbahn, chief legal editor.ey from george washington university law professor and author and andy mccarthy. former assistant u.s. attorney. you have an op-ed out today, andy. does the constitution really protect columbia agitator khalil from deportation? what did you find >> spoiler alert, no. look, i think that we often -- this was my experience as a terrorism prosecutor in the 90s. we talk about these issues, the framing of them is in these lofty constitutional rights and interests. we talk about free speech, we talk about free association. when you get down to brass tacks where we talk about evidence, it is very rare these cases actually turn out to be purely about free speech or free association. those are not bases to punish anybody in the united states. if you are saying to somebody this nice ivy league school you have. be ashamed anything happens to it that is not free speech, that's extortion. you have to look at the way this plays out. if it's evidence of support of criminal activity, you can boot someb

let's bring in kerri urbahn, fox news legal editor.he could be deported if he resents a potential serious foreign policy consequence for the united states. can they make that stick? >> i think so. i think the government has a strong case given how broad the statute is an discre discretionary. someone who is doing something or even physically present in a way that is a problem for all -- i think the government can make a case as to why this individual is just that. think about it, he is this negotiator, and i have been thinking a lot about this, what is he negotiating for? he is not an american. he is at an american university trying to pressure this american university into adopting a pro-hamas posture which is completely antithetical -- completely antithetical to our approach to our number one ally in the middle east the u.s., and it is part of those activities, the posture i'm talking about, the partnership in tel aviv, any ties to businesses that make money off israel or israeli businesses. he did so with other students in some ways

let's bring in kerri urbahn, fox news legal editor and gerry baker, fox news contributor and editor-at-large. kerri, to you first on the news and the implications of this. >> i think there is a reason justice alito in his dissent from his colleagues said this was a "stunning" decision. he went so far as to say the judge who unilaterally issued this order initially forcing the trump administration to not review the funds going out the door, not allowing them to manage the executive branches spending, he called that an abuse of that judge's position and then chastised his colleagues on the supreme court for not blocking that judge from using his position. this is a significant setback for the trump administration, and really the executive branch in general and their ability to manage spending look for waste, fraud, and abuse as those payments go out the door. >> sandra: so that is the legal perspective. the politicos perspective, gerry? >> exactly as kerri says, we don't know, we think about the decision, because it is in order, there is no majority opinion as you would normally get. there is