because i found out about it in the public domain, and therefore i actually bore it, and about kiryushchenkohim, well, just him , he's a really smart dude, he's an interesting, smart dude, and i just already had the story written, we kind of talked, i say, there's new year's, he says yes, new year's is very good, but damn, and here we are like... rather about pro-cultural, well, like, we talked about some accents, and about the production ones, the producer and i talked with ostrovskaya, that is, it was all more there, and it goes from here, that is, the series is not just a comedy filmed in an apartment in kyiv, that is, it is a traveling group, we they understood all this, and that is why we drew up the budget absolutely honestly as it was, that is, about kiryushchenko, i meant, why was he present in the competition police at all? i don't know, i don't know this, and how do you feel about it, is it normal in general, or - why does a citizen of the russian federation have an organdsu here, by the way, i'm just wondering, for myself, well , i'm a consequence, i don't know if he has dual or n

i understand correctly that this kiryushchenko, who, as ivan kazalenko says, has a russian passport,e was specifically delegated. from the president's office, well, if i'm not mistaken, then yes , it seems, yes, actually, this proves a certain, certain, actually political culture in ukraine, but that i, for the sake of justice, should say that the same legislation was written under president poroshenko, and we remember that in the supervisory board, correct me if it is not yes, there was maryna poroshenko, she was the head of the supervisory board, the head of the supervisory board. entered the supervisory board, there were different opinions about this or should and for what purpose , what was the purpose of this, and well, on the one hand , to ensure stability, so that is, quite often , it also depends very much on the political culture, but in many countries, the first order deals with culture. ugh, and that’s why there is logic in this, that the first lady should at least be on the supervisory board of the ukrainian cultural fund, i don’t see anything wrong with it, it seems to m

surin or the director of my beautiful nanny and other quarters russian kiryushchenko. i understand correctly that this kiryushchenko, who, as ivan kazalenko says, has a russian passport, he was specifically delegated by the president's office. well, if i'm not mistaken, yes, it seems so. actually, it proves a certain, certain, actually political. in ukraine, but for the sake of justice, i must say that the same legislation was written under president poroshenko, and we remember that in the supervisory board, correct me if this is not so, there was maryna poroshenko, she was the head of the supervisory board, the head of the supervisory board of the ukrainian football federation was maryna poroshenko, how do you feel about it , i remember that when she joined the supervisory board, there were different opinions about it, whether we should... both here and for what was the purpose, what was the purpose of this, and well, on the one hand, to ensure stability, yes, that is , quite often it also depends a lot on the political culture, but in many countries the first lady de

kiryushchenko, a fairly well-known star, and therefore, actually, in my opinion, there is nothing wrong with this, and for obvious reasons there is no such rule in the legislation that the first lady should still be in the supervisory board, because it should be her probably a personal decision and the president's decision, maybe, but i don't see any risks in it, maybe. and regarding, and regarding this, my actual question related to maryna poroshenko, but also that in the legislation these two candidates from the office of the president, it was established during the presidency of petro poroshenko, and not during the presidency of volodymyr zelenskyi, that is, what do you see the expediency of such a thing, should it already be in the new law, well, but, again, maryna poroshenko was not elected from the office poroshenko, yes, because she was the head of the supervisor. she was elected by eight other members of the supervisory board, as the ninth member and actually the head of the supervisory board and the head of the ukrainian cultural fund itself, because these are the positions of

kiryushchenko, a fairly well-known star, and therefore, actually, in my opinion opinion, there is nothingrong with this, for obvious reasons there is no such rule in the legislation that the first lady. after all , she was in the supervisory board, because it must be her personal decision and the president's decision, maybe, but i don't see it there are no risks, maybe volodymyr , but regarding this, my actual question also concerned marina poroshenko, but also that in the legislation these two candidates from the office of the president, it was established during the presidency of petro poroshenko, and not during the presidency of volodymyr zelenskyi , yes, that is, which, as you can see. the expediency of this should already be in the new law, well, but , again, maryna poroshenko was not elected by poroshenko's office, yes, since she was the head of the supervisory board, yes, she was actually elected by eight other members the supervisory board, the ninth member, and actually the chairman of the supervisory board and the chairman of the ukrainian cultural fund itself, because these are

kiryushchenko, a well-known star, and therefore ah actually, in my opinion, there is nothing in thishing bad, but with for obvious reasons , there is no such rule in the legislation that the first lady should still be in the supervisory board, because it should be her personal matter. probably the decision and the decision of the president, perhaps, but i don’t see any risks in this, maybe the power regarding, and regarding this, my actual question was about maryna poroshenko, but also that in the legislation these two candidates from the office of the president, this was established during the presidency of petro poroshenko, and not during the presidency of volodymyr zelenskyi, yes, that is, what, as you see the expediency such, is it worth already in...

kiryushchenko became one of the members of the supervisory board, who has a russian passport, and actually we try to prevent this, yes, and the ninth person, the ninth person, she is already elected - as the head of the supervisory board by other members already elected to the supervisory board based on previous tenders. if we talk about the ukrainian cultural fund, about the very case of its creation and its activities, well, at least until the 19th year, including, in particular, for sure, what the ukrainian cultural fund was, what it is not now and why there is such a struggle for control over this fund ? in fact, before the 20th, that is, in... the 20th year, in fact at the end of the 20th, this revolution took place, when the old cadres of culture, i.e. suslensky, it has long been in the ukrainian culture, is actually such a parasite of ukrainian culture, and it is actually his fault that he is trying to extend his term, if we talk about the 20th year, the ukrainian cultural fund was a state investor in the field of culture, that is, it invested. in various good cultural initiatives t

will simply say, why the last supervisory board was scandalous, for example, there was oleksiy kiryushchenko very often talk about on our broadcasts, he is the director of the tv series, and he has a russian passport, he he wanted to be the head of the state cinema, but he didn't make the calculation, because there you need ukrainian citizenship, and because of him, in principle , the competition for the position of the head of the state cinema was hacked , then another one was voted for, and then oleksiy made his way to other institutions, to the dim channel and now to the supervisory board, why he there, by the way, it was he , together with oleksandr tkachenko, who decided which projects and which serials would win the scandalous summer... serial competition from the ministry of culture, and now there are a lot of candidates, now that they are voting for this supervisory board, public association the institute of legislative ideas analyzed that , in fact, about fifty people who will vote for these candidates are related to another member of the ukrainian supervisory board of the ukf, olek

screenwriters, screenwriters - this is not surprising, and it's a shame, citizens of russia, the same kiryushchenkoe russian citizen who is currently appointed there was even appointed as the head of some of our film industry in ukraine, but he was the main producer and screenwriter of this series, that is, things were so obvious, that is, the very fact that zelenskyi has been there for as many as 25 years of his... . activity, as the satirist never made a sharp joke about putin, we will not see in any of them, well, that is, if we compare even with our project, then... the second character after yanukovych was odious was putin, in our these were masks, these cartoon ones, they were all blanks for the production of cartoons, they were just to highlight this terrible role that this character plays in the history of ukraine, but zelensky mocked ukrainian politicians and played a poho funeral . the same poroshenko, let me remind you, in one of these series of his series, where he mocked his parents, as if the late poroshenko and his children, i in general, when i saw his joke about the fact that - wel

screenwriters, that is, why not , it is surprising, and even unfortunate, citizens of russia, that kiryushchenkoself, a citizen of russia, who has now been appointed there, was even appointed the head of some of our film industry in ukraine, but he was the main producer and screenwriter of this series, that is , things were so obvious, that is, the very fact that zelenskyi... during the 25 years of his activity as a satirist, he never made a sharp joke about we will not see putin in any of them, well, that is, if we compare even with our project funny eggs, then the second character after yanukovych was odious putin, we had masks, these are cartoons, these are all blanks for production. cartoon, they were just there to highlight this terrible role that this character plays in the history of ukraine, but zelensky mocked ukrainian politicians, yes, played a poho burial of the same poroshenko, i will remind you in one of these series of his series, where he mocked his parents, apparently the late poroshenko and his children, in general, when i saw in his... about the fact that they had some kind of

screenwriters, that is... which is not surprising and unfortunate, citizens of russia, the same kiryushchenkoof russia , who has now been appointed there, even appointed as the head of some of our film industry there in to ukraine, but he was the main producer and screenwriter of this series, that is , things were so obvious, that is, the very fact that zelenskyi during his 25 years of activity as a satirist never... never made a sharp joke about putin, we didn't we will see in none, well, that is, if we compare even with our project funny eggs, then the second character after yanukovych was the odious putin, in our masks these were cartoon masks, all of them - blanks for making cartoons, they were just for in order to highlight this terrible role played by this character in the history of ukraine, but zelensky mocked ukrainian politicians and staged the poho burial of the same poroshenko, i will remind you in one of these episodes of his series, where he mocked over his parents, as it were , the late poroshenko and his children, i in general, when i saw his joke about the fact that they had