that is, they reconcile with each other there, they cannot khodorkovsky all the rest. people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to identify the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find parts to stake, what kind of money to pump into them? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist groups should not be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also carrying out our respective russian work on them, which we did not agree on . it developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the russian leadership. federation in particular vladimir putin, and the waves that accompanied it in parallel were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line against the government. e leadership of russia, it has already exhausted itself and needs look for new mechan

that is, they make peace with each other there, the same khodorkovskys cannot do everything else.st them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to identify the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find the parts to bet, which put money in there? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist groups cannot be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also using them for our russian related work. how much more we disagreed , i, uh, would have seen more subtle settings here, as it seems to me, but here is the anti-russian rhetoric. it developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the russian leadership. federation in particular vladimir putin and waves, which accompanied her in parallel, these were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line agains

that is, they make up with each other there, the same khodorkovsky all the rest cannot. well, who will trust them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to determine the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find parts to place a bet, what kind of money to pump there? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist group cannot be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also using them for our russian related work. why did they agree? i, uh, would have seen more subtle settings here, it seems to me, but anti-russian rhetoric developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the leadership of the russian federation, in particular vladimir putin, and the waves that accompanied it in parallel were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line a

he stated the creation of an anti-war committee under the wing of khodorkovsky , for example, in russiait is now being raised again now these anti-war committees of khodorkovsky forums freely russia kasparov a-a. ours or already wrong, says our whites there. this is most likely about the polish there, about the western tikhanovskaya with their offices before this guaido venezuela, this front, yes or the front line. here is vyacheslav what should be kept in mind here. here, what kind of game is being played here, so that we don’t oversleep it too, well, absolutely. clear. what a game, when there is a conflict on the outer perimeter, the forces involved must be pro-western. yes, focused on supporting these western forces, which is located inside the country. this very dangerous thing here are the fifth sixth columns, some say, and their existence must be borne in mind that such things will be shown and this tough confrontation between the west and the east is being waged. yes, therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to them, but on the other hand, it is necessary to open them. to show

of wagner's private military campaign yevgeny prigozhin continues to wage war against ukraine khodorkovskywas once considered the richest man in russia, lost his business empire and spent 10 years in prison after falling out with putin over drukovsky, who was called progozhena, who only recently admitted that created pvk wagner as an important tool for the kremlin, which allows putin to deny responsibility for some of the most controversial actions of his regime, let's listen, the probability of that is very small the probability that unarmed people will try to do something, rather, the problems in the point will not be related to the return of the mobilized, especially in the event of a military defeat. putin can lose power only in the event of a defeat, in this case there are several groups in his entourage that can claim power. this is mr. mishuy with this, a soviet man, one of prigozhin's people, kovalchuk, together with kadyrov, and zolotov, it is possible, but none of them will be able to hold power, it is possible that putin will leave power in 2024, but his regime will live until i

i can say more about khodorkovsky's spectacles.sky running around. misha is a jew, of course, a jew. well, in general, it is useful for our business, that is, this one says that there is not on the way. you know this for the time being, and then, again, life will come up with such combinations that you open your mouth like that and think what kind of thing it was. except for one moment, so far we have not seen these characters at this congress, or we do not know that they exist. ok then. they then then it turns out strange. well, sort of like a groundhog. well, you see, but it 's there. well, i don't see these people. but then i agree with the theses that have already been heard here about the fact that, uh, people, uh, whom we are watching here, we are laughing at the ponomariov gudkov or anatoly, lukyanova there or vladislav inozemtsev, but i personally know them all quite well . these are very smart rational people. and they are, well , definitely not in a cap, parsley is used to jumping, if smart rational people, this means the

mikhail khodorkovsky, with his characteristic simplicity, acts as an unkind predictor of this war.t will objectively end in a direct clash with nato. well, sweet dreams about the collapse of russia in different versions, that is, the idea, there is not constructive, but destructive russians, as already divided by the nation , shenderovich should achieve further here. well, just tactless. why is the collapse of imperial russia poking about this thing completely. in my opinion, the inevitable russia will either change, if i were a bookmaker, i would put 20 percent on this lucky case. yes, it will change within the framework towards canada yes, towards the federalism of canada germany does not matter, yes, the states of the provinces. that self-government freedom if russia insists on today's imperial tracing-paper to seize territories on the imperial past. if it insists that the essence of other empires is not a decree for it, that it is not going to reform, it will fall apart. the obvious thing this migrant company has in common is that they cynically hate russia , even call it a fas

