khord, for example, let's say that in the guardian council, in the past periods, we would see someone , for example, have a problem with his educational qualification. now, he should have given us his objection. then, for example, let 's say that we announced to the ministry of science, it would have lost time, while maybe spiritual and material expenses and manawi also had for that person, for example, he did not reach a conclusion, the stamp of disqualification would be placed on his forehead, while, for example , he had not submitted his resignation on time, a completely formal discussion, or, for example, he thought that his education was correct, but, for example , he faced a problem. there were costs that he was imposing in the end, but in my opinion, i must say that the law was clearly written that people have the right to protest, and the institutions are obliged to respond, and the law even predicted that if someone did not receive an answer from the institution he has the right to register, which of course, i think the devices work to do it on time at that stage , so i would