between version one and two you see the changes after my time is up i'll give copies to sergeant killshawnd for the commissioners just a purview of the items in our written commissions dismissing submissions in addition to the ones we expressed as to why we prefer version two the mandatory language is closer to the community standard and the reverberation two has a stronger principle of deesclation has a stronger commitment to promoter i did and we building that the immediate threaded defined in version two is better for the imminent threat than version one a few suggestions we expressed the meetings and repeated in the written submission are committed rvpthd a commitment to unbiased policing and the department of justice of broadening the depiction of report recent use of force or resolving it into distance and one version right now for the affordable use of force is defined definitely we support a broader definition we suggestions specific to data collection not in either version as well as some additional substantive comments on version one and two this is finalized from the panel i'll

room along the walls or. >> sergeant killshaw do question are an overtime i'm the messenger make sure they know you're here and ready to speak i want to thank acting deputy chief chaplain you didn't have to volunteer or take this job i sure that is a perm says to you and your family and wanted to address this appointment and concern the practice the department has used no holding town hall meetings it is temporary suspended out of the concern those meetings have been i don't know disruptive and counterproductive we looked and not backwards in the department looks at backwards and not transparency that's not a good sign we need 0 more transparency and it is important to recognize the 21st century task force they recommended in fact, the department is doing it those sorts of town hall meetings they recommend in a neutral manner i'm suggest the problem with the members of the committee are mostly not knoll the information is selective and something inadequate and there could be a commitment to neutrality those have important peerdz for transparency sake and needs something the city as pr

large number of speakers on this important remorseful we've worked on for some time the sergeant killshawill read the rules their decided in 2005 and how we have to proceed so before we start let me say this i'm asking for everyone's corporation in insuring the meeting run as smoothly the commission wanted to hear we've gotten strict feedback but important to hear from everyone so speaker during may speak their mind the commission didn't allow conduct that interferes that the meeting 24 the not to exceed all noises reflections an commission members or certain comments anyone that did is that will have to stop the meanwhile and the reason is to get the public comments and feedback so with that, sergeant, next line item. >> share the rules that are governor. mbes are entitled to comment on the action on an item in addition the agenda should provide an opportunity for interests under the jurisdictions and not the subject of public comment on other united items the president my set a reasonable minded alignment and the number of persons so speak on the item together public comment limit is tw

room along the walls or. >> sergeant killshaw do question are an overtime i'm the messenger make sure they know you're here and ready to speak i want to thank acting deputy chief chaplain you didn't have to volunteer or take this job i sure that is a perm says to you and your family and wanted to address this appointment and concern the practice the department has used no holding town hall meetings it is temporary suspended out of the concern those meetings have been i don't know disruptive and counterproductive we looked and not backwards in the department looks at backwards and not transparency that's not a good sign we need 0 more transparency and it is important to recognize the 21st century task force they recommended in fact, the department is doing it those sorts of town hall meetings they recommend in a neutral manner i'm suggest the problem with the members of the committee are mostly not knoll the information is selective and something inadequate and there could be a commitment to neutrality those have important peerdz for transparency sake and needs something the city as pr