for by the company which finances wagner's private military company, according to the mikhail khodorkovskyenter, all the threads lead to the kremlin chef and oligarch close to putin, yevgeny prigozhin, and to fight in ukraine, so putin he does not even pay for his valuable gifts, but according to the most modest calculations, the bathhouse cost 150 thousand dollars, and the money for the generous president should be shared by people from his closest circle, and the main thing is that putin mutually wanted a bathhouse paid for by the master of mercenaries and paradise, but this simply shows that the kremlin leadership does not analyze well, then it did not give moscow the weapons that were requested for the war with ukraine. have all the gifts and relations formed over the years gone with the wind? in fact, everything is not quite so china leased large russian territories in siberia and even now buys cheap energy resources from the kremlin, even after the western sanctions, which beijing did not support to the letter, while at the same time pouring small amounts of money into the russian ec

pushed them, they already lived, uh, no one from one side demanded such money, but at one time khodorkovsky, who was investigated by in the case of yukos, he found 500 billion russian money abroad, that is, it is already there, it is necessary to search further, find the frozen, confiscate and transfer legislation for this is being prepared in the european union and in britain, canada, legislation is being prepared states, it is generally ready, therefore, i think that no issues with these should become the only thing that political broadcasting will political agreements and transfer this money to ukraine, but to make it happen quickly is not right if he says it is a matter of generation let's give them three billion each to here so to play and lead us by the nose no, give us large sums so that we can mentally change the approach to the reconstruction of the state. a place in mariupol constantly, for example, we talk there, i don't know about any city kharkiv, borodyanka, kherson we must approach in a new way, change the meaning, see what foreign markets are waiting for today. i would like

you tried, you said, we don't want to, we don't go to khodorkovsky anymore, they will come.od, they ruined it, which is growing. that's from what the only wall. no, they should repent at the lenin mausoleum for what they did to the communists with my homeland, you also call it trump, which he simply switched the rails to the communists. wants to lead where legitimation. all their opponents, that is, they now already call them socialists. it is no longer enough communists, today's united states are socialists. it’s not so scary a communist anymore, the worst thing is to aim at two targets, one is against your opponents, the second was chinese. who fought the most against the communists and fought and destroyed them just like the jews. nazis and when you talk about the great patriotic war? most of all died, of whom there were the most volunteers, who shed the most blood and fought best of all. soldiers with green and crimson caps do not show these perverts in your films. namely, they are on the very sectors of the front, someone fought about it, he says, we say who yes, we say

mikhail khodorkovsky, with his characteristic simplicity, acts as an unkind predictor. this is war.dreams about the collapse of russia in different versions, that is, the idea, there is not constructive, but destructive russians, as already divided by the nation , shenderovich should achieve further here. well, just without tact. why does the collapse of imperial russia bother this thing completely in my opinion, the inevitable russia will either change, if i were a bookmaker, i would put 20 percent on this lucky chance. yes, it will change within the framework towards canada yes towards the federalism of canada germany no matter yes land states provinces. yes, self-government freedom if russia insists on today's calcium on imperial tracing paper to seize territories on the imperial past. if it insists that the essence of other empires is not a decree for it, and that it is not going to reform, it will fall apart. it is quite obvious that this immigrant company has in common that they cynically hate russia , even call it a fascist state, turning everything upside down, it turns out

number of people, especially those who have now left fled the country all these bulky supporters of khodorkovskyon and so forth, who are not just there. hmm. will think about it, they offer their services. and on the topic of the events that take place in the international arena. they fled here we are talking about who sits in russia remained in russia, but this is no longer a mass story. so, but what i want to say, but there is no big risk precisely from the point of view there, as we like to call people of liberal views about westerners from the point of view of large protests or a change of power. no no no, they are maximum signal amplifiers, what about what? i mean. right now, even a telegram channel is opened there, a bunch of telegram channels have been launched with a large audience, some other sites, that is, they, as an information force for building up , are informational, like a street as a corporation , there are no protests, as there are no forceful ones, because them this power. that is, i have you now. first, wait, i just want to stop here in this part and not continue to discuss