duties, in the opinion of the ethical council, can be entrusted to the judge of the kharkiv district administrative court received a conclusion from the council on compliance with the criteria of integrity and of professional ethics was therefore recommended to the high council of justice, meanwhile, the analysts of the de jure foundation carefully studied the biography of the judge and came to other conclusions, in particular, among his career achievements, he made dubious decisions during his studies, which directly contradicts the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of assets, for example in 2020, olena zaichko made a decision to build 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this plot according to another court decision, permission to build was obtained from the builder operative slice, which is part of the zone influence of the kharkiv deputy igor arikha, it is interesting that immediately after this decision, the minor children of the judge for a testicle received an apartment from the kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m², also olena zaechko likes expensive cars, last y

high duties, according to the ethical council, can be entrusted to the judge of the kharkiv district administrative courtreceived an opinion from council on compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, so it was recommended to the high council of justice, meanwhile, the analysts of the de jure foundation carefully followed the biography of the judge and came to other conclusions, in particular, among zaichko's career achievements, the adoption of sums of sins, decision -making during education, which directly contradicts the law , as well as opaque declaration of property, for example , in 2020, olena zaichko made a decision to develop 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this plot in accordance with another by a court decision, the builder was granted permission to build by operative slice, which is included in the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy ihor arikha. it is interesting that immediately after this decision, the judge's minor children got ownership of an apartment for nothing from the kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m², olena zaechko also likes

duties, according to the ethical council, can be entrusted to the judge of the kharkiv district of the administrative courte received an opinion from the council about compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, so she was recommended to the high council of justice, meanwhile, the analysts of the de jure foundation carefully followed the biography of the judge and came to other conclusions, in particular, among the career achievements of zaichko, the adoption of questionable decisions decisions during training, which directly contradicts the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of property, for example, in 2020, olena zaichko made a decision to develop 13 hectares of forest despite the arrest of this plot, according to another court decision, the construction permit was granted to the builder operative slice, which is part of the zone of influence of the kharkiv deputy ihor arikha. it is interesting that immediately after this decision, the judge's minor children received an apartment from the kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m² for a testicle. also, olena zay