they're about taking chubby girls who work at kinko's and lacing them up in corsets so tight their bosomd says, "howdy." bosoms would not have said "howdy" in the 15th century. if anything, they would've said, "huzzah." i don't care what the bosoms say, sheldon. i just want to be part of the conversation. hi, guys. looks like you've been to the renaissance fair... i'm hoping.

and in year 2000, we ceded a program with the founder of kinko's to provide child care for women who wanted to attend city college to pursue a nursing degree because that's one of the impediments is lack of child care. in 2009, we teamed up with the osha family to provide assistance, so i have been contributing to the mission district for 17 years, and i will continue to contribute in a positive way. i own businesses where i -- i have a business where 100% of the employees are hispanic. and i hire people of all sorts, so i will be a responsible businessperson in the mission district, and i've communicated that to them, but they don't seem to appreciate that i've actually, you know, been contributing to the mission campus for -- for that long. >> vice president richards: so your saying your word is good based on -- >> absolutely. >> vice president richards: okay. >> in fact, i intended to do this all these -- i think there's a better way -- i understand they have these grievances. this at the end of the day is meaningless, because if it's not lawful then it's not something that is goi

an israeli citizen went to kinko's and ran off some things.case, the supreme court was able to dodge it and not able to justify it self. but it upheld this ban on foreign contributions and expenditures and our elections. important isat is because the lower court on the d c circuit, a quite conservative judge in washington, d.c., wrote an opinion they came to this ,ommonsense conclusion that we is a self-governing community, get to draw close lines with respect to political participation that was based on earlier supreme court precedent that was about foreign activities in the state and what states could do to regulate foreign activities. a long line of cases about when states were able to, not generally discriminate against aliens -- that is still suspect, but when they could regulate the presence of foreigners in politically sensitive roles. by upholding the federal law and relying on the state law, it left open the field for states to come in and take various measures. perhaps mimicking the federal ban, but certainly other lesser notures lik

morn--they do some things that cultivate a relationship with the community, and they out-competed kinko, things like that, d they were able to do that. and, again, i understand these are isolated, small examples, but i want to remind you capitalism comes into the world, beginning with isolated, small examples, and those have to be struggled over and reproduced and grown, and then something else is possible. another way to put this, and it goes back to your question about the unions, i like to use a parallel with slavery. there are two ways to react to slavery, and you always see whenever there's a struggle against slavery, as there was in this country in the 19th century with our slavery in the southern states. one response to slavery, of people who are critical of it, is to work very hard to improve the conditions of slaves. feed them better, clothe them better, don't allow their families to be ripped apart in the slave market. all those things we understand. and the movement, the critical movement against slavery all over the united states, including the south, often took the form of