evidence. >> you actually talked to kirstin on the phone. i want our viewers to here some of what she said in terms of why she was so initially trustworthy of law enforcement. >> i want them to know that i didn't do it. i didn't know that there was any inconsistencies between what i was telling them and what had happened in their case. i figured if i told them the okay. >> joe, what stands out to you most dramatically about kirstin's case? >> the thing that's so unbelievable is the fact that the timeline is clear that the murder in question took place at a different time and that she was acknowledging that she had -- she had been a victim. she was a victim of an attempted attack and fended off the attacker and that's what she thought she was, you know, she was talking to the police about and the police kind of manipulated her into talking and now used the statement against her when there is so much evidence to show that this crime could not have happened the way the prosecutor lays out. the thing that i find the most outrageous and it happen