but if kim john hill says i'm going to blow you up, i'll blow up san francisco, go to hell. they have no choice, but to just be like, okay, well he's not shooting at us, so we're not gonna blow him up. they, they're, they're just, they practice not just selective outrage, but they're very, very surgical with the, the type of politics that they have. so will there be a counter balance? i think that what we've seen is that united states has never sought that in anything. and what's happened as a result of that is all of the post 911 was the only outline the united states state seems to reliably have is the you and is real. and even the was contentious because that depends on who was getting a slice of sikes pico and then they decided whether they want it to be in the war in syria versus the warner rock. so it's not a reliable partner, but who is a reliable partner? is always going to be the u. k. and israel, they will go along with the united states, like 3 people, and in any gang, which is what you have with russia and its allies to, they'll be wrong in public, in, in public