and drain us and kerstin of train for over half a here and there sacrificed a lot now andreas will have to face the challenge without kasten. $45.00 participants from 5 countries at the start of the burgundy lawford. dreyer's faces a 350 kilometer trick over the next few days. the motor and his dogs will head into norway's arctic circle for the 1st leg. ice cold winds and temperatures as low as 40 degrees below 0 celsius will push them to their limits. regular breaks will be necessary the physical strain is enormous and the dog's need to recover. mental concentration is also crucial for both man and dog. after 5 and a half hours and trainers and his dogs reach the 1st checkpoint invites. they've managed around 70 kilometers. and it was quite a relaxed 1st leg the dogs found their rhythm after about 20. kilometers of course it wasn't easy the quicker they lie down now and have a rest the quicker we can recover. and then we'll see. the brakes are just as important in the race as the long runs too little sleep for the dogs and the can have dramatic consequences. while and rare sets off aga

joining us now is cnn commentator, bakari sellers, and "usa today" columnist, kerstin powers. warren has confirmed essentially what her aides were saying earlier today or at least what two people she talked to afterward said, does this become a bigger point of contention between them publicly now? >> well, i think it's a point of contention because he said it didn't happen, right? it's not -- in itself, i don't actually -- i know a lot of people are trying to make it into a really big deal, but it sounds like, especially based on her longer statement, she refers to this as punditry. so it wasn't bernie sanders saying i don't think a woman should be president. it might have been bernie sanders just saying, you know, that he didn't think that a woman could win in this climate, or something like that. but i think the fact that he has now claimed that it didn't happen and she's saying it did happen, that does turn it into something more than maybe what it would have been if he just would have explained that, you know, that was just his punditry. >> bakari, how do you see it? >> we

kerstin says, my son is 16 andi their bed.. he does complain now and again but i remind him the phone is our property and we allow him to use it until he is older and paying his way, it's my responsibility to make sure he sleeps well. it is too much temptation to stay up online. helen says, my daughter got her own phone aged four years old and this is because and there was a sharp intake of breath in the studio here, this is because her dad and i sadly divorced when she was one and a half yea rs divorced when she was one and a half years old. it was a fantastic way to keep a relationship with her father and his family strong while living 500 miles apart. seeing him in person once a month. she was able to video call him whenever she wanted to and vice versa. now she is seven and can read and write and can text her dad as well because not many families are split these days and live in different countries to one another and i think we need to keep another and i think we need to keep an open mind as to how mobiles can enhance the

. >> kerstin, we've also heard a lot from democrats about how the president was essentially doing the kremlin's work for them by promoting this conspiracy theory that ukraine was the one actually behind the hacks. >> yeah. and i think they've gone through today very methodically of laying out all of the different ways that we know that this is what the president was doing. and hakeem jeffries kept saying this for that, this for that. drawing these really clear lines between what was happening, and also relying on video of rudy giuliani going on "fox & friends" and talking about exactly what happened basically. let's keep an eye on ukraine and biden. and so i think it's a very convincing case. scott, we were talking before and he is saying it's not something that ultimately that a lot of republican senators are going to think rises to the level of impeachment. but then i just wonder what does rise to the level of impeachment, because this is so clearly -- just going through even with the transcript at the very beginning of how the transcript was altered, and they didn't even reference