[laughter] >> keyes keys fought so deeply about this for a long time i want to give her a chance to talk first. [laughter] >> i love your question in a visit made with it but the meaning is precisely the book by harvey k.. it's very inclusive than the percentage of belief. they've brought us so much progress and the backsliding is so terribly frightful. we know we could do better in this country. >> i could hardly add to that. that to me is the passion and the way that people have put their lives on the line for so long that makes our corporate toxicity in this country so hideous to me that we have backslid and we don't have -- ever since citizens united and ever since before that we don't have a government that is truly by the people, for the people of the people. >> this is not anticorporate. it's anticorporate control of the public sector, public decision-making, public power that absolutely i believe in market economies in which they play a role but it's the public will to make public decisions. that's the distinction. >> if folks wouldn't mind identifying who you are, you have an ad

from the fleet does change with the better air quality emissions the impacts will be reduced also keyes idol b will not have an impact we received and you should have received directly for the appellant two or three days ago we didn't have time to respond i'll be a little bit longer to get the responses into the record that letter questions again, the baseline issue of when they analyzed the entire trip from san francisco to had a road i believe we didn't consider that whole trip that's not true it was considered and again, it compares that to the exist baseline the existing setting ceqa says the impacts come interest physical change change from the setting to the future conditions that's exactly with the negative deck analyze that is trucks hauling solid wastes in san francisco to al monday night in this is approved that will stop in the future the trucks will haul to had a road the difference between what is happening and now in the future the basis for our impact analysis appellants claim in their letter the analysis shouldn't negative out the trips to alderman so as an example for a

and so when i wrote the memo i did say to him, you know -- and in debates keyes got under his skin and don't know whether you're -- this is, boxing fans will appreciate this reference and it may be self-evident. i don't know if you're mohamed alley or floyd patterson -- mohamed ali. i don't know when you get hit how you'll respond and, you know, we'll not know until you get into this. but it's something that you need to to think about. and the truth is that he, you know you learn about your candidate in a presidential race. presidential races are gauntlets, and they're filled with -- we have a ridiculous system. i mean, the campaigns are too long they're clearly too expensive. there's a lot wrong with the way we elect presidents but one virtue of them is that you do learn who people are. i said in 2011 that presidential campaigns are mris for the soul. you do find out who people are. and i learned a lot about him during that campaign. and, yes, he could take a punch. and what i mostly learned is in the most pressure-filled situations we faced in that campaign, he was at his calmest